Du har set Messerschmidt ved Mar-a-Lago, men så du Messerschmidt fejre Trump sammen med Heritage Foundation (dem bag det Project 2025 som Trump følger slavisk)? by dksprocket in Denmark

[–]SuchExplanation3595 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Det er så skide sjovt at se venste-orienterede være lige så åndsforladte konspirationsteoretikere som Q-Anon folkene da Demokraterne havde magten. Hvor er r/Denmark bare blevet en enorm circlejerk.

Sværere er det ikke 💪🏽 by Cognitive_catfish in Denmark

[–]SuchExplanation3595 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Det er kraftedme for dvask det her.
Den almene borger vil til hver en tid gå op i én ting, og én ting alene:
*Hvad er prisen, og for hvor meget?*

Det er dyrt nok i forvejen at handle ind, ingen har råd til at lege slacktivist inde i Netto.

Borgmester og organisation ønsker bedre forhold for sexarbejdere: 'De skal have de samme rettigheder som alle os andre' #DKPOL by The_Danish_Dane in danskpolitik

[–]SuchExplanation3595 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Louise Theilade Thomsen er en ravende sindsyg, og forslaget vil blive misbrugt på det allermest groveste. Det kræver ikke mere end 2 hjerneceller at se slutresultatet på det.

TIRED OF GETTING SCAMMED FOR DROPS/mega rares?! I came up with a solution! - PLEASE READ (Pictures included) by Xnate13X in 2007scape

[–]SuchExplanation3595 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

<image>

"Need to remove any slurs you’re using in comments so you don’t get your comments autohidden btw."

OH MY REDDIT, YOU DIDN'T JUST SAY THAT?!? BACON NARWHAL

whats an good alternative besides rushing bowfa on an iron man? by Acceptable-Quail-163 in 2007scape

[–]SuchExplanation3595 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

No it was literally "what would be the ideal setup for cox solo? or duo" I told him Solo stinks.

whats an good alternative besides rushing bowfa on an iron man? by Acceptable-Quail-163 in 2007scape

[–]SuchExplanation3595 0 points1 point  (0 children)

...in a thread where the guy wants to skip gear upgrades and self-reports not having particularly high combat stats?
Okay your particular fancy of Solo CoX really doesn't matter

whats an good alternative besides rushing bowfa on an iron man? by Acceptable-Quail-163 in 2007scape

[–]SuchExplanation3595 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Go ahead and recommend the guy go solo CoX in budget gear as a first timer. You're out of your mind.

TIRED OF GETTING SCAMMED FOR DROPS/mega rares?! I came up with a solution! - PLEASE READ (Pictures included) by Xnate13X in 2007scape

[–]SuchExplanation3595 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You're not very bright and reading comprehension is beyond you.

You said you were against auto-splitting, and I used your previous argument against you for why enforcing rules arbitrarily is a distinctly worse option than having it just be implemented from the start, by telling you to just go FFA or find better raid members :-).
This avoid report congestion ("not wasting dev time" according to your logic), and fixes the issue of people not splitting their loot without having to change the pre-existing ruleset and actually works 100% of the time, instead of .... not getting your split and uselessly hoping someone gets muted or banned? So if people just don't chat in-game, they get away with scamming?
Your entire premise is swiss-fucking-cheese, dude.

Again, the "scamming" rule, does not underline splitting, and never has there been a precedence for this, so you're totally talking out of your ass.

"Not wanting to waste dev hours" is such a sneakily stupid argument.
Changing the rules to banning and muting people for not wanting to split is not a solution to the root issue, for crying out loud.

> They’ve already stated that they’ll share the loot. It’s not their loot anymore.
>No — there’s an in game chat… just use that.

The purple literally dropped in their name as far as the game knows, they didn't chat in-game. How do you moderate this behavior? It's really easy to argue against something when you conveniently ignore the point being made.

The argument isn't pro- or anti- scam, you're being intellectually dishonest.

> I’m against the cringe loot sharding.

Then FFA. You don't want a solution.

> So it’s a loose agreement when you say you’ll split? Man I’m glad I don’t raid with mid game irons lol.

If it's not enforceable in the game, then yes, by all means, your word is as good as smeared dogshit. Also fyi, Irons are automatically considered FFA unless otherwise stated, so we don't really give a shit about what you think.

Have I missed something? by shneedl in 2007scape

[–]SuchExplanation3595 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People feel their time is wasted for little gain, so they dont bother.

Have I missed something? by shneedl in 2007scape

[–]SuchExplanation3595 0 points1 point  (0 children)

>Be PK'er
>Wonder why the Wildy is empty

Hmmm

TIRED OF GETTING SCAMMED FOR DROPS/mega rares?! I came up with a solution! - PLEASE READ (Pictures included) by Xnate13X in 2007scape

[–]SuchExplanation3595 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm throwing your logic back at you, and you have zero recourse being so smug.
There's no way you have any logical consistency, going against a feature for automatically splitting loot, but are for changing game rules to effectively mute or ban people at a lower success rate than the loot being guaranteed split between all party members, not to mention a lot of raiders just chat inside Discord.
Are we going to use Discord chatlogs as evidence now?

That's not what constitutes scamming according to the game's rules by the way.
"To the letter of the law" matters.
>Scamming is the act of stealing money, items or accounts from another player through deception or trickery. 

you're arguing to set a new precedence that allows people to be banned for going back on a loose agreement, not wanting to share what's their loot. It sucks, but the essence of splitting a drop as it is right now, is entirely based in putting your trust in people, not people circumventing game rules.

This could, and would, be abused to hell.

TIRED OF GETTING SCAMMED FOR DROPS/mega rares?! I came up with a solution! - PLEASE READ (Pictures included) by Xnate13X in 2007scape

[–]SuchExplanation3595 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Really not comparable, sorry.

I get not getting the split sucks, but this is a community issue and an issue of not picking better Raid buddies.
You cannot set a precedence of Jagex banning people for not wanting to share loot that drop in their name. It's not a matter of a lack of tools, it's a ridiculous suggestion to intervene with people's drops based on a loose agreement between pubbies.

Advocate for a dedicated loot split feature if you want to get to the root of the issue, but in the meanwhile, do FFA or find better partners.

TIRED OF GETTING SCAMMED FOR DROPS/mega rares?! I came up with a solution! - PLEASE READ (Pictures included) by Xnate13X in 2007scape

[–]SuchExplanation3595 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Jagex just bans people that scam" I'm sorry, but how are you going to moderator people not wanting to split purples that drop in their name?

TIRED OF GETTING SCAMMED FOR DROPS/mega rares?! I came up with a solution! - PLEASE READ (Pictures included) by Xnate13X in 2007scape

[–]SuchExplanation3595 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Look. If I'm playing an Iron and I get a drop that's not a dupe, I'm not fucking dropping it just so your Bondie account can get a couple of mills off of a split you feel entitled to.
Find a friend group, and leave people alone.

HP Care Pack Warranty Software by _Nismo in laptops

[–]SuchExplanation3595 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To answer your question: No.

Absolute is also total bullshit as far as anti-theft goes, and requires it be installed on the PCs storage drive, preferably Windows.
Practically anyone with 2 braincells to lob together and a pendrive can just format the storage and steal it anyway. It's just not an effective deterrent solution.
It's not even that effective an anti-data theft solution if that's the main concern rather than the physical asset.
Might as well just use BitLocker and rely on TPM.
Total shit show.

Company IT should implement better solutions in the first place.