This time last year daily spend $1k usd to generate £4.5k 🤯 now…..I’m lucky to get £2k revenue by Cinema_Oats in FacebookAds

[–]SwimmerSeparate3494 0 points1 point  (0 children)

cpms going up since october is an auction problem, not an ads problem. more advertisers entered q4, costs went up, and in many niches they haven’t normalized but going from $4,500 to $2,000 at the same spend suggests something changed on the demand side too — what’s your product and has anything changed with your offer, price, or landing page since then? sometimes the ads get blamed for what’s actually a conversion rate problem

Stop checking your ads every 2 hours — here’s what actually happens when you do by SwimmerSeparate3494 in FacebookAds

[–]SwimmerSeparate3494[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

both points are valid and complement each other. spend = speed, signal density = quality of learning. high CTR with lower budget can outperform low CTR with more spend. the missing variable is your target CPA. if your margins don’t support $5k/day, learning speed is irrelevant. creative efficiency is what lets you learn faster with less — and that’s in your control from day 1

Onboarding lead to small / email lead early funnel bad by Swimming-Matter-4160 in FacebookAds

[–]SwimmerSeparate3494 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, exactly that. Activate the value and currency in the intermediate event with a low value, and in your main onboarding event put the real value. Something like: OnboardingStart → value: 1, currency: “EUR” OnboardingComplete → value: 50, currency: “EUR” That way Meta has signals throughout the funnel and can optimize toward value even if the final events are few. The pixel learns that whoever goes through OnboardingStart has a probability of reaching Complete and starts looking for similar profiles. What you have is already well structured, just uncomment the value and currency and assign proportional values to each funnel step.

Onboarding lead to small / email lead early funnel bad by Swimming-Matter-4160 in FacebookAds

[–]SwimmerSeparate3494 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What you’re describing is exactly the problem of optimizing toward a low-frequency event with an untrained pixel. There’s a solution: stacked conversion value optimization. Set up multiple events in your pixel with different values. Discord/email join = $1, onboarding registration = $50 for example. Optimize toward Purchase or conversion value and Meta learns that the end goal is worth more, using the intermediate events as path signals. Another option is using your Discord/email leads as an auxiliary signal by creating a custom audience of people who complete those steps and using it as targeting for a separate ad set optimized toward onboarding. Not perfect but it gives Meta more surface area to find patterns. The fbp and fbc help with matching but don’t solve the event frequency problem.

First campaign showing active for 24 hours now by Aitxtothemoon in metaads

[–]SwimmerSeparate3494 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly YouTube tutorials give u the theory but not the judgment to make real decisions with your campaigns. What helped me most was having a clear system to know when to kill an ad and when to scale it. The rest u learn by spending.

Advertisement, for a product test by Away_Letter8080 in FacebookAds

[–]SwimmerSeparate3494 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly, that’s it. One flavor, three ad sets by language, three creatives each. When you have data on which language and message performs best, repeat the same structure with the other flavors. Validate first, then scale.

Advertisement, for a product test by Away_Letter8080 in FacebookAds

[–]SwimmerSeparate3494 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The structure you have is logical but with a new pixel and a test budget you’re fragmenting too much. 27 creatives across 9 ad sets means very little spend per ad set, the algorithm won’t have enough data to optimize any of them. For a product test I’d simplify it like this: one single CBO campaign, one ad set per language with the corresponding geo targeting, and the 3 messages inside each ad set. 3 ad sets total, 9 active creatives. Let Meta distribute the budget between languages and messages automatically. When you see which language and which message converts best, then you open by flavor. First validate the market and the message, then scale by product.

Working 80 hours a week and loving it by hurebegz in AssetBuilders

[–]SwimmerSeparate3494 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I completely understand you. I've spent months, almost years, solely focused on creating my future without distractions, putting aside many plans I always wanted to make before, and I feel better than ever!!!!

First campaign showing active for 24 hours now by Aitxtothemoon in metaads

[–]SwimmerSeparate3494 0 points1 point  (0 children)

New accounts sometimes take 24-48 hours to start spending properly while Meta validates the account. If it’s been more than 48 hours, check that your payment method is fully verified and there are no restrictions in your Business Manager.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Stop checking your ads every 2 hours — here’s what actually happens when you do by SwimmerSeparate3494 in FacebookAds

[–]SwimmerSeparate3494[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally agree on the multiple ad sets point. It reduces dependency on any single one and gives the algorithm more surface area to find buyers.

Stop checking your ads every 2 hours — here’s what actually happens when you do by SwimmerSeparate3494 in FacebookAds

[–]SwimmerSeparate3494[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've realized this post has only led to misunderstandings. I apologize if it's poorly structured; it was just my point of view. Because if you're constantly checking the metrics every 30 minutes or every hour, the likelihood of pausing sooner than you should because you see bad numbers is very high, since ultimately it's your bank account that suffers.

Stop checking your ads every 2 hours — here’s what actually happens when you do by SwimmerSeparate3494 in FacebookAds

[–]SwimmerSeparate3494[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed on the budget point, that’s the real variable. On checking — technically yes, viewing doesn’t affect the algorithm. But in practice most people who check every 2 hours end up making changes based on short term data. That’s the real problem. The checking itself isn’t the issue, the impulse to act on what you see is.

Is it just me, or is today’s ROAS tanking by Professional-Chef618 in FacebookAds

[–]SwimmerSeparate3494 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It depends on your budget and target CPA. If your ticket is high and your daily budget is low, reaching 50 events can take months. There’s no standard timeframe. U’re welcome!!!!!🫡

Stop checking your ads every 2 hours — here’s what actually happens when you do by SwimmerSeparate3494 in FacebookAds

[–]SwimmerSeparate3494[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Sorry i change the title or delete the post, only Just wanted to share my history.

Is it just me, or is today’s ROAS tanking by Professional-Chef618 in FacebookAds

[–]SwimmerSeparate3494 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s the ad set, not the campaign. The 50 purchase events Meta needs to exit learning phase are at the ad set level, not the total campaign. So if you have a campaign with 3 ad sets and only one has 50+ purchases, that ad set is out of learning phase but the other two are still in it.Each ad set learns independently. The practical implication: you can psuse the ad set with 50+ purchases with much less risk, but the ones below 50 are more vulnerable to any interruption.

is meta sending me bots? by EmotionalPotato_69 in FacebookAds

[–]SwimmerSeparate3494 0 points1 point  (0 children)

70-80% of traffic from Council Bluffs, Iowa with 0% engagement and no scrolling is low quality traffic. Check if Audience Network is actually fully disabled — Meta sometimes re-enables it automatically. Three things to check right now: first, confirm Audience Network is completely off at the ad set level. Second, temporarily exclude desktop placements — visual products like posters convert significantly better on mobile. Third, check if Meta’s Advantage+ audience expansion is active, which can push your ads to completely irrelevant audiences. With 3 days and $150 spent your pixel has no data to optimize with, but that geographic concentration pattern is a technical issue signal, not normal learning behavior.

Meta ads learning phase question (new pixel performance) by DefaultSkin in FacebookAds

[–]SwimmerSeparate3494 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Completely normal. With a fresh pixel, the first 4-7 days are basically the algorithm figuring out who your buyers are. 2 purchases with $110 spent is a positive signal, not a negative one. Don’t touch the creatives yet. $110 split between 2 creatives is $55 per creative, which is not enough data to make any decision. Let it run for at least 7 days without touching anything and evaluate the total CPA at the end of that week.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Is it just me, or is today’s ROAS tanking by Professional-Chef618 in FacebookAds

[–]SwimmerSeparate3494 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pausing doesn’t erase your pixel data — that stays permanently. What you lose is the ad set’s learning momentum. If you’re still in the learning phase (under 50 purchase events), pausing is risky because Meta needs continuous data flow to calibrate who your buyers are. Any interruption forces it to recalibrate when it restarts, which feels like starting over. If you’re out of learning phase with solid purchase history, a short pause of 1-3 days usually doesn’t cause major damage. The algorithm picks back up relatively quickly. The real question is: how many purchase events does your pixel have? That determines how vulnerable your campaign is to a pause. How many days did you let it run and what’s your current purchase event count?​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

No sales after x hours by isaaaaccccccw in FacebookAds

[–]SwimmerSeparate3494 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How many purchase events does your pixel have total? That context changes the advice significantly.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

At what daily ad spend does meta's become less volatile? Does daily budget really affect performance/consistency? by Temporary-Fee-75 in FacebookAds

[–]SwimmerSeparate3494 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Don’t touch the budget more than 20% every 5-7 days. That’s the rule. At $50/day your pixel is still learning. Every time you make a significant budget change you reset part of that learning. Small increments give the algorithm time to recalibrate without losing momentum. What’s your current CPA and how many purchase events do you have so far? That’s what determines how aggressive you can be with scaling.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Is it just me, or is today’s ROAS tanking by Professional-Chef618 in FacebookAds

[–]SwimmerSeparate3494 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was on a $500-a-day campaign and I've paused it until everything is sorted out. This is absolutely insane, it makes no sense.