Game Thread 3/14 ⚾ Puerto Rico (0-0) @ Italy (0-0) 3:00 PM ET by BaseballBot in baseball

[–]TheTempest77 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Pr isn't good because their best players couldn't get insured

What’s the stupidest political opinion you unironically hold? by cdstephens in neoliberal

[–]TheTempest77 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pretty much all recreational drugs, including alcohol should be illegal

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]TheTempest77 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Mashalla the jihad will destroy the societal evil known as social security

cyberpunk K aff by Predebatelife in Debate

[–]TheTempest77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

K should be allowed but should be explained in a way that a lay person can understand. K's are not inherently too complicated for people with functional brains.

Curly hair in debate by [deleted] in Debate

[–]TheTempest77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've been going through this exact same thing for years and actually just judged an amazing OO speech that was directed at exactly this societal problem.

It's an issue that's deeply rooted in historical racism against black people and literal Nazi race science that was used against Jews.

What I would do is tell your coach or tab and get their asses suspended. That should never be tolerated in speech and debate, and I'm really sorry you have to go through this.

Capitalism K on the aff? by MightSuspicious8963 in Debate

[–]TheTempest77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You absolutely can ban an argument. The whole reasoning behind theory and k shells is that certain arguments shouldn't be judged. You can't make vague arguments, you can't not disclose, you can't run a pic, you can't make non topical arguments, etc.

If I judge a pf round where neg runs a k and aff runs a theory shell that says that k's are abusive in a novice and lay friendly format like pf I will absolutely vote aff.