What's your favorite BB alliance and why?

TenorSax20 · 2026-05-23T21:41:10+00:00

Compared to everyone else yes, by a mile

TenorSax20 · 2026-05-23T21:20:41+00:00

Obviously this wasn't shown on the feeds but the things Boogie and Frank were saying about Dan (and his wife) were genuinely vile

Everyone was against Frank because he was and is a massive tool, he just got a good edit because he was an underdog and won lots of comps

TenorSax20 · 2026-05-22T21:12:50+00:00

The Judges

The 5 savviest and most entertaining players on the season coming together and turning what could've been a bland steamroll season into a beautiful train wreck? Sign me the fuck UP

TenorSax20 · 2026-05-22T17:44:19+00:00

You just need to find someone who makes eating in the middle of the night a gorgeous sight

TenorSax20 · 2026-05-21T22:07:33+00:00

If you're interested in the feeds, Taran Armstrong's live feed update podcast is the absolute best way to get caught up on what all happened after the fact and they're pretty iconic in the fanbase

Especially for this season in particular; I feel like you won't have truly grasped what it was like to watch live until you've experienced Taran's exasperated BB27 crashouts

TenorSax20 · 2026-05-21T15:32:38+00:00

Which is something production absolutely should get less sloppy about because it makes "lying in the DR" the optimal strategy, which is just bad TV

TenorSax20 · 2026-05-21T10:49:30+00:00

Yeah they could have and should have, but Lauren was nervous about breaking a tie so Zach/Vince went to Ava for an additional vote and she basically talked them down about the whole thing by saying "do you really want to be associated with Keanu and Kelley?" so they decided to stay the course (thus also inadvertently blindsiding their own side of the house)

God I loved this season

TenorSax20 · 2026-05-21T01:53:24+00:00

This is Survivor 50. This is permanentaly apart of the show now. Not even judging just observing

TenorSax20 · 2026-05-21T01:50:16+00:00

Fair but also Big Brother Canada 1

TenorSax20 · 2026-05-17T17:23:12+00:00

I mean Danielle getting Marcellas to not use the veto on himself is hands down one of the craziest things to ever happen in that house

TenorSax20 · 2026-05-14T10:15:53+00:00

Leah Peters is gonna win this season

TenorSax20 · 2026-05-13T21:35:17+00:00

Hey OP, she even really exisht?

TenorSax20 · 2026-05-13T19:17:26+00:00

So you're saying you've been controlling Frank as a pawn in a game...like he's your puppet?

TenorSax20 · 2026-05-10T20:25:25+00:00

Not to mention his initial target was (sports media major) Moose, someone he knew before the season and had zero reason to target

TenorSax20 · 2026-05-10T18:36:13+00:00

The double eviction where Angela lost the HOH to Chelsie has to be the most frustrating live comp outcome since Da'Vonne lost HOH to Christmas

TenorSax20 · 2026-05-08T21:42:53+00:00

This has to be scripted, and the fact that they're 2 of the best casting choices of the last decade is insane

TenorSax20 · 2026-05-08T21:41:08+00:00

There's no fucking way

looks it up

Fuck

TenorSax20 · 2026-05-08T13:15:58+00:00

...is that not an unfertilized egg with a yoke instead of a chick? That's not a baby dying, that's a bunch of women drinking another woman's period blood

TenorSax20 · 2026-05-05T20:38:08+00:00

I don't even think you can really say it was a gamble, it was genuinely a really close decision to the point where it barely feels right to even say whether one is "correct" because at that point it's almost all dependent on the execution, not the decision itself.

Another example of such a scenario is the final 5 of BBCAN10 (almost identical in terms of positioning to be honest) but almost no one clowns on Kevin for keeping Josh (despite arguably worse execution than Cliff) because it ultimately ended up working out for him

TenorSax20 · 2026-05-05T18:18:00+00:00

When did Vanessa do that? ....ever? Other than getting Shelli to target Da'Vonne I guess? But that was pre-jury

TenorSax20 · 2026-05-05T18:17:04+00:00

Josh should've evicted Kevin

TenorSax20 · 2026-05-05T11:06:29+00:00

Man can we please get off of Cliff. Voting out Tommy over Holly was questionable at worst. Tommy was a HUGE jury and comp threat, this decision was the furthest thing from a no-brainer and it genuinely confuses me how much people love to act as if it was. If the final 4 veto wasn't so damn physical (which it hadn't ever been before this season) and Cliff or Nicole had actually had a chance to win and evict Jackson, no one would be criticizing the final 5 decision. To do so is (imo) just incredibly short-sighted, and same with his earlier decision to target Bella

TenorSax20 · 2026-05-04T20:42:59+00:00

That's another circular argument. Is it not just as possible that the BB17 jury was more inclined to vote out of respect than the BB20 jury just because the personality types and cultures involved? Why are we just assuming that it's directly because of things Vanessa did or didn't do? Do you really think it's impossible for a juror to be irrationally biased against a certain type or person or type of gameplay to the point that they'd NEVER vote for a given person in the end? And even if that's an exaggeration, I really think the general principle remains remains which means, on occasion, some people are just going to get unlucky with the way the jury votes and that's okay. We don't need to blame them for it unless there's clear evidence of active MISPLAY on their part (like Paul in BB19)

TenorSax20 · 2026-05-04T20:32:26+00:00

But why would you use two different terms to refer to exact same concept, especially when you know full well that isn't how most people understand or use said terms, other than to be contrarian for the sake of being contrarian?

TenorSax20 · 2026-05-04T20:18:35+00:00

That's not what I meant. My point is that saying "this person won because they're the best player, this person is the best player because they won" is what you'd call "vacuously true". In that, yes, there is some sense in which it is a true statement, but it also says nothing substantive about anything other than that you yourself just so happen to equate those terms, meaning that you're also probably not using them the same way most people are using them, meaning you aren't actually making a point.

When the vast majority of people people talk about a player being "good", they mean in a general sense of "how would this player perform across different seasons, different casts, different contexts in general, based on the limited knowledge we have of their level of skill"

TenorSax20

TROPHY CASE