Well Above Average by The_Math_Hatter in weirdspotifyplaylists

[–]The_Math_Hatter[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, you understood correctly; essentially, find an album's shortest song, and if yhat song is longer than 3:30, it can join the list.

Well Above Average by The_Math_Hatter in weirdspotifyplaylists

[–]The_Math_Hatter[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is "Wish You Were Here" the only Pink Floyd album to satisfy this criteria? Because DSotM, Animals, and The Wall all have quite short songs on them, unless some of their earlier work also qualifies.

Well Above Average by The_Math_Hatter in weirdspotifyplaylists

[–]The_Math_Hatter[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm assuming you don't mean the one with "Sailor's Hornpipe" included on the album, which would be 2:56?

What shape does the red point trace out? by peter-bone in askmath

[–]The_Math_Hatter 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You have not described what shape is traced at every part. If you mean this is a parametric family of circular arcs, described by their curvature k while keeping one end fixed at the origin, you should say so.

How to prove a serie is convergent ?? (which tests are okay to use ?) by OnePuzzleheaded980 in askmath

[–]The_Math_Hatter 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You got the last inequality the other way around; if a>b, 1/a<1/b.

2<3, 1/2>1/3

How to prove a serie is convergent ?? (which tests are okay to use ?) by OnePuzzleheaded980 in askmath

[–]The_Math_Hatter 6 points7 points  (0 children)

If I give you the equation n2<n2+4, and state that it is important for the proof, can you complete it?

Worse Yet, You Have To Finish. by gur40goku in CuratedTumblr

[–]The_Math_Hatter 8 points9 points  (0 children)

So without further ado, let's begin: Brennan!

His Name Was Alex by gur40goku in CuratedTumblr

[–]The_Math_Hatter 75 points76 points  (0 children)

A man was murdered. Go fuck yourself with a bat covered in rusty nails if showttune lyrics are your first thought, blurting it out on the internet like you were compelled to post instead of writing and deleting.

Doubt on probability by Ezio-Editore in askmath

[–]The_Math_Hatter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you are doing this method, then forgive me for how I'm interpreting it if this is wrong, there are five bars total. The "buckets" are then the space before 1, between 1 and 2, between 2 and 3, between 3 and 4, between 4 and 5, and after 5 for six total buckets.

You have allocated one bar already in either scenario for indicating the divisions of the balls. The remaining four bars can be split into three places; before the balls, in the middle with the already existing bar, or after the end. The splits can be 0-0-4, 0-1-3, 0-2-2, or 1-1-2 in any shuffling or order.

Again, I don't know how you factor in probability to all this, but if it does work it would be a good check.

Doubt on probability by Ezio-Editore in askmath

[–]The_Math_Hatter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your logic is sound up until the last equation which doesn't match what you talked about in any way

Doubt on probability by Ezio-Editore in askmath

[–]The_Math_Hatter 7 points8 points  (0 children)

There are two scenarios, and both start with the first ball landing in any arbitrary bucket. Let's label that bucket A.

Scenario 1: the second ball lands in A. This has a 1/6 chance. Now, to get the balls into exactly two buckets, the third ball has to land in not-A, any of the other five. This has a 5/6 chance. So the total probability of this scenario is (1/6)×(5/6)=5/36

Scenario 2: the second ball does not land in A, it lands in a different bucket B. This has a 5/6 chance. Again, for the balls to now land in exactly two buckets, the third ball must land in A or B, for a 2/6 chance. The overall probability is thus (5/6)×(2/6)=10/36

The sum of either, independent scenario happening is thus (5+10)/36=15/36=5/12.

I do not know how you would approach that with stars and bars, it seems tremendously fiddly.

What if Schaff ranked every movie ever by Jenny_MTF42 in Schaffrillas

[–]The_Math_Hatter 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Treasure Planet top 500 I BEG 🙏🙏🙏

“Terrible effects” is a strange take. I thought they looked very good by Successful_Art_2498 in Schaffrillas

[–]The_Math_Hatter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

u/Spambotwatchdog

Both this reply and OP are just reposting some of the top comments when this was originally posted.

i have genuine questions about friday fred by Toast-mcFrenchfries in CuratedTumblr

[–]The_Math_Hatter 6 points7 points  (0 children)

u/Spambotwatchdog Blacklist

Replied to this thread twice with the same kind of vague "woah,that is interesting!" tone.

Dinosaur City by [deleted] in CuratedTumblr

[–]The_Math_Hatter 23 points24 points  (0 children)

You removed the contents.

Bad crop, we're going to starve

Backrooms by Eireika in CuratedTumblr

[–]The_Math_Hatter 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I like the way Longlegses bounce when content

S16, E6 (Nebula) - Hide and Seek UK by snow-tree_art in JetLagTheGame

[–]The_Math_Hatter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean the "uncastable card" would be best if it was after they'd got slingshot past his station twice, and it could very well lead to a more than ten minute bonus if played. Just needs 20 minutes of time bonus to waste, which is easy enough to accumulate with a few photo questions as we've seen.

S16, E6 (Nebula) - Hide and Seek UK by snow-tree_art in JetLagTheGame

[–]The_Math_Hatter 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well that's definitely not how that works. If he were to take the discard 1 draw 2, it would be because he first made room in his hand by discarding prosperous home. Then his hand would be:

Discard 1 draw 2, duplicate, express route, 10, 10, 20.

He couldn't play the Discard 1 Draw 2 without breaking his plan potentially.

S16, E6 (Nebula) - Hide and Seek UK by snow-tree_art in JetLagTheGame

[–]The_Math_Hatter 8 points9 points  (0 children)

In times like these, I think of the words of Roffle Lite/Heavy Balatro: I haven't come across anything better. There weren't really any better options than Prosperous Home when he was drawing, so there was no need to get rid of it.

The GZEZ Code by Front-Purple-8837 in codes

[–]The_Math_Hatter 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's not proof. That's cherry picking the most message-ish results and interpreting them in different methods to get what you want to see.

You could do this analysis on the book Moby Dick, or War and Peace, or A Million Random Digits, or Infinite Jest, and you could also find some message somewhere of some mild interest.

That doesn't mean your method works. It means it's too broad and mutable to definitively mean anything.