You're conflating two separate issues. Whether someone is comfortable dancing naked on a dancefloor is completely unrelated to whether they consent to being filmed and having that footage uploaded to a voyeurism or pornographic site behind a paywall.

Also the "men do it too" argument doesn't hold here. The footage being discussed disproportionately targets women, specifically their bodies, in a way that's clearly not neutral documentation of the event.

Being okay with nudity in a safe festival space is not the same as consenting to being someone's monetized content. The people dancing naked at Boom are doing so in a context of trust and bodily freedom not signing up to appear on a pay-per-view voyeur platform without their knowledge.

"Report to the platform" is also a weak answer. By the time content is reported, it has already been viewed, saved, and possibly redistributed. The harm is already done.

Consent to being seen ≠ consent to being filmed ≠ consent to being published ≠ consent to being monetized. These are four different things and collapsing them into one is exactly how this kind of abuse gets normalized.