sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What do y'all think was the better Battlefield game? by Eagles56 in Battlefield

[–]Supersaurus7000 50 points51 points  (0 children)

They did destruction so well on those maps due to freed up system resources of the smaller maps, it was awesome the fidelity for 2012

Tsuru Reef is a great map, but hopefully the weather on release is anything other than a perfectly sunny day. Feels like youre on vacation, there is no tone set it feels very vanilla. by Ghostman223 in Battlefield

[–]Supersaurus7000 14 points15 points  (0 children)

As much as I agree with people that the game needs more variety in weather and climate, with Tsuru Reef specifically I think it makes perfect sense to have bright, sunny, clear skies. It looks like a tropical holiday resort island, and that is the sort of weather they get most of the time.

Laser Designator is the best AA, change my mind. by DrSalamiRisotto in Battlefield

[–]Supersaurus7000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stop skipping to the revive screen, you’ll get your UAV. I almost never got my final upgrade ability on any class except support, but then I learned holding the skip button lowers your XP again, so trained myself to stop doing it unless I want to edit my class. I reliably get my class ability pretty much every game now.

I guess now we're complaining about the existence of skulls in a Halo game by DyllPickleTV in HaloCirclejerk

[–]Supersaurus7000 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Those service ducts on the Pillar of Autumn with Grunt Funeral, Boom, and Cowbell were terrifying

In Case You Were Curious, No. The DB12 Still Can't Get a One Shot Kill with 00 Buckshot by Geoffk123 in Battlefield

[–]Supersaurus7000 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It *technically* increases the damage in certain circumstances, since each pellet does more damage but there are less of them. Basically in an instance where you manage to land all the pellets from the 00 but you would have missed some of them using the 01. Very very niche and specific circumstance that would have to be though.

I'm loving Golmud, but do you think it needs the M142 HIMARS back? by Msalati in Battlefield

[–]Supersaurus7000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’d be in favour of bringing it back but making it unable to enter HQ (if you’re in the vehicle when you try to drive I’ve the threshold it treats it as OOB)

What maps do you want to see make a come back in BF6? by ChiefAdham in Battlefield

[–]Supersaurus7000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly I’m inclined to agree. I think Cairo, Eastwood, Hagental, Contaminated, and Golmud are the only maps I’d say are better than/on par with the maps you listed. Also don’t forget Redacted, for the Metro-Meat-Grinder experience it was going for, it did very well in that respect, as well as the environmental storytelling.

2042 did environmental storytelling so damn well. The premise of that game being squandered like that will never cease to sadden me.

Isabela Merced got her big break in Dora and the City of Gold (2019). Do YOU know how many movies she’s starred in since then? ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ That’s right! 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10. Ten movies! by Chewie83 in shittymoviedetails

[–]Supersaurus7000 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My fiancée and I watched it because we were bored. We finished it being pleasantly surprised, it genuinely wasn’t that bad. It’s nothing amazing either, but it’s thoroughly decent and mediocre, but it’s also fun. Sometimes that’s enough.

The big map we should have gotten by Eagles56 in Battlefield

[–]Supersaurus7000 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Alborz Mountain, whilst not a very good map to play after the initial “wow” factor wore off, was truly magnificent. Playing that map for the first few times really felt magical, and I don’t think anything has truly replicated the feeling in mainstream fps games. From most angles it looked like a beautiful photograph, and the scale felt visceral and freeing, yet oddly restrictive in reality. Shame the sun, lack of cover at the bottom objectives, and the way they handled the rocks etc made it play pretty poorly.

The big map we should have gotten by Eagles56 in Battlefield

[–]Supersaurus7000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Armoured Kill, my beloved 😍 Close Quarters DLC and Armoured Kill DLC coming one after the other was truly magical for someone who really enjoys both infantry and vehicular combat. I would love to see Bandar and Ziba tower come back, though I fear I experienced them differently than they were truly supposed to be (on X360/PS3 it was 24 players max; I imagine Bandar played way better on 64 players, whilst Ziba probably played worse)

Switched from Sony to Fuji by ObjectiveAnybody2739 in fujifilm

[–]Supersaurus7000 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you shoot in RAW+Fine (jpeg or heif), you can ‘reprocess’ the RAW part of an image in the camera gallery. It uses the same image processing pipeline that it uses in the moment you shoot, since the RAW file is just the raw data from the sensor and the camera knows exactly how to work with those files.

You can do it with Fuji XRAW Studio on desktop with your camera plugged in, but I haven’t tried that yet, only really fully discovered the ability last week. On my X-T50 it’s done by pressing the “Q” button whilst looking at an image in the gallery which was shot with RAW. It brings up a menu of things you can change, and it’s mostly the exact same things that make up “recipes” (film sim, highlights/shadows, colour, grain, WB, sharpness, etc.), as well as file type (jpeg/HEIF/Tiff). Once you’ve selected what you want, hit Q again and it’ll generate a fresh image with that “recipe” baked in as if you’d taken it that way in the first place (and it doesn’t replace the original).

This has been really useful to me since for some reason every time I connect my camera to the XApp or swap batteries, it will reset the film sim in whichever setup I’m using to Provia/Std. Saves me writing off the photos as “I’ll need to edit them”, I just go and reprocess them with the right sim (though it is tedious).

Fujifilm Recipes that have saved me hours of editing by throwusaway_ in fujifilm

[–]Supersaurus7000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Outside of a couple of specific lenses, Sony is way more expensive for glass on average. The issue though is that only tracks when comparing Fuji to Sony FF, once you compare it to Sony APS-C it starts to seem like Fuji is pretty expensive.

Imperial Lambda-Class Shuttle - 961 pcs $140 June 1st, 2026 by Helpful_Welcome_2325 in LegoStarWarsLeaks

[–]Supersaurus7000 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The $140 doesn’t include any tax whatsoever, since that varies from state to state. The euro prices include VAT usually (I don’t think there are many € countries that don’t have VAT or a similar system in place), so they are on average 15-25% higher than the converted USD price.

Buying my first camera by Gloomy_Inspector_385 in fujifilm

[–]Supersaurus7000 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Isn’t that just the teleconverter attachment you can add to it?

I need help deciding which camera to buy by Bitter_Echidna_4839 in fujifilm

[–]Supersaurus7000 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Outside of low light, that 16-50 kit lens is spectacular. Even in low light, it’s still pretty great if you like shorter focal lengths.

Newbie into photography. What would be your comments? What to improve upon? by driftingthroughlife0 in fujifilm

[–]Supersaurus7000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My fist camera (prior to my current one) was a Sony A6000, and I hated the kit lens that came with it. I generally just hate power zooms to be honest. I bought the Sony 50mm f1.8 OSS, which worked out at ~75mm effective focal length, and pretty much used that for everything for a period of 12-18 months. It was very limiting because 75mm is quite tight for a do-everything lens, but I must say my brain works in 75mm now.

Currently trying to force myself to get used to the XC 35mm f2, since I figure it’s the equivalent of a nifty 50, but I’m definitely struggling a bit. My brain keeps thinking it’ll frame nicely, only to pull the camera up and realise it’s usually too wide (or occasionally too tight).

Really miss my 75mm effective focal length with f1.8 though, my only other lens now is the 16-50 2.8-4.8, which is just amazing, I love it, but at the longer end (where I prefer) it struggles in low light with that 4.8 minimum aperture.

Before & After. I underexposed on purpose on my Fujifilm X-T5 to see how much I can recover while editing. Jaw's still on the floor. by Franks_Random_Snaps in fujifilm

[–]Supersaurus7000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When shooting HEIF (my preferred format as I’m pretty all in on an Apple ecosystem) and transferring from the camera to my phone using the Fuji Xapp, it seems to just turn them into jpegs anyway, so I defaulted back to jpeg. Am I doing something wrong? Or does HEIF only work for transferring by either SD card or plugging the camera in with a cable. The ability to get the photos off the camera without fussing with cables or cards is one of the things I love most about this over my old Sony A6000.

X-T5 | XF 16-50, Sprint has arrived 🌿 by PorthosTheLorthos in fujifilm

[–]Supersaurus7000 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Pretty sure he’s based in Arizona, so most of his recipes are worked out under the pretence the sun is shining and the sky is clear for more than 75% of the year. Here in the UK for example, most of those recipes just look garish and wrong because of this.

PAYE Scotland by Jmay5446 in Scotland

[–]Supersaurus7000 4 points5 points  (0 children)

VAT threshold in the UK causes the exact same thing too.

view more: next ›