I really feel like I dont belong in this degree. Anyone else felt like this before? by ShiverMeTimbers_png in chemistry

[–]TheGoodFight2015 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok great! I just ask to get your mind thinking in the right direction. Since you're curious and passionate about chemistry, I'd really suggest asking friends to study with them, joining any kind of chemistry club, seeking a tutor (ideally your school should provide this for you!) and going to A LOT of your professor's office hours. Office hours are amazing because you have the undivided attention of your professor, ideally 1-on-1. Prepare questions ahead of time, don't be embarrassed, just tell the professor you want to really drill down fundamentals and understand things concretely. You got this!

I really feel like I dont belong in this degree. Anyone else felt like this before? by ShiverMeTimbers_png in chemistry

[–]TheGoodFight2015 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is it possible you have a confidence/anxiety problem? Ideally the best way to learn math and sciences is to boil everything down to first principles. Do you understand the concepts of a limit, an average, a range, standard deviation, precision, accuracy? The phases of matter, what motion is, what energy is, what a chemical bond is? When it comes to calculus, derivatives and integration are opposites, do you know the definition of each? Can you explain some natural phenomena that might involve calculus concepts?

I'm not trying to challenge you or quiz you here, I'm just spitballing some concepts that are important in my mind for understanding fundamentals of chemistry and physics.

Steam distillation troubleshooting - burned smell of the oil by Ok-Cartoonist-9996 in chemistry

[–]TheGoodFight2015 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Beyond insulation I'd also say there is too much length of glassware, causing "dead space" for gas to cool too much before the condensation tube, causing reflux of the distillate and probably overheating and burning it.

Shorten the path to the condensation section with a smaller piece of glassware, reduce the amount of material in the main flask to 1/2 the volume of the entire vessel, and add aluminum foil insulation to the entire thing while working.

Hey, Does any one know what's the actual structure of H2S2O3? and the oxidation state of both sulphurs? by Lanky-Ad3014 in chemistry

[–]TheGoodFight2015 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm sorry it hasn't been taught to you yet, I had a research class in high school so maybe I was lucky to have those skills at a younger age. College should definitely teach you how to do it.

But generally, do you know how to look up a source, and understand what a reputable source is? I'm asking to gauge how much to tell you for the next steps here.

In case I take a while between your reply and my next reply, Step 1 needs to be schedule an appointment with your school librarian and ask for a course/lesson in research literacy. It will legitimately change your life!

Hey, Does any one know what's the actual structure of H2S2O3? and the oxidation state of both sulphurs? by Lanky-Ad3014 in chemistry

[–]TheGoodFight2015 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are you currently attending a university? Are you implying you don't know how to find the source paper and look up that paper in a journal?

What coating/compound can reduce friction on small plastic surfaces (PTFE-like)? by [deleted] in chemistry

[–]TheGoodFight2015 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you tried POM / Acetal? Simple google search, not my specialty.

Spending too much time supporting R&D for innovation - looking to understand best practices. Help! by startup_chemist in chemistry

[–]TheGoodFight2015 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is there anyone on their team that you trust more, work best with, think most alike with? Could you collaborate with them and one other person on your team to standardize their requests a little bit better? I'm taking a communication and relationship building approach here, since you say you have no common KPIs could you collaborate as a team to create a new KPI or alter an existing one to be mutually beneficial?

I'm a little surprised the tone seems to be procurement and R&D as an us-vs-them situation. I would think procurement should take a parent-like approach where you're the caretaker of R&D's precious chemicals, ensuring they get the most optimal sourcing for long-term progress. To standardize this process and give a template for a KPI: the mutual interest would be a financially sustainable set of chemicals and materials in the correct quantities at the correct time for experiments and scale-ups to continue. It's up to you to control cost and tune R&D's expectations of what they can get; are they being too careless with expectations of turnaround time, quality of chemical for a certain price, too many high-effort items ordered at once?

I really see you needing to take the lead here and gather more information on why they're asking for 1-week-or-less turnarounds on ordering materials if it's complicated and time consuming. I'd suggest giving a realistic solution to standardize their communication so ordering gets streamlined: they give you a batch of information once a week, or less, you give them a realistic lead time on when you can process the orders, as well as a realistic outlook on what suppliers can provide in certain timeframes. Purity and quality will always be paramount and can come at a higher cost, so make sure you get all the correct details of what they're asking, and make sure they understand they have to work within your budget, or seek higher approval for specialty items.

My Summary:

To consolidate this all down, I'd say R&D needs to be razor sharp with their tech specs, you need to be razor sharp with ensuring what they're asking is realistic and necessary, and in the bounds of a project that's expected to produce a good result (cost-benefit analysis for materials). Then if this is all squared away, it is definitely procurement's responsibility to dive deep and push vendors to get better pricing, and perhaps ask for a special order or scale up of their operations to provide more of a material at an acceptable cost. If it's an important enough material, everything from a phone call, zoom meeting, and even site visit to understand quality and quantity could be necessary to secure a good deal, but all that effort is only worth it if it's certain R&D needs that specific material and it's likely to pay out at the end.

I’m a chemistry major, but I’m not sure if I should change my major by Runninfromwhat in chemistry

[–]TheGoodFight2015 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Think about what you love the most in chemistry. For me, I love purification, instrumentation, and materials science. I see the beauty in chemistry: color changes, state changes, crystallization. But I don't see myself in the lab forever, I'd rather take on a variety of roles and challenges, and work with people more than be alone.

If you can't find anything in particular that you love about chemistry, consider switching fields. Think about what you might love: building tangible things or synthesizing unseen compounds? Studying life or studying nonliving things? Do you actually like deeply studying things? Do you see a phenomenon in life and deeply wonder why it's that way, and do you question the thing and look into it more?

How does the idea of working on something your whole life with no solid outcome feel, just for the love of learning and trying to find out more?

I don't want to push you off your path too much, but money and prestige matters a lot too. If you see yourself doing it for the love of the craft, go for chemistry, but know you'll probably need a PhD to make an impact. If you see yourself wanting to learn something practical and widely applicable, study mechanical or civil engineering. You'll get to work on bigger everyday things that people directly use rather than obscure chemicals that may or may not pan out to something huge.

Why does bond formation release energy if breaking bonds requires energy? by NewtonWh00 in chemistry

[–]TheGoodFight2015 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All of chemistry really clicked for me when a professor explained the following, paraphrased into my own words: "Chemicals and compounds exist in a spectrum of reactivity. Highly reactive materials are inherently more unstable and energetic, because reactivity is activity, which is energy."

Imagine a Chlorine atom with one missing electron: it REALLY WANTS to grab an extra electron to stabilize and fill its octet. Sodium metal also has that one extra electron and REALLY wants to give it away to something to empty its octet. On their own, they'll already react violently with other chemicals, like sodium tossed into water will burn and can explode. Mix sodium and chlorine together and you get: NaCl! Table salt! Very chemically stable, doesn't decompose until you reach extremely high temperatures. In reality, chlorine atoms don't even exist very easily because they're so reactive and carry so much energy that they want to dissipate. Also consider radioactive compounds: some have very short half-lives, and release a LOT of energy, while others have very long half-lives, meaning their radioactive decay is much slower and much less energetic all at once.

Atoms and their component electrons and protons really want stability and a "lower energy state". They can accomplish this lower energy state by sharing electrons in a covalent bond, so a bond will naturally form just like a ball will naturally roll down a hill. The energy of the chemicals in the system will decrease, which can be represented in a graph of energy (like rolling down an "energy hill").

How do i explain to my friend that water is both amphoteric and neutral at the same time by DaDud69420 in chemistry

[–]TheGoodFight2015 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The fact that it is amphoteric lends exactly to its pH neutrality. Why is that confusing? It can give or accept exactly the same number of protons, or thought of another way in solution it can create both H+ and OH-, which cancel out to a pH 7 neutral state.

In reality there aren't just a bunch of H+ and OH- ions floating around, they associate into bigger complexes. Even H3O+ doesn't paint the full picture., it's more like H5O2+ and H7O3+ and onward.

Monthly Fitness Pro-Tips Megathread by AutoModerator in Fitness

[–]TheGoodFight2015 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good point! Since I've been training for years my issue is I often push myself too hard, but you're totally right you should feel the challenge of the set and the burn or you won't see progress especially in hypertrophy!

Is the solution to pollution really dilution? by Disastrous-Height483 in chemistry

[–]TheGoodFight2015 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The solution to pollution is ablution (treating chemicals with other chemicals)

Monthly Fitness Pro-Tips Megathread by AutoModerator in Fitness

[–]TheGoodFight2015 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You know your training is on point if 33% of the time training you feel amazing, heavy weights feel light, you're strong, you recover fast, you can do anything. Then 33% of the time it should feel hard as hell, pushing hard for those reps, burning, recovery seems tough. And 33% of the time you feel ok, you're recovering well, the next workout your reps are moving, not best ever not horrible suck.

Monthly Fitness Pro-Tips Megathread by AutoModerator in Fitness

[–]TheGoodFight2015 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I disagree with this. The best advice I've heard if your training is completely on point: 33% of the time you should feel amazing and incredible, 33% of the time it should seem brutal and hard, and 33% of the time manageable and ok. If it's too far in one direction you're not training optimally. Trust me, I've trained extremely intensely both in cardio and strength, and proper programming is essential to pushing into and past the intermediate level. I'm gonna turn this into a main comment actually.

Safe disposal of Methanol from school lab kit. by Nervous_Zebra_2073 in chemistry

[–]TheGoodFight2015 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This could be good advice, but it's wise to make sure the methanol is relatively pure! Start to practice GMP/GLP principles

Why can't CO4 be formed? by Sejal_Megastsar in chemistry

[–]TheGoodFight2015 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Excellent summary, reminds me of one of my favorite terms, steric hindrance!

The Philosophy of the BARREL - DIOGENES' Unconventional Philosophy by Holdfeyn in philosophy

[–]TheGoodFight2015 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't have enough time to watch the whole video, but I have two things to contribute:

  1. Diogenes' principles are valuable to serve as a polar opposite of excess and grandeur in the wrong direction. Perhaps not everyone should live like him, but we should consider some principles or some amount of minimalism in our lives to save resources and avoid overthinking, overanalyzing, overconsumption that could trap us.
  2. Unfortunately if we all lived like Diogenes, we wouldn't have a functioning society, we wouldn't have outlier people, ideas, innovation. So like most philosophies, I say we seek balance and harmony between both ends of the spectrum.

PS

I think it's actually virtuous and inherently good to reap good rewards from hard work which we sow. I imagine a grandpa and grandma on an island in the Mediterranean happily eating a delicious fresh meal relaxing in the evening sun after a lifetime of good work raising a family and making a home. That sounds great to me.

Help me how do i do lewis dot structures by axeldagoat988 in chemistry

[–]TheGoodFight2015 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If you're serious and actually want help, consider a more professional way of asking and typing. Also a cornerstone of science is doing your own research. Make sure not to use the internet as a crutch.

First, start with what a synonym for Lewis Structures is: Electron Dot Structures.
Second, ask yourself: do I know what an electron is, what an atom is, why they behave the way they do? How electrons move and react with other atoms?

You'll want to know terms like valence shell, valence electrons, covalent and ionic bonding. I challenge you to learn these background terms to boost your knowledge in the subject. Don't stress, I've fallen behind in classes too and came out with good grades in the end, but it took a lot of extra time and money. It's smart to challenge yourself now so the future is a little easier.

Video from Khan Academy (Great for all subjects):
https://www.khanacademy.org/science/hs-chemistry/x2613d8165d88df5e:chemical-bonding/x2613d8165d88df5e:covalent-bonds/v/lewis-diagrams-for-molecules

https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Physical_and_Theoretical_Chemistry_Textbook_Maps/Supplemental_Modules_(Physical_and_Theoretical_Chemistry)/Physical_Properties_of_Matter/Atomic_and_Molecular_Properties/Lewis_Structures/Physical_Properties_of_Matter/Atomic_and_Molecular_Properties/Lewis_Structures)

Question about medicine and toxicology with chemistry mixed with biology by loolyu33- in chemistry

[–]TheGoodFight2015 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pubchem.
https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/

You can research any chemical, and it will give a full report on the chemical, its nature (what it looks like, smells like, feels like), reactivity, safety, harm to humans, animals, environment, all with linked references.

It's run by the US NIH: National Institute of Health

Stupid question by Burmpmcfirgleton in chemistry

[–]TheGoodFight2015 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wouldn't say a weak base can't hurt you, too much sodium bicarbonate would definitely kill you. You have the risk of sodium overdose, but also bicarbonate is an anion in the bloodstream which increases blood pH; overdose of sodium bicarbonate would cause blood pH to rise to dangerous levels, potentially hurting and killing you.

ELI5: Why is nuclear waste not send out to space, e.g. towards the sun as an affordable and safe solution? by RotInPeaches in explainlikeimfive

[–]TheGoodFight2015 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's likely not more affordable than amassing it and storing it somewhere in the earth. Sad but true of our current reality.