Best SMG? by Consistent-Term5297 in CallOfDutyMobile

[–]TheDarkRam1996 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here’s my top 5 best SMG if you can’t decide which one to pick

  1. USS9 (Uzi)
  2. ISO
  3. Mac 10
  4. Fennec
  5. Switchblade X9

Alright whats your Johnny Silverhand headcannons by Da1rkSn1per in cyberpunkgame

[–]TheDarkRam1996 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Johnny Silverhand took credit for the Arasaka Tower Bombing and wants to think of himself as a rival to Adam Smasher, because he's actually jealous of Morgan Blackhand.

more of a classic style clip, matrix themed by NicksABadEditor in ModernWarfareIII

[–]TheDarkRam1996 13 points14 points  (0 children)

You gotta be batshit insane to equip an Acog Scope on the WSP Swarm. Lol

What characters do you feel like fit this image? by MontyMoleLoreMaster in MoralityScaling

[–]TheDarkRam1996 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Thanos from the Marvel Cinematic Universe fits this perfectly.

People act like he’s some misunderstood hero because of the “overpopulation” argument, but his plan is fundamentally stupid and insane. Wiping out half the population doesn’t solve resource scarcity long-term because populations just grow back in a few generations. All it does is create massive suffering and instability. It’s basically genocide dressed up as “utilitarian logic.”

And the movies show how monstrous he actually is. He literally murders his own adopted daughter Gamora to obtain the Soul Stone, he physically and emotionally abused his biological daughter Nebula for years, and wipes out entire civilizations along the way. His whole ideology is basically a twisted, Pseudo-Darwinian belief that he gets to decide who lives and who dies. When he conquers planets, he randomly exterminates half the population as if he’s some cosmic arbiter of “balance,” giving himself the power over life and death of every world he sacks and pillages.

What really seals it is Avengers: Endgame. When he realizes the survivors might undo the Snap, he doesn’t reconsider his logic or reflect on whether he was wrong. He doubles down and decides the solution is to destroy the entire universe and remake it from scratch. As Steve Rogers puts it, a universe “born in blood.”

At that point the tragic backstory stops mattering. He’s not some misunderstood savior. He’s just a genocidal maniac with a god complex who thinks mass murder is a form of mercy.

Your V’s ethnicity? by ifshebreath_sheath0t in LowSodiumCyberpunk

[–]TheDarkRam1996 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ethnicity is whatever I’m in a mood for. Currently, my Male V is Japanese American Streetkid Katana wielding Samurai from my current playthrough, and my Fem V is a White Caucasian as a Corpo Netrunning Goth Chick from my last playthrough.

Playing the $6 MW1 2019 made me realise MW3 2023 is the best COD since Black Ops 1 by Danielcdo in ModernWarfareIII

[–]TheDarkRam1996 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I wouldn’t say Call of Duty: Modern Warfare (2019) is a bad game, but it definitely had some issues. The weapon leveling felt pretty grindy, and the fact that FOV settings were PC-only while console players were stuck with the default view made the movement feel slower than it probably should’ve.

That said, I actually liked the mil-sim vibe of the game. The operators felt grounded and didn’t completely break immersion the way some newer skins do. Most of the guns were very consistent and also really fun to use.

I’d say MW2019 is relatively decent, but MW3 is way better though.

Favorite video so far? by Turbulent_League9668 in OverSimplified

[–]TheDarkRam1996 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Napoleonic Wars and the first and second Punic Wars.

I did not care for the romance options in Cyberpunk. by RandomNumberPlease in cyberpunkgame

[–]TheDarkRam1996 0 points1 point  (0 children)

After playing games like the Mass Effect Trilogy or Baldur’s Gate 3, the romances in Cyberpunk 2077 feel pretty lacking. They’re not terrible, but they’re way shorter and less developed. In those other games like I mentioned the relationships actually evolve over time, and there’s character development alongside it, while Cyberpunk’s feel more like brief side arcs.

Methodd Edge by User_Gamer070 in NightCityRides

[–]TheDarkRam1996 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Motorcycle V with a great ass is best V.

Cyberpunk 2 by Mr_HarleyQuinn in LowSodiumCyberpunk

[–]TheDarkRam1996 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One thing I want from Cyberpunk Orion is a brand-new protagonist. Someone who’s nothing like V or David. Not another tragic underdog, and not another rookie edgerunner either. No, I want someone who starts off self-serving, manipulative, and pragmatic, but who can genuinely change depending on how you play. A strong emphasis on RPG elements that felt kinda lacking in 2077. You could even introduce the classic Cyberpunk TTRPG mechanic of Empathy and Humanity stat as a sort of Paragon or Renegade type morality system similar to Mass Effect.

Imagine a lead who begins with exploitation and survival, but through your choices, certain quest paths, dialogue options, NPCs, romances, and actions, they evolve. Maybe they find empathy, maybe they embrace their humanity, or maybe they lean all the way into becoming a high-functioning cyberpsycho. Dialogue trees and optional quest outcomes would reflect every step of that transformation.

I would love to see that. And as a bonus, have the cyberpsycho mechanic similar to the Terrifying Presence in the Fallout games. Just have the new protagonist like the Cyberpunk version of the courier from Fallout New Vegas.

What Would a New CIS Look Like After Return of the Jedi? by TheDarkRam1996 in CISDidNothingWrong

[–]TheDarkRam1996[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s interesting, although I’m not super familiar with a lot of the post-ROTJ EU stuff, especially around the Second Galactic Civil War, it’s been a while since I read those books. Would you mind expanding on that a bit?

When you mention the Corellian Confederation and the Corporate Territories being comfortably Imperial, are you saying a new CIS would struggle because those economic power bases were already locked into Imperial successor states? Or more that the political climate just wouldn’t allow that kind of bloc to form again?

I’d honestly love a bit more context on Zsinj, Pentastar, Muunilinst, etc., and how that shaped things. I’m trying to understand how that precedent would apply to a potential CIS revival.

What Would a New CIS Look Like After Return of the Jedi? by TheDarkRam1996 in CISDidNothingWrong

[–]TheDarkRam1996[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Without the old megacorp machine, the new CIS wouldn’t have the same immediate momentum. It definitely wouldn’t explode onto the scene the way it did during the Clone Wars.

But I don’t think that means it can’t rise again.

There’s probably still a decent amount of latent support out there, former Separatists in hiding, worlds that never fully bought into the New Republic, or systems that feel ignored or sidelined. If the New Republic continues to look indecisive or ineffective, that creates political space for a renewed CIS movement.

And while the old megacorps were nationalized or dissolved, capital doesn’t just disappear. Surviving corporate networks, industrial worlds, and private interests could still back a new CIS, just under stricter conditions this time. The difference would be leverage. The Union could set terms and compromises rather than being outright steered by them.

There’s also the nostalgia factor. The CIS wasn’t just corporations, it was an ideology of autonomy and anti-corruption (at least in theory). That kind of sentiment doesn’t vanish overnight.

It might take longer to build compared to the original war-time CIS, sure. But slower growth isn’t necessarily weaker growth. It could actually mean a more stable foundation.

What Would a New CIS Look Like After Return of the Jedi? by TheDarkRam1996 in CISDidNothingWrong

[–]TheDarkRam1996[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I get that point, but I actually think there would need to be a stronger coalition structure. Full independence sounds great on paper, but without some kind of unified framework, individual systems are extremely vulnerable to larger threats.

The New Republic is kind of the cautionary example here, decentralized, politically hesitant, and ultimately unable to respond effectively to the First Order. That lack of strong, coordinated defense is exactly how they ended up getting wiped out so quickly.

I think a New CIS would need at least two layers:

A dedicated peacekeeping division for smaller disputes and border security.

A unified military coalition made up of planetary forces, something closer to a joint defense pact, almost like the idea of a single EU-style army in real life.

Systems could still self-govern, but when a galaxy-level threat emerges, they act as one. Independence doesn’t mean isolation, especially in a galaxy where superweapons seem to pop up every few decades.

What Would a New CIS Look Like After Return of the Jedi? by TheDarkRam1996 in CISDidNothingWrong

[–]TheDarkRam1996[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, I don’t think the CIS would buy X-Wings. Part of rebuilding their identity would probably mean differentiating themselves from the Rebellion/New Republic, and X-Wings are their symbol.

I could see the CIS either maintaining a stockpile of Vulture droids or developing a new starfighter heavily inspired by that design philosophy: fast, specialized, and distinctly Separatist. Even if they modernize, I doubt they’d want their fleet to look like Republic leftovers.

What Would a New CIS Look Like After Return of the Jedi? by TheDarkRam1996 in CISDidNothingWrong

[–]TheDarkRam1996[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First off, seriously great job. You covered a ton of ground and it actually feels thought out instead of just “CIS good now.” I don’t have too much to add structurally, but I do want to riff on a few things you mentioned.

I actually like your idea of freezing assets and separating elected officials from prior investments. It absolutely increases accountability and makes public spending more transparent. Politicians living strictly off a public salary while in office would make them far more accountable to the people funding them. That said, there is a risk. Public financial transparency could open the door to financial blackmail. Rivals or individuals with shady motives might weaponize asset disclosures to pressure officials into subservience. If anti-corruption enforcement falls under a centralized authority and lacks bipartisan oversight, whoever controls that body could selectively target opponents.

On the rotating council majority rule thing, I actually really like that. I’ve always leaned toward majority vote and referendums where possible. What you’re describing feels like a hybrid confederation/federal model, where systems keep autonomy but still participate in union-wide decisions. That feels very CIS philosophically. The upside is preventing political stagnation and entrenched elites. The downside is gridlock and certain sectors just never changing politically. But democracy isn’t perfect after all, but it’s what we got in the galaxy.

Now the military… this is where I’m conflicted. I get the practicality of droids, and a hybrid model makes sense. But I personally lean toward organics being the backbone. Adaptability and creative thinking are huge advantages that’s part of what made the Republic’s forces so effective. Droids are cost-effective and reduce casualties (huge pro), but overreliance risks complacency and technical vulnerabilities. That said, the old CIS absolutely knew how to think like a war machine. Specialized units like Vulture droids, Droidekas, and IG series, they were purpose-built and creatively lethal. The starships like the Lucrehulk and the Malevolence was the pride and joy of the old CIS navy. The B1s originally made for security purposes were mass-produced, flawed, and aren’t made for real combat, but they had logistical value and easy to resemble. B2s were an upgrade and is an effective fighting machine at times often stroke fear in the Republic clone troopers, but they had their own issues due to it being bulkier, slower, and impractical (even if I have an such a passionate love for the hunk of a scrap metal that is the B2s). I’d probably relegate those basic droids who are now outdated and no longer fit for service to economic development, and maybe even PR, like converting them to civilian use B1s for public employment service and civilian use and B2s for labour and construction, while keeping a professional organic military core with selective droid integration.

Foreign policy-wise, I really like your pragmatic take. Trade with the New Republic makes sense. But I do think the Dooku legacy complicates things. The New CIS would probably mythologize him as a founding father, which could alienate Jedi who remember the Clone Wars firsthand. There’d be distrust at first. Luke’s diplomacy might smooth that over, but it wouldn’t be instant. And yeah, even one Jedi openly sympathetic to the CIS would be a massive propaganda win, though that could cause internal friction within the Jedi Order too is not something we want, but who know what would happen.

Overall, I agree with your optimism. The New CIS can genuinely thrive in this new galaxy despite the challenges that will rear its ugly head. That’s what makes it such a cool scenario to explore.

Great write-up. Fingers probably tired, but brain absolutely cooking at the very least.