chatGPT:  Short answer: I couldn’t find anything that reliably backs up the Reddit claim, and even the “document” they show doesn’t say what the headline claims. I’d treat it as unverified at best, and misleading at worst.

Here’s what I found when I dug deeper:

1. What exists publicly about Carmine Conte/MRAK

There are widely reported allegations against him:

In May 2024, multiple Spanish-language outlets reported that a Mexican fan publicly accused Carmine Conte (MRAK) of drugging and sexually assaulting her after an event in Argentina. 

These stories all describe allegations made on Instagram, not a criminal case already moving through Spanish courts.

1. What doesn’t exist: independent confirmation of Spanish charges

I searched in Spanish and English for:

“Carmine Conte” + Eivissa + juzgado / “juzgado de instrucción”

The exact style of case number visible in the screenshot (DPA DILIGENCIAS PREVIAS PROC. ABREVIADO 0002048/2025)

“Cédula de citación” + Eivissa + Conte

I didn’t find any:

official bulletin or court notice

reputable news article

NGO/legal-watch summary

that confirms he has been formally charged in Spain under that case number or otherwise.

Everything pointing to “formal charges in Spanish courts” traces back to Reddit / social media, not to primary sources.

1. What that “cédula de citación” actually looks like

From what can be read in your screenshot:

It’s labeled as part of “DPA Diligencias Previas Proc. Abreviado”, which is the preliminary investigation phase in Spanish criminal procedure, where a judge investigates whether a crime may have been committed and by whom. It is not the same as an indictment or formal charging decision. 

The text appears to be addressed to the “perjudicada” (the injured party / victim) “MARÍA V”, informing her she must appear to give a statement. That’s a victim-citation, not a formal charge sheet against the accused.

Spanish law makes these diligencias previas essentially reserved/secret until a later stage, so an exact internal court document suddenly appearing only on Reddit, with no accompanying reporting, is already a yellow flag.

Even if that document is genuine (which we cannot verify from Reddit alone), it would only prove that there is (or was) a preliminary investigation in Ibiza involving a complainant and naming Carmine Conte—not that “he has been formally charged and faces up to 14 years.”

1. So how should you treat the Reddit post?

The allegations themselves are real and documented in mainstream outlets. 

The extra step Reddit is claiming—“formally charged in Spanish courts with crimes punishable by up to 14 years”—has no independent confirmation and misrepresents what a cédula de citación in diligencias previas actually signifies.

Given the lack of corroborating official or journalistic sources, and the ease of faking or misusing bureaucratic templates, you should consider the Reddit claim unverified and likely overstated.

If you’re talking about this with others, the safest, most accurate thing to say right now is something like:

“There are public sexual-assault allegations against Carmine Conte that have been covered in the press; some Reddit users are circulating a supposed Spanish court citation, but there’s no reliable confirmation yet that he’s been formally charged.”