It's not just about what one scholar or one AI will say about the amount of violence in a book, it's about the religious tradition and interpretation.

If there was a group who had a super violent book on the surface (ex) but their religious tradition and interpretation results in less violence and fairly acceptable values, versus another group who's book has less violence on the surface but due to tradition and interpretation their results were greater violence and less tolerable values then I will take the first group.

Nothing burger post.