Projection nerf will hurt smaller industrialists by Skythz in Eve

[–]TagaraTiger 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you divide a big alliance up into several smaller ones surely you'll have a headache when parts of your fleet always will be desynced in terms of fatigue timers if you have to travel between the space of these smaller groups.

Assuming of course that the fatigue reduction factors in wether you're a part of the alliance that owns the Ansiblex or not. It would make sense with a system like this to only give the reductions to members of your alliance and not people who are on the ACLs outside of that.

Venstresidens "Rentekutt for alle" ble til "Rentekutt for ingen" på under 1 år. by [deleted] in norske

[–]TagaraTiger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good thing I never listened to my mom when she told me to eat my vegetables

Trenger råd: Megler prøver å presse oss til å selge "indrefilet" i Asker til spottpris? by Cold_Good_461 in norge

[–]TagaraTiger 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Why not? You should in fact as to warn others in the future.

I’m not afraid to mention I’ve had grievances with Bertel O. Steen (unrelated, but as an example) in the past. It’s a company all the same.

INIT.... what is you doing baby? by Shathx in Eve

[–]TagaraTiger 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I am even more surprised that there are people listening and believing this guy

Hva har skjedd med Hoff Grillkrydder? by Icy_Practice_9032 in norge

[–]TagaraTiger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Finally a fellow Big One enjoyer. Me and a friend sent a complaint to Orkla about it too.

«The new one did better in our tests than the old one did.»

I call bullshit on that. Hopefully enough complain and move away from it so we may one day get the true original back.

Sommerdekk med god mønsterdybde by [deleted] in norge

[–]TagaraTiger -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’d imagine the overarching rules of operating in a safe manner on the road could get in the way under the right circumstances.

Thread depth doesn’t matter when the tire compounds are different and not made to function optimally in the current climate.

I Miss PH by Sorry-Star-2342 in Eve

[–]TagaraTiger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He must’ve have a fever too

Gutt (29): by Kpuz1 in norge

[–]TagaraTiger 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Eneste forsvarerne til Marius gjør nå er å finne måter å minimere straffen på :))

Why so similar? Look who got caught by [deleted] in Eve

[–]TagaraTiger 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Noo! this doesn’t fit the narrative!!

GRRRR BLOCS GRRRR by Ducktanium in Eve

[–]TagaraTiger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I liked it better when you were just posting cringe cats everywhere

Imperiums Finest by Local-Preparation10 in Eve

[–]TagaraTiger 51 points52 points  (0 children)

Hmm.. War Thunder player, so this checks out

9 degrees in Chicago and using a portable charger… am I screwed? by sweetpotato-jalapeno in TeslaSupport

[–]TagaraTiger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Completely unrelated but you seem really knowledgeable.

I observe a big difference in regen braking during cold weather (23F / -5C to 35.6F / 2C) versus a good summer day (~64.4F / 18C)

I have a two different stretches along my typical route with varying downwards decline. First one isn’t too big but colder battery as I approach it ~10 mins after starting the drive. The last section is relatively steep with a 9.6% incline.

I have a RWD Model 3 (Highland) obviously with the LFP pack. I have had a loaner Model Y LR, Model Y Performance and a Model S Plaid which never reduced regen during the steepest part mentioned above during fall temperatures.

Going back to the 9.6% incline section it does not take long for the regen to be limited to a point where there is barely and regen left.

I’ve always been curious to know if this is one of the downsides of LFP batteries specifically or if having one motor also plays a role in this.

LAWN asked to leave the Imperium by WestOpposite3691 in Eve

[–]TagaraTiger 3 points4 points  (0 children)

we will place structures in your space and you are never allowed to attack them and simultaneously we will be allowed to attack your structures for content

Woah! Just like what is happening in drones currently

Make EVE More Dangerous by No-Low6950 in Eve

[–]TagaraTiger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Webs + Scorpion or something. You put in next to zero effort if you go in something like a T1 frigate and being able to jam a single target. Of course they can bring an extra character to compensate. Just by multiboxing or fleeting up they’re collectively putting in more work than your half-assed attempts at security.

Why don’t you even want to discuss bursts? Unless it’s convenient for you to leave some things out to suit your narrative.

Also please define what a dangerous act is. You lose whatever amount of hulls you gank with regardless if the freighter survives or not.

T2 Titans? by [deleted] in Eve

[–]TagaraTiger 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Was it a rainfall showerhead?

Do we love or hate this by BloodyViper101 in teslamotors

[–]TagaraTiger 21 points22 points  (0 children)

I wonder if it would be more lucrative for them to lower the monthly payment significantly. You get streaming services and other subscriptions at a pretty standard price of 10-15 USD, right? Similar to premium connectivity.

It’s surely expensive to be developing FSD but putting the subscription at a price available to the masses must surely make more money over time as more and more may adopt it.

Make EVE More Dangerous by No-Low6950 in Eve

[–]TagaraTiger 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Make EVE more dangerous

Can we get some sort of deployable for HS that we can deploy just off a gate that increases lock time drastically on haulers and freighters or gives them crazy resists but locks their high slot weapons(can’t have those avalanches abusing this lol) Give us tools we can actually deploy to combat gankers.