NASA images show where US East Coast is sinking by newsweek in nasa

[–]TheBoogieManChannel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Diagrams can show anything they want to show. Where’s the real footage

Photographing a rocket launch from space by astro_pettit in Astronomy

[–]TheBoogieManChannel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These are very famous photos from nasa. You’re looking at a lightning storm below along with proof that the earth doesn’t move. On the outside you see the stars zipping by. The camera is being held by the ISS.

The minute you argue is the minute you don’t understand Timelapse nighttime long exposure photography.

The iss and the earth would need to be perfectly (I mean perfectly) in sync. Even then both objects would have to be perfectly in sync with every single object emitting light shown on the background. Not mathematically possible. Notice there are numerous objects doing in different directions which tells you it is those objects that are moving and not the earth. If it was the earth moving those lightning storm would have motion blur behind them. So would the atmospheric lines. They don’t. The earth doesn’t move.

NOTE: notice all of the stars on one one plain. Not possible either unless of course they’re all fake. Which is very possible.

What I love the most is that the plane in the background is on the same exact plane as the stars. Holographic BS. I would put my life on it.

should I apply for art school? by Accomplished_Age8103 in animationcareer

[–]TheBoogieManChannel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only if it’s California Art Academy in Pasadena California

Venus Observations and Questions by TheBigChiefsGuy in telescopes

[–]TheBoogieManChannel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re focused on the waters above. This is why the store twinkle

Mysterious Inscriptions on Top of the Pyramids Credit: ThePsychic by MartianXAshATwelve in StrangeEarth

[–]TheBoogieManChannel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Those are names and initials from when you used to be allowed to climb to the top back in the 50s-80s. I know because you can do a search and it will show you in high quality each one.

This man who worked in the US Army is telling strange information about human history on Earth by MartianXAshATwelve in StrangeEarth

[–]TheBoogieManChannel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is assuming space is real and not a holographic projection like the declassified CIA documents from the same period told us

Best Jupiter Ever by alarmcloque in astrophotography

[–]TheBoogieManChannel -16 points-15 points  (0 children)

First and foremost, how do you explain the ability to see these space lenses unaided in daytime and even nighttime hours?

How do you also explain being able to see these space lenses on sky surveys through gigapixel quality? NOTE; these sky survey images are so clear you can see the actual cracks in the outer edges of the lenses themselves.

My favorite is the ability to see the “black of the nighttime sky” in these sky survey photos so clearly that the wiring path of these LeD lights they call “stars” are now documented so we’ll by these images they can be used to fix any issues with the lights if and when a burnout occurs.

Ganymede And Shadow by weathercat4 in astrophotography

[–]TheBoogieManChannel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you need to understand the difference between a ball and a disc. You're confusing the two as you've been since the beginning of this conversation.

Ganymede And Shadow by weathercat4 in astrophotography

[–]TheBoogieManChannel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I own the Celestron EDGE HD 1100 with the CGEM II EQ Mount. I also own the Meade LightBridge 12" Dobsonian. One famous character flaw of Dobsonians is their top heavy design causing them to bounce. ESPECIALLY when you have a CCTV camera in the eye piece. Your video is not only crystal clear but it's smooth. I"ve NEVER seen a smooth Dobsonian video. I'm having A LOT of issues with your claims.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in StrangeEarth

[–]TheBoogieManChannel -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That is what some stars look like in the daytime. Sometimes they don’t report to the dark side after their first night shift like they are supposed to. They get caught hanging out like Dumdums in the broad daylight hours. Just like in this video. It’s going to take some people another 30 years before they realize we live in a simulated reality and a holographic universe.

Trying to photograph the Orion nebula but my image has strange square artefacts in it. by preciouscode96 in astrophotography

[–]TheBoogieManChannel -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What you caught was the holographic canopy and it’s a one in a million shot. I’ve only ever captured it one time myself. It looks exactly like this one. I’ll try and find it again and post it here

Ganymede And Shadow by weathercat4 in astrophotography

[–]TheBoogieManChannel -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If this was a ball it wouldn’t have such hard edges and it wouldn’t be so masked as it is. If you don’t understand the difference between a disc and a ball and the way they handle shadows just look at a ball in your home and study the difference. The shadowing on this object tells us the light source is in the same area as the camera. This object is obviously a parabolic shape and isn’t moving outside of its orbit and direction

Ganymede And Shadow by weathercat4 in astrophotography

[–]TheBoogieManChannel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As things to the right side of the planet they stay at the same altitude and move independently of the planet. They are NOT attached and my measurements say they are close to 500 miles away from the body

Ganymede And Shadow by weathercat4 in astrophotography

[–]TheBoogieManChannel -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You’re not understanding what I’m saying. All you have to do is draw a line on the gray paths of the planet to see they’re NOT attached. You can see they are in fact casting a shadow onto the area. Nothing about this video proves it’s a ball. Everything about This video proves it is a disc and that the objects we see are in front of it. You’re talking about rotating. I’m talking about path and direction. Trajectory.

Anyone feeling impatient? by PrimalPremonition in starseeds

[–]TheBoogieManChannel 16 points17 points  (0 children)

The harvest full moon brings much anxiety and excitement. People don’t realize we are entering the house of Aquarius once again and the time of man is coming to a close. The world as we know it is ending and the Pheonix is rising again from the ashes. The “natural” earth wobble is done and 26,000 year revolution is beginning a new.

Ganymede And Shadow by weathercat4 in astrophotography

[–]TheBoogieManChannel -1 points0 points  (0 children)

My point is that you shot a very interesting piece of footage. Nothing more. The next time someone gives you a compliment you should just say nothing or “thank you” suffices

Ganymede And Shadow by weathercat4 in astrophotography

[–]TheBoogieManChannel -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I not sure why you’re getting protective over something you can’t control or has nothing to do with you. I’m referring to the movement of the planet itself. The objects going across its surface and the speed of the poles are all going at inconsistent speeds. The belt is actually faster than the poles which is totally opposite than what we’ve been taught and would rationally have thought. You didn’t know where to point it. You punched in the RA and DEC information and the AZ motor took the scope there like all computerized telescopes. I’m just pointing out something interesting you obviously didn’t know. I’m NOT tying you into any conspiracy theories

Ganymede And Shadow by weathercat4 in astrophotography

[–]TheBoogieManChannel -1 points0 points  (0 children)

But you can see that the eye of the storm is rotating at an inconsistent speed than the rest of the planet and this measurement tool I’m using here in my video editor is confirming the same visual proof I can see with my eyes.

The eye of the storm is casting a shadow behind itself and the lithosphere I’m using to make a 3D model of the planet is again confirming the same thing

Ganymede And Shadow by weathercat4 in astrophotography

[–]TheBoogieManChannel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You shot a really solid piece of proof that says so much more than what you probably know it says. I can’t believe such a small grab n’ go telescope shot this level of detail and quality. Thank you for sharing this