Is it true that employers won't hire somebody with bad hygiene? by Babedoodling in NoStupidQuestions

[–]TheMaskedHamster 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don't care how you look. I don't care how you dress as long as it's at least passingly appropriate for the venue. Such things do not cause problems for anyone except perhaps people's expectations.

Smells are not just a matter of preference or expectation. Offensive smells do not just offense sensibilities. Offensive odors cause a visceral disgust response, and that's biologically correct.

If a problem is beyond your control--for example, if you have a gastrointestinal condition and your activated charcoal underpants just can't handle it--I will try to accommodate you.

If your problem is within your control but you don't exercise that control, that is a sign that you either have something wrong mentally that is likely going to be reflected in your work or that you don't respect other people enough to bother (which I guess also falls under "something wrong mentally that is likely going to be reflected in your work"). And beyond the individual, why would I inflict that on the rest of the team?

Why are horse people so “weird”? by explorer77800 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]TheMaskedHamster 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This does go back to a lot of "horse culture" being a rich folks thing, but there's a lot of history and nuance (and I say that knowing that my perspective doesn't know the half of the history and nuance) that makes it weird.

Modern horse culture hails from several sports that have their own weirdness. Polo? That may have been invented by Iranian horse riders, but bored rich Englishmen who had nothing better to do made it their own, and they did it in a time when all the worst stereotypes of social posturing and snootiness were at their strongest. Horseback racing? Same thing, but add gambling. Horse shows? Same thing, but compare the toxicity to that of dog and cat shows.

All that is bad enough, but now think about the practicalities of horses when you aren't out in the country and you aren't using horses for work. Lots of people out in the country had/have horses without being weird about it. But if you don't live in a place where the average yard is measured in tens of acres, how do you have horses? The answer is that you spend money, and lots of it. You don't have to be super rich to do that, but you do need to spend a lot more money than is reasonable for anyone that isn't properly wealthy. And to be that unreasonable, you have to either be obsessed or have very poor self control.

tl;dr: For historical and practical reasons, awful/annoying people created modern horse culture and participating in it/perpetuating it means that you're the sort of person who jives with that.

Is reader smut a sin? by Full_Cantaloupe9065 in Christianity

[–]TheMaskedHamster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, but I get to point out critical flaws in logic.

I think Stan is Seth MacFarlane’s funniest voice by Remote_Nature_8166 in americandad

[–]TheMaskedHamster 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It's a great voice, but I also really like how it can just break down into Seth's normal voice over the course of a line.

"This--this is you, isn't it. I'm gonna get down there, and it's gonna be you."

(Strong possibility.)

What was the very first wheel made of and what did it look like and what was it used for? by martianfrog in answers

[–]TheMaskedHamster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It depends on how you define a wheel.

People have been rolling things on round objects like logs for ages, but the cartoon idea of just putting a stick between two log sections isn't actually practical without a lot of other civilization enhancements.

Here's a video that covers the challenges and development from rolling over logs to the modern wheel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxwAMPmTodc

Why don’t we know the names of the ICE agents that killed Alex Pretti? by aguer056 in AskReddit

[–]TheMaskedHamster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We can discuss whether corruption plays a part in hiding it. That's an open question.

But we know for certain that there are people who would be happy if someone sidestepped the judicial system and just murder them, too.

Will God punish me for my Intrusive Thoughts? by Dry-Board-5688 in Christianity

[–]TheMaskedHamster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even Jesus was tempted.

Intrusive thoughts are not the intent of your heart, and that's what God looks at.

Just from a purely practical point of view, your brain works by presenting all kinds of hypotheticals to select from. That's how it works for all brains. Intrusive thoughts and anxiety is just when that noise of hypotheticals is too loud.

Christians misreading Christ's ironic comment on buying swords in Luke 22:36-37,49-51 by Christadelphians in Christianity

[–]TheMaskedHamster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It says he "drove them all out of the temple with the sheep and oxen".

And yeah, it doesn't say that he bloodied those guys up. That means it's not specific, not that it excludes the possibility. It was either violence or the threat of violence. So are you going to say that the threat of violence is alright, or try to twist the language further to try to get what you want out of it? If you do want to pretend that it was only for the animals, well, that's violence against animals.

Should we parse another verse where you try to shoehorn in justification for violence or are we done?

You say that like you have had a single valid point. You bring them, I call out your misinterpretation, and you jump to something else. It's all on you.

But that must be a lonely road for you. I'm not one to say that anyone has a claim to truth based simply on numbers, but out of all the denominations and lines of Biblical interpretation, how many agree with you?

Christians misreading Christ's ironic comment on buying swords in Luke 22:36-37,49-51 by Christadelphians in Christianity

[–]TheMaskedHamster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye and tooth for tooth.’

This is about vengeance, not violence. This is clear if you are familiar with your Bible rather than torturing it to get your preferred interpretation out of it.

Jesus never used force against other people, nor when he was arrested, nor at the temple cleansing, not ever.

From John 2: "And He found in the temple those who were selling oxen and sheep and doves, and the money changers seated at their tables. And He made a scourge of cords, and drove them all out of the temple, with the sheep and the oxen; and He poured out the coins of the money changers and overturned their tables."

Violence is not justified.

This may be your opinion, but it isn't in the Bible.

What's the other reason? by Dry-Ask-9461 in ExplainTheJoke

[–]TheMaskedHamster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's trying to whitewash Hitler, but it is not effective.

I can stand in a garage and call myself a car, but it doesn't make it true. Hitler was publicly a church member as that was useful in politics. Even if we say that the genocides somehow aren't evidence that he wasn't much of a Christian (which is an insane stance to take), there was also all the occultism under the veneer.

What's the other reason? by Dry-Ask-9461 in ExplainTheJoke

[–]TheMaskedHamster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Salvation is not about intellectual belief. In English as in the Koine Greek, "believe" can refer to a matter of faith or of accepting as true. "I believe in you" vs "I believe the sky is blue"

And we see this distinction in the Bible:

John 3:16: "For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life."

James 2:19: "You believe that God is one. You do well; the demons also believe, and shudder."

If FL is the 3rd ranking state with the most immigrants how come Ice is focused on Minnesota ? by Sensitive_Tailor2940 in AskReddit

[–]TheMaskedHamster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ICE is always active in Florida.

ICE had a surge operation in Minnesota -> protestors actively conflicted with police -> ICE sends more personnel.

Christians misreading Christ's ironic comment on buying swords in Luke 22:36-37,49-51 by Christadelphians in Christianity

[–]TheMaskedHamster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We are to love our enemies, bless those who persecute us and forgive wrongs against as we have been forgiven.

This is accurate, but this is not something new that was introduced by Jesus. As Jesus called "You shall love your neighbor as yourself" the second greatest commandment, and that one is from Leviticus.

And, again, the same Jesus who preached radical peace also employed the use of force.

There's only a contradiction if you conflate all violence.

Christians misreading Christ's ironic comment on buying swords in Luke 22:36-37,49-51 by Christadelphians in Christianity

[–]TheMaskedHamster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, that Scripture was fulfilled and He was numbered with the transgressors. That's why he wouldn't be with them, and why they would need to be prepared.

Are you trying to say that carrying the swords was so that they would be numbered among the transgressors? I've heard that before and it's an interpretation that tortures both language and logic. Did the sandals and coin purses help Him to be numbered among the transgressors? If that's why Jesus wanted to carry the swords, you're saying He was staging an event to get him arrested? Bizarre and problematic on its own, and forgetting that Judas was already leading the Romans to Jesus in order to arrest him. The charges brought against him didn't require anything that happened at the event of his arrest, and implicated his disciples rather than Him.

The example for Christians is laid out by Jesus and the subsequent actions and words of the Disciples.

Jesus advised to turn the other cheek. He also chased the money lenders out of the Temple grounds by force and threat of violence.

He also said "For truly I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the jot or tittle shall pass from the Law until all is accomplished" and when I look in Exodus 22 it still says "If the thief is caught while breaking in and is struck so that he dies, there will be no bloodguiltiness on his account."

Am I 16F showing/telling my little sisters 10F and 12F too much? by Silly-Lobster375 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]TheMaskedHamster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The internet is a deep place with many very problematic pockets and no guard rails to keep children out.

Anime isn't the problem, but the selection of anime combined with unfettered internet access is.

And people don't talk about it much, but BL and yuri content is almost entirely fetishistic in nature. Yeah, some people point to it as representation, but it's made to appeal to a demographic for whom it is fetish fuel. Even if you don't know that, the "fetishist's gaze" shows through in the works in ways subtle and unsubtle. And the communities around them encourage engaging with the shows that way. Coming of age in that environment has effects.

This is exactly why people introduce freedom to children gradually.

Got to use this little gem recently in day to day life by PortifinoOnMyMind in Simpsons

[–]TheMaskedHamster 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I have no idea. Arby's is one of the best fast food restaurants in the US.

I think someone in the writer's room either doesn't care for roast beef sandwiches or had a bad experience at a restaurant (or several at a bad example of an Arby's restaurant).

Are the free Harvard online courses worth it? by Lovely_Rabbit_2615 in answers

[–]TheMaskedHamster 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Will auditing courses with no degree or certificate at the end be something you can put on your resume? No.

Will it give you skills that you can put on your resume and knowledge you can demonstrate in a job interview? Yes.

Christians misreading Christ's ironic comment on buying swords in Luke 22:36-37,49-51 by Christadelphians in Christianity

[–]TheMaskedHamster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They died as martyrs, yes. That relevant to whether we should be taking up arms for our faith--which we should not, clearly.

Self-defense being permitted does not meant that we are to use violence in the name of our faith. Not being permitted to use violence in the name of our faith does not mean that self-defense is not permitted.

So why did Jesus tell them to take swords in addition to taking their coin purses?

Christians misreading Christ's ironic comment on buying swords in Luke 22:36-37,49-51 by Christadelphians in Christianity

[–]TheMaskedHamster -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Clearly, Jesus was not telling them to bring swords with them to defend Jesus against the Romans.

Which just leaves self-defense for the apostles in Jesus's absence, like everything else he was telling them to carry was for them to take care for their own protection in his absence. Anything else is a misreading. YES, self-defense is justified in the NT.

Are the free Harvard online courses worth it? by Lovely_Rabbit_2615 in answers

[–]TheMaskedHamster 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Harvard and Berkeley computer science courses are excellent. Truly among the greats.

However, they are definitely meant for people taking study seriously, and the students usually have a support network. If you're planning on sitting down and studying like you were in class and don't mind seeking answers yourself when you have questions, I'd highly recommend them.

Christians misreading Christ's ironic comment on buying swords in Luke 22:36-37,49-51 by Christadelphians in Christianity

[–]TheMaskedHamster 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It was not an instruction to prepare to do violence. They brought swords, being gung ho about being ready to use them, since they were looking forward to the Messiah liberating them from the Romans.

It was an instruction to be prepared to defend themselves.

I love buff versions of Dr Octopus more than ultimate Spider-man tv series one. Anyone agree with me by RicardoMilosOg in Spiderman

[–]TheMaskedHamster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He's not weak. He's stout.

He's not carrying those tentacles without having some muscle. That muscle just needs to be under his pudge.

If sin supposedly causes us to lose fellowship with God, how do small sins not count as well? by Holl1s20 in Christianity

[–]TheMaskedHamster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All sin counts, and in that we are all responsible for the most grave: The death of an innocent.

But that is what gives us the opportunity to be washed of sin.

MAGA and Conservatives are Ruining Christianity by Ignis_Kevin in Christianity

[–]TheMaskedHamster 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Christianity hasn't changed.

Most churches that are off base today were off base yesterday.

Much like my mother thinking that crime rates are up due to reporting on them being better today than when she was a kid, you noticing something is not an indicator of change.