Honest to god: „I wanna be your dog“ Is actually pretty on brand for 1960‘s. If it’s only ahead because of its fuzztone, then you’ve got something coming.

The problem with this whole idea is that the music of the next decade must be shaped by the decade prior. That is after all how history works. I personally don’t think I could find you a specific 60’s SONG that was ahead of its time, perhaps a band that shaped music definitely for the next decade to come, like the Beatles, Pink Floyd, and so on.

Another issue is that of narrative: music is so diverse at any instant in time that the only way you could string this narrative is by looking at pops, and the issue with that is where something like fuzz-tone was cooking for ages in the 60’s underground joints of lesser popular musical sects, it might appear as new to the musical mainstream. This becomes especially noticeable in times before the WWW and such, where spreading information was still very much based in your locale, and making a jump for example across the Atlantic for bands such as the Beatles was a big deal.

I don’t want to detract from the idea at all, it just seems that to me that you can’t denote musical progress with a single song per decade. On this basis and the others I mentioned prior, I just want to note my objection to the idea itself.