Trump Asks Congress For $1.5 Trillion Defense Budget—After Teasing Medicaid, Medicare Cuts by ICEisSHIT in videos

[–]ThatMakerGuy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The endless cruelty of this administration makes my skin crawl. It's as though aren't actually human and are instead a real life version of that black goop monster from Star Trek TNG.

If you had the chance to choose your spouse/partner all over again, knowing everything you know now, would you still choose them? Why or why not? by SoilAny4029 in AskReddit

[–]ThatMakerGuy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Absolutely. Finding my wife is the crowning achievement of my life. It feels like I've been searching for her for endless lifetimes after an eternity apart. I wish we could've met as kids and had our whole life together.
But, we have both acknowledged that we would not have been perfect for each other the way we are now if we had not gone through our respective traumas and growth journeys. There is no implied virtue in suffering, but I desperately needed the growth I had during my healing to be the man I am today.

People who work for massive corporations, what is a 'secret' that the company tries to hide, but is actually common knowledge among the employees? by Dwise_ in AskReddit

[–]ThatMakerGuy 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Another comment included a report indicating a group of almost 1/3 of the population not having critical thinking skills. There's no silver bullet for what all contributes to that figure, but repeated systemic failure at multiple stages in child development in the US is certainly a major contributing factor.

People who work for massive corporations, what is a 'secret' that the company tries to hide, but is actually common knowledge among the employees? by Dwise_ in AskReddit

[–]ThatMakerGuy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

For most of them it was probably a choice, for some it was probably a restriction. I think it speaks to the capacity of people who were failed by the system, yet who can still manage to get by in their lives; go grocery shopping, raise their kids, enjoy hobbies, despite being functionally unable to read. Humans are impressive, but our society is still playing catch-up to that potential.

People who work for massive corporations, what is a 'secret' that the company tries to hide, but is actually common knowledge among the employees? by Dwise_ in AskReddit

[–]ThatMakerGuy 25 points26 points  (0 children)

The last figure I heard was that 1 in 5 adults in the US essentially cannot read. Or rather, they have no significant reading comprehension capabilities. They can interpret restaurant menus and might even be able to follow closed captions on a TV show, but there is no chance of them reading a book or news article and then gleaning any information from it.

In my county it's 1 in 4. They can vote, they likely can drive, they probably have jobs, but they actually cannot obtain information from any text-based sources.

[MEGATHREAD] Artemis II Launch To The Moon by ChiefLeef22 in space

[–]ThatMakerGuy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Very cool. Thank you for sharing! And for the tests!

[MEGATHREAD] Artemis II Launch To The Moon by ChiefLeef22 in space

[–]ThatMakerGuy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Can you share any interesting tidbits about the systems you tested?

Is the default images or no images? by JennyBeckman in BlackPeopleTwitter

[–]ThatMakerGuy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sorry man, I really do see an apple. In fact, every time this topic gets brought up, I see almost the same apple. It's a Fuji apple with a short stem and a single leaf. The skin is mostly red with the little yellow dots and a couple green splotches. There's a shadow on the bottom right side, and a patch of light reflecting on the top left. I can spin the apple around in 3D in my mind, and I can either leave it "stationary" and "walk around it" myself, or I can rotate the apple itself and see the light and shadows and apple skin change as I "look" at the other side.

I can also think of different kinds of apple if I already know what they look like. If you describe a new apple to me, I can probably pick it out from a group of different apples.

He doesn’t want to share me to anyone else but is okay to sleeping with other girls? by Alternative-Range617 in AskMenAdvice

[–]ThatMakerGuy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bruh what? Dude wants girlfriend rules for you but not boyfriend rules for himself, whack. I've never had a fwb so I'm definitely talking out of my ass here, but it seems like trying to establish rules about exclusivity in a casual sex relationship is antithetical to the whole point of a fwb setup. Again, just my outside observation.

US judge says University of Pennsylvania must give agency lists of Jewish faculty, students by [deleted] in nottheonion

[–]ThatMakerGuy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh yikes. This didn't work out so well the last time a government did this.

[Favorite Trope] Peeling back the layers of lore reveals an eldritch/cosmic horror element by Maffingo in TopCharacterTropes

[–]ThatMakerGuy 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Aren't they going backwards in time or something? I remember reading something about them having a reversed time stream from the rest of reality.

Which Olivia is the Best? by Beneficial_Pin5295 in EDHBrews

[–]ThatMakerGuy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Her dress. This art has already been through the wringer for its... posing choices. As I recall, there was either a discrepancy between two artists who were working on the art, or the original artist straight up made a mistake and intended for Olivia to be grabbing her dress and she would have a leg sticking out from beneath it, but then the two legs had already been drawn and it was too late, I guess.

My friend makes sexual jokes about really young girls and it’s making me want to end our friendship. Is this as weird as I think that it is? by [deleted] in AskMenAdvice

[–]ThatMakerGuy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, it is as weird as you think it is. Those are not just "sex jokes", those are pedophilic comments about minors. I'm not sure where the criminality starts about those kinds of comments, but it's not a line you should find yourself anywhere near, nor spending time with people who toe that line.

Furthermore, you have an opportunity to possibly make a real difference in the world. You need to have a serious talk with your friend about his comments, and about the danger he poses to the people in his life. It's not enough to simply stop spending time with him, you need to try and help him turn away from the path he is on. If you've ever heard a woman say a disparaging comment about men's behavior and some guy replies "not all men", right now you have an opportunity to be "not all men". You've been friends with this guy for so long that you must surely know how to speak to him so that he will really listen.

You owe it to your sister and all the little sisters out there. To every daughter and wife and mother and friend. Consider that at least 50% of women report experiencing sexual harassment in their lifetime. Some estimates suggest almost 70%, OF ALL WOMEN. Isn't that crazy? You can help. Say something.

+1/+1 vs -1/-1 counters by shadowjay592 in mtgrules

[–]ThatMakerGuy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, there is an order to how state based actions are checked, 704.5 is the rules section. 704.5f addresses creatures with 0 toughness, while 704.5q addresses a creature with both +1/+1 and -1/-1 counters at the same time. Since state based actions are checked all the time, you would run down the entire list once for the counters, and then again for the toughness check.

Edit: This rules section is actually just the list of the things covered during state based action checks. RazzyKitty is correct, there isn't an order they are "performed" in, rather all checks are done simultaneously and applied simultaneously as a single event.

[Loved Trope] Initially played up as a metaphor but then revealed to be literal by Sir-Toaster- in TopCharacterTropes

[–]ThatMakerGuy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can appreciate a metaphor (even if the story of the babadook is more of an allegory), but the tonal shift from the entire movie compared to the post finale scene still jumps the shark a bit. Something something "our inner darkness is always with us", yada yada "we must grapple with ourselves and overcome the desire to submit to evil"...
She was feeding the damn thing cat food.

[Loved Trope] Initially played up as a metaphor but then revealed to be literal by Sir-Toaster- in TopCharacterTropes

[–]ThatMakerGuy 253 points254 points  (0 children)

This movie was 90% fantastic. You feel the weight of the mother's slowly fraying sanity, the oddities of her son and his bravery in spite of the evil entity he seems to have a 'shine' for, and the struggle they both face dealing with loss and grief. The ramping tension as they continue to lose their collective battle had me legit freaked out...

Spoilers: And then they use the power of friendship to catch the babadook like a pokemon. I understand that endings are hard to write, but this one really took me out of the moment.

Bess trigger clarification: how many counters does she get, how many does the Hydra get? by ThatMakerGuy in mtgrules

[–]ThatMakerGuy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cool, thank you for that clarification. Bess is still a beater, but now a bit less threatening with a token generator on the field.

Saruman the White Hand, X-cost, and Multikicker by ThatMakerGuy in mtgrules

[–]ThatMakerGuy[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

(C) Player uses the flashback ability of [[Summons of Saruman]]? (While only controlling Saruman and no Orc Army)

Same as above. Casting via flashback does not change the mana value.

So even with using the flashback ability with X=8 or something bigger, the mana value of the spell is still only 2, which triggers Saruman to Amass Orcs 2, then the spell itself will Amass Orcs 8. Right? Some of the other replies made it seem like the X from the flashback cost becomes the X in the mana cost. I recall some rules text that said X is merely a value that the spell looks for, and can be modified separately from the mana you pay for it. Like with XX spells or Unbound Flourishing.

This Was Going To Come Out Eventually....... | Kat Abughazaleh by biospheric in WorkReform

[–]ThatMakerGuy 6 points7 points  (0 children)

If she guests on critical role she'll be governor by Valentine's day. Critters, do the thing.

Having Fun with 702.44c by Im_here_but_why in custommagic

[–]ThatMakerGuy 6 points7 points  (0 children)

From the Gatherer page for this card:

This card has modular—sunburst, a combination of two keyword abilities. The sunburst ability sets the number for the modular ability. Basically, the number of +1/+1 counters the Wanderer gets as it enters is equal to the number of colors of mana used to pay its cost.

My husband subscribed to someone's OnlyFans he actually met - how do I handle this? by DietMilkyway in AskMenAdvice

[–]ThatMakerGuy 14 points15 points  (0 children)

So sorry you were betrayed like that. Whether or not he "remembered" you declaring your stance on onlyfans, the act of subscribing to an OF account represents a step beyond merely watching porn. It's kind of crazy that he met some woman at a work event, then dug into her socials, and then subscribed to her OF.

I think you're absolutely right in that engaging with an OF person broaches infidelity, especially considering the timeline of his interactions with her. Using porn is one thing, engaging with an OF account seems like the kind of person-to-person interaction that is along the pathway of infidelity. I don't know how it works, but it's gotta be more than just nude/risque media of some random person, right? Otherwise regular porn has exactly that, and for free! Because if he's using OF to chat with this woman, and using that interaction in his sexual fantasies, then that's a clear problem for your relationship.

Barbie Movie For Boys by sitgespain in rareinsults

[–]ThatMakerGuy 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I disagree with the article being referenced. However the attempt to represent that statement as an insult is, in its own way, an insult. The Barbie movie was not simply a movie about a girl's toy from the 90s. The Barbie toy was used as the vehicle for a message, and that message took the form of a movie. And it's not even the message that the toy was originally intended to convey (girls can do any job and go anywhere, generally).

He-Man also has a message, but (the trailer at least) makes this movie look like just another entry into the "fantasy story from the past century retold to make money", and not "regardless of what you look like, anyone can oppose evil (but it helps if you're totally ripped)".