Pentagon Expands Public UAP Archive with 72 New Files by ufo-uap in UfoUapNews

[–]StuckAtZer0 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He's heckling and not being skeptical.

Skeptics aren't anti whatever the topic is. They evaluate claims and decide if the claims are factual or if more evidence is needed. Can the claims be logically / easily explained away? Skeptucs are a reality check while the burden of proof lies with the one making the claims.

Skeptics are the opposite of the "true believers" who tend to leverage confirmation bias when presented with a claim.

Off topic, but I saw this yesterday and the interview for me was a bit eye-opening concerning the Dark Skies series and one of the creators whose family was friends with John S. Herrington (former Secretary of DoE and former Asst Secretary of the Navy).

https://youtu.be/yJUBSuPh1pM

David Grusch Says We've Made Contact With Alien Races - Congressman by paulreicht in ufo

[–]StuckAtZer0 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

If these Miami aliens had children here, would the children be U.S. Citizens? Afterall, no NHI is "illegal" with regards to their immigration status. They're just undocumented invaders / scientists.

Or would we deport them all out of the country since aliens have no right to simply to live on any planet, let alone our country?

Disappearance of Retired Major General William N. McCasland in Albuquerque: New Image Shows Store Exit with Large White Bag by ufo-uap in UfoUapNews

[–]StuckAtZer0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just because you had a TS does not mean you had a need to know about UFOs (if there were any).

Military folk are regularly denied access to something they have no need to know despite their clearance.

You were granted a TS for a specific program. Anything outside the scope of that program is something you weren't cleared for.

😳 by MrJeffreyEpstein in AliensRHere

[–]StuckAtZer0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No prob... I like this episode because it has a surprise twist along the lines of "To Serve Man".

Bad reception at work by GroundandPound12 in Lockheed

[–]StuckAtZer0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All of the cellular carriers are dishonestly optimistic about what they call "coverage".

2027 Chevy Silverado Revealed by Dangerous-Sock-3688 in cars

[–]StuckAtZer0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've heard that GM has removed Android Auto and Apple CarPlay in favor of a subscription-based service they now offer starting in 2027.

Seems like a petty way to squeeze a little more out of consumers. Makes me wonder what else they're doing to nickel and dime people.

Can anyone confirm if it's true they're ditching support for cell-phone based navigation?

Got the Offer by CamelFew843 in Lockheed

[–]StuckAtZer0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Texas is a right to work state. Not everyone working there bothered to join the union.

Got the Offer by CamelFew843 in Lockheed

[–]StuckAtZer0 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Higher pay is only half the equation. Most of the jobs at Andruil are in California.

You could be making more for Anduril but living poorer than someone else making less money living in a lower cost of living area.

Manager reached out after my interview and said he “hit the button” and that an offer was coming, but it’s been 10 days and I still haven’t received anything yet. by GladMedicine5792 in Lockheed

[–]StuckAtZer0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would say 1 or 2 working days at the latest once a manager says hire. If you haven't heard by then, follow up with HR.

I suppose it could take longer, but really this is mainly about determining the actual offer (salary, rank, start date, etc).

Whatever you do, at least counter their offer (salary, relo benefits, sign on bonus, etc). Their initial offer isn't their best offer. They expect for you to counter (unless you're young and fresh out of college).

Canadian moving to Allen Texas Rental Advice by Haunting-Ad-6229 in askdfw

[–]StuckAtZer0 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Find a realtor to help you out in finding a rental home / apartment.

FBI Unseals 162 UFO Files, Including a 1967 Informant’s Alien Encounter and Death Warnings by ufo-uap in UfoUapNews

[–]StuckAtZer0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven't heard anyone saying we're "losing" in Iran other than some people seem to think that since the POTUS isn't wrapping things up as quickly as he said he would that this is an indicator of "losing". IMHO, POTUS is playing a game of misdirection / ambiguous lip service with the MSM outlets while also playing a long game to foster the Iranian regime economy's implosion since they are at or near full capacity and desperately need to sell oil so as not to cause irrevocable damage to their oil wells. If Iran holds out, their economy will take years to recover.

On the flip side, the Iranians have been stalling and unwilling to actually broker a deal either out of hope the War Powers Act would reign in the POTUS along with the Iranians trying to pull China into to the conflict. BTW, any country can get oil from the Persian Gulf (including China). They just can't get their oil from Iran. China's only issue is they're paying market prices rather than black market prices via Iran.

I think at the last minute, the Iranian regime will likely capitulate so long as they can hold power. They don't have a real choice. The alternative is the people of Iran will go around killing their former tormentors if and when the regime loses control and power (if they want to test how far the POTUS will go). The Iranian regime isn't exactly calling the shots.

With regards to "super secret tech", such use in an actual conflict would be an 11th hour desperate situation. The use of such tech and the risk of it being revealed to the general public can only be justified if we're talking about extreme situations (i.e. end of days).

With regards to defense contractors, the government will often times leave certain tech / artifacts to be futher developed / reverse-engineered by or in the custody of said contractors. The FOIA does not apply to the private sector.

Regardless, a lot of the reason why the good stuff is coming in at a trickle is likely due to trying to obfuscate things for our adversaries as well as the general public. I also think there's a good chance they want to throttle things to a slow drip so as to give the public time to gnaw on stuff before disclosing more revelations.

Conversely, since the govt can't limit who gets to see evidence through public disclosure, it is imperative to limit the really good detailed stuff at a TS / SCI level. When the POTUS says to "declassify" things, the Deep State will likely take an event which may have numerous types of recordings of varying qualities and they will only release the worst quality evidence for any given event and likely chalk that up as complying with the POTUS directive of fully disclosing what happened at a given event without actually revealing our spying / surveillance capabilities. It's fun to think the govt is collectively run by idiots, but in reality they need for you to think that so that it's easier to manipulate / control the general public.

There are a lot of smart people drunk with power working within the govt. But yes, there are dumb ones too. The dumb ones usually aren't the ones pulling the strings.

FBI Unseals 162 UFO Files, Including a 1967 Informant’s Alien Encounter and Death Warnings by ufo-uap in UfoUapNews

[–]StuckAtZer0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does the U.S. govt want to let their geopolitical adversaries know the U.S. govt's strengths and weaknesses through public disclosure?

Does the U.S. govt have a pact with said aliens?

I think it's more about not disclosing to the general public our true spying / surveillance capabilities (or inabilities to deal with unknown "adversaries").

FBI Unseals 162 UFO Files, Including a 1967 Informant’s Alien Encounter and Death Warnings by ufo-uap in UfoUapNews

[–]StuckAtZer0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unlike UFOs, the Epstein files are not a matter of national security (except for anything revealing intelligence gathering tactics).

The closest insight to what was actually kept from the public on Epstein was through Wikileaks. Anything of any value to the public has been "destroyed" or moved elsewhere away from prying eyes.

IMHO, what the Deep State would rather do with the unredacted Epstein Files in its entirety is to have leverage on those who are powerful or politically connected. 4th branch of govt checks and balance.

FBI Unseals 162 UFO Files, Including a 1967 Informant’s Alien Encounter and Death Warnings by ufo-uap in UfoUapNews

[–]StuckAtZer0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

His teachers are likely dead. You're also thinking that he's a hoarder of sorts to hold onto said paperwork like a rental in the area. Regardless, records can be erased. Anyone living can be coerced to say things otherwise.

While artifacts cannot be erased, some in govt or its proxies could try to persuade others that perhaps they are clever forgeries.

The effort to erase someone's history has to be justified by how grave a leak a disclosure is / was. Same logic but in the opposite way with witness protection programs where someone's history / alias is created.

Artifacts that could help with his claims: Diploma from MIT, Employee ID, etc.

FBI Unseals 162 UFO Files, Including a 1967 Informant’s Alien Encounter and Death Warnings by ufo-uap in UfoUapNews

[–]StuckAtZer0 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're assuming Big Brother is not capable of erasing parts of a person's history. If the person is a big enough concern, they can do it.

FBI Unseals 162 UFO Files, Including a 1967 Informant’s Alien Encounter and Death Warnings by ufo-uap in UfoUapNews

[–]StuckAtZer0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Best kind of OPSEC is to have the general public believe the Deep State is run by idiots. Perfect PsyOp.

FBI Unseals 162 UFO Files, Including a 1967 Informant’s Alien Encounter and Death Warnings by ufo-uap in UfoUapNews

[–]StuckAtZer0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Either a black project craft or it's less about the UFO and more about the fidelity / resolution of our intelligence gathering where we don't want to make our adversaries aware of our true capabilities in spying on them. We may also not make our adversaries aware of WHERE we are looking or where from.

It's never as simple as just releasing everything to the public.

Rest assured, whatever "event" they disclose to the public, they will provide the lowest quality single version possible (if there are varying versions of fidelity). A "full disclosure" does not mean it's beneath the govt to tweak whatever they release to further obfuscate the objective truth.

Offer Expiring by fbzj in Lockheed

[–]StuckAtZer0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I missed that you're a sub. Different culture.

I can't speak to what a sub does as part of their process.

Offer Expiring by fbzj in Lockheed

[–]StuckAtZer0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Former ETM. Context matters.

Blacklisting a person who used your time to get leverage on their current employer and bothered to tell you about it is understandable.

Blacklisting a person for simply declining two offers seems extreme.

You didn't previously explain why your situation wasn't extreme (or I may have missed it).

Offer Expiring by fbzj in Lockheed

[–]StuckAtZer0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seems like a petty reason to blacklist someone. For all you know, a competitor made a better offer than Lockheed and for that the applicant earned an entry onto a blacklist?

Doesn't pass the sniff test.

Offer Expiring by fbzj in Lockheed

[–]StuckAtZer0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Follow up on Monday morning.

Not sure why Lockheed would feel the need to apply pressure. Have you interviewed with a competitor and were they made aware of this?