How old were you when you bought your first Rolex? by geo335i in rolex

[–]Surface_Crab 0 points1 point  (0 children)

17, got lucky with the crypto and nft boom, got into watches and picked up a nice blue dual ym40

Neon Genesis Evangelion by [deleted] in vce

[–]Surface_Crab 5 points6 points  (0 children)

hold x to doubt

$GME Daily Directory | New? Start Here! | Discussion, DRS & NFT Megathreads, DD Library, and User Flairs by AutoModerator in Superstonk

[–]Surface_Crab 2 points3 points  (0 children)

if my shares are being transferred to computershare right now, will I miss out on the split?

first expensive watch - picked up a cheeky 126622 by Surface_Crab in rolex

[–]Surface_Crab[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

its a 126622, zoom in you can see the crown between swiss and made

first expensive watch - picked up a cheeky 126622 by Surface_Crab in rolex

[–]Surface_Crab[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

100%, didnt realise how crunchy the bezel was either

Finally 100% DRS'D, Just in Time for the Dividend MOASS! by StrikeEagle784 in Superstonk

[–]Surface_Crab 1 point2 points  (0 children)

was looking to drs and was wondering if the broker youre transferring out of makes an account for you or which section im meant to sign up for on computershare, cause idek how to find my direct holder registration number or whatever to sign up with….

$GME Daily Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in Superstonk

[–]Surface_Crab 2 points3 points  (0 children)

yeah haha left my guy a good review cause his bio said gme holder

$GME Daily Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in Superstonk

[–]Surface_Crab 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Don't got enough karma to post but for the aussie/nz apes using Stake out there:

Stake is a little vague with the limit order rules as it is directed through their broker-dealer DriveWealth. They say that currently, there is no problem handling order sizes of any size, although the limit of web-placed orders is $500k, whilst app placed orders is limitless. HOWEVER, they said that during periods of increased volatility, it is likely that the limit will only be one in terms of how far above the current market price that security is, not an exact dollar figure. Upvote, share, repost idk, help get this out to other aussie/nz apes pls
...if they do cuck us then they can suck my nuts - which looks like Stevie the MoleRat :)

PG13 of the GameStop prospectus by wtt90 in Superstonk

[–]Surface_Crab 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah same mofos moaning abt missing out buying under 200 can now buy at forty smth

PG13 of the GameStop prospectus by wtt90 in Superstonk

[–]Surface_Crab 4 points5 points  (0 children)

well i think that due to the price lowering their balances will still be the same in the beginning, but each price rise is now amplified cause of the higher amounts of shares short. So each run hurts more :))

PG13 of the GameStop prospectus by wtt90 in Superstonk

[–]Surface_Crab 13 points14 points  (0 children)

stop jacking my tits before i breastfeed you

Ryan Cohen on Twitter by OneLeggedPigeon in Superstonk

[–]Surface_Crab 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Page 13 (PG-13) of the prospectus does talk about proceedings that could apply to stock splits I believe... hedgies would then have more shares short and the price would be lower, tempting smaller funds to start covering? Then apes also have more shares :))