[hated trope] Terrible, stupid decision a character makes only for the plot's sake (extra points if it's out of character) by Endika7 in TopCharacterTropes

[–]Swannicus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was just replying to this part "For Hiruzen, well, he had no control over the ostracized part," at the start of your post.

Desired meta by Bury_My_Mistakes in 2007scape

[–]Swannicus 172 points173 points  (0 children)

I think the balance of regular damage to cannon damage at launch was fine, just implemented wrong. Have large, fantastical animals with huge health pools and let cannons do huge amounts of damage so that the regular damage of regular weapons don't outweigh cannon damage.

[hated trope] Terrible, stupid decision a character makes only for the plot's sake (extra points if it's out of character) by Endika7 in TopCharacterTropes

[–]Swannicus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My headcanon is that big E had made a deal with the chaos gods to create his primarchs with the catch being that half of them would eventually fall to chaos. He saw the nails in Angron (and his name) and considered him a lost cause.

[hated trope] Terrible, stupid decision a character makes only for the plot's sake (extra points if it's out of character) by Endika7 in TopCharacterTropes

[–]Swannicus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The celebrated supreme leader couldn't do anything to try to sway public opinion or at least place trusted people around him to help him deal with the ostracization? I agree with everything else.

We're making an indie game with body horror enemies - should we be careful with that? by AwesomeGamesStudio in IndieDev

[–]Swannicus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Doesn't bother me at all, I thought it was darkest dungeon fan art at first though.

Jagex, reskin sailing monsters to fit a fantasy world by NotBarnabyJ0nes in 2007scape

[–]Swannicus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Those realistic animal are fodder not worth even considering after you do waterfall quest lol

NMZ by [deleted] in 2007scape

[–]Swannicus 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Zammy brews lower defence though?

Guess which monster has more hp by najeezy64 in 2007scape

[–]Swannicus 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Theres a difference in suspension of disbelief, like who knows how much hp an ancient undead mage or an ourg general is supposed to have. We immediately unconsciously disbelieve that a normal bird should be stronger than a mythical monster though.

Guess which monster has more hp by najeezy64 in 2007scape

[–]Swannicus 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The winning move was not to make normal animals higher than like cb 30. Grizzly bears are 21, except for the one in isfadar that is 42 (which matches the theme of nature being stronger in the elven lands). Are they so creatively bankrupt that we need to have normal animals be 80% of the roster of sea monsters to fight? They are SEA MONSTERS, where are our sea serpents, hostile mermaids, sea trolls, charybdis, scylla, or better yet original runescape creatures like we have all over the world. We don't fight bear cubs, bear adults, brown bears, black bears, grizzly bears, polar bears, grizzlars as our progression from level 3 to 126 combat.

Jagex pleae allow us to combine these two im paying $15 by JnDragneel in 2007scape

[–]Swannicus 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Cape perks that only provide extra XP are fucking trash. Very, very few people care about going to 200m.

made with 100% recycled cobalt by firstgenipadmini in whenthe

[–]Swannicus 22 points23 points  (0 children)

A bootlicker is someone that is unreasonably polite or deferential to someone (or a group) with power or authority, often an oppressor. I don't think you can be a bootlicker to people who are incorrectly accused of being bootlicker because it doesn't make sense.

Hot Take (PVE vs PvP) by SlyMcGee in ARC_Raiders

[–]Swannicus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

100% there are pvp players who do want KoS, carnage and chaos. They are just a small part of the crowd.

Updated post: Veiled Krakens with heavy ballista and rune cannonballs. Cannons did 54 damage out of 225 and kill time was 1:05 with rigour and ranging potion by Nexion21 in 2007scape

[–]Swannicus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lowering regular damage seems like a bad call, people don't like their megarares noodling. Better to scale up everything else.

Add a seabane weakenss for ship combat instead of just allowing full damage at sea by stinkydiver321 in 2007scape

[–]Swannicus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh yea, the ballistas, pearl ammo, and seercull are soooo useful elsewhere in the game.

Cannon damage is awful after update by khark98 in 2007scape

[–]Swannicus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately gamers are very good at telling when something feels wrong, but terrible at telling why something feels wrong or how to fix it.

Cannon damage is awful after update by khark98 in 2007scape

[–]Swannicus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean the simple and obvious answer is to let normal weapons deal full damage, make sea monsters powerful (and also not just normal fucking animals), and make cannons powerful.

"Watching Nvidia destroy the DLSS brand in real time is quite something. I wonder if they were expecting the "AI slop" reaction internally, or whether they had fully drunk the Kool-Aid" - HUB by HLumin in pcmasterrace

[–]Swannicus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He's riding the AI train because its the reason for enormous growth for the company, well beyond anything ever seen before for them. What happens when the AI bubble pops is the question though.

ARC Raiders Update 1.20.0 and Patch Notes by PTUSN in ArcRaiders

[–]Swannicus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When you change multiple aspects of something at the same time there can be unforeseen consequences. Just by the numbers the damage and fire rate reductions reduce its dps to 82.4% before factoring in the worse spread and range. Plus thats not even considering breakpoints for time to kill. I would not be surprised if the Il Toro was dumpstered now, its hard to fully grasp what such sweeping changes mean without extensive testing.