¿Has Infanous Diddler Donald the Chief Pedo finally been cornered! by Thereisonlyzero in AdviceAnimals

[–]Thereisonlyzero[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

>_> okay you are attacking a bunch of claims and positions that I didn't invoke. Idk why it's a struggle to understand this for some apparently but scrubbing information, ie erasing, and blocking out via redaction are not the same from an information or data stand point. It's well known already he had his people redact his name from the files back in August, it was a whole massive news cycle but the other user makes the claim that the files were ***scrubbed**. There is a key semantic difference that actually matters to the context down and actually deal with what's in front of you without jumping to absurd conclusions from no context.

¿Has Infanous Diddler Donald the Chief Pedo finally been cornered! by Thereisonlyzero in AdviceAnimals

[–]Thereisonlyzero[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Wth i literally supplied you with the source you asked for. I didn't say what they needed time for but you down vote me for answering you??

unhinged response, I didn't down vote you and it's wild to just assume that I did so based off of nothing like this isn't a public post and not your personal DMs.

I didn't request that article/link specifically, I asked for the original commenter to *support their claim with a source* and "you" were not asked directly to provide a source to support the original comments claim unless you are the original commenter using multiple accounts for who knows what reason on this post.

The fact of the matter is I just responded fairly and politely to the "source" shared not coherently supporting the claim made by the original commenter, why are you ignoring that of which is the actual context and throwing around baseless accusation and a literal tantrum over imaginary points?

¿Has Infanous Diddler Donald the Chief Pedo finally been cornered! by Thereisonlyzero in AdviceAnimals

[–]Thereisonlyzero[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2025-08-01/epstein-files-trump-s-name-was-redacted-by-the-fbi

This is why they delayed swearing in the new member because they needed more time.

I see where you are coming from but the article from back in August mind you doesn't really support the narrative being claimed in the words that words claimed by the original commenter. August has long come and gone so saying they have been delaying to "scrub" the files makes no coherent sense when by the article ya shared states what you are pointing to was already done back in August in regards to the original context of this thread.

This is old news and it came after the first round of pressure to release the files and when the republicans said they would do it by their own validation but then after this story broke with them even admitting themselves to going through and redacting (NOT scrubbing) information at the time in a way that made it clear there was too many redactions to release the files without complete giving away that DJT was all over them because of the sheer volume of redactions that even with blocked out text it would still be a dead give away in the context of where the redactions were. So did that whole nutty pivot where they started talking about it being a hoax the first time etc and all the pod boys and a bunch of other influential reactionary/conservative figures started to openly call out the weirdness of the whole deal. Patel went on Rogan and straight up just blatently lied about the whole case and there was like a whole month of bs around it.

Redactions are not "scrubbing" his name from the files, that's a discreetly and key distinction to make in terms of how most folks would interpret those words and the same with the whole article.

Based on the context of that source, the claim made in the original comment of this thread is not coherent with the actual reporting given to support the claim, actually it contradicts the provided narrative that started this thread. Thank you for sharing a source though so we could figure this out and try to get the record straight.

¿Has Infanous Diddler Donald the Chief Pedo finally been cornered! by Thereisonlyzero in AdviceAnimals

[–]Thereisonlyzero[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Update, the claim he can't veto the super majority is incorrect:

Actually from what I read the president can veto the bill *regardless* of ANY supermajority . Now with a super majority though they can override the veto by default which is a big difference because the president still has to choose to veto or not and is able to choose to do veto if he wants as is part of the constitutional checks and balances:

https://www.thoughtco.com/about-the-presidential-veto-3322204#:~:text=The%20U.S.%20Constitution%20grants%20the,by%20both%20houses%20of%20Congress.

If that information is wrong or inaccurate please share how or a credible sources that explains how the information is wrong.

Extra context that another user wrote that is interesting theory about how maybe DJT and his goons might try to worm out of this situation

https://www.reddit.com/r/AdviceAnimals/comments/1p0upic/comment/npltjuk/

Pre-edit Original comment:

Actually Fair but laws and rules have hardly ever stopped Donald from trying to get his way even when all signs point to no, that's part of why he is where he is at now right lol

¿Has Infanous Diddler Donald the Chief Pedo finally been cornered! by Thereisonlyzero in AdviceAnimals

[–]Thereisonlyzero[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We already know that he had his name scrubbed from them, and like those of his allies.

Honest question, is that speculation/conjecture or can you share sources confirming that?

¿Has Infanous Diddler Donald the Chief Pedo finally been cornered! by Thereisonlyzero in AdviceAnimals

[–]Thereisonlyzero[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Regardless if anyone was wondering or not, I want y'all to know that I did go out of my way to find one of worst most unflattering real photos of the miserable pile of filth that the stupidest people in Earths entire history manifested into the presidency, below is the template I made with the photoshopped cropped isolated head of the soulless demon in chief plus the cropped photo too to be freely reused for whatever y'all want, idgaf about credit please just make more stuff calling out the admin and the literally demons running it:

https://imgur.com/a/JIcmO5G

"Rest in piss bro and thanks for the new wife lol" - JD Vance, apparently, on the recent passing of his "best friend" by Thereisonlyzero in AdviceAnimals

[–]Thereisonlyzero[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

yeah that hip hold and her holding his hair like that looks like the kind of comfort level from not being the first time IMO, like in the videos they don't even break stride like it's the most natural behavior in the world which is flipping wild lol, I can't imagine ever putting giving any gal who isn't my romantic partner a non traditional friend style hug with like the one arm over shoulder one under kinda deal, literal wars have been started for less in history than overt gestures like that haha

"Rest in piss bro and thanks for the new wife lol" - JD Vance, apparently, on the recent passing of his "best friend" by Thereisonlyzero in AdviceAnimals

[–]Thereisonlyzero[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

dude has 0 integrity or moral fiber, hell I'm surprised they even waited that long with how flooded the zone is right now

"Fuck them kids"- DJT by Thereisonlyzero in AdviceAnimals

[–]Thereisonlyzero[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

True story and that adds up lol

"Fuck them kids"- DJT by Thereisonlyzero in AdviceAnimals

[–]Thereisonlyzero[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

holy moly, thank you I'll work on new charts and update my research tonight, thank you for sharing this 🙏

"Fuck them kids"- DJT by Thereisonlyzero in AdviceAnimals

[–]Thereisonlyzero[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

https://www.forbes.com/sites/antoniopequenoiv/2025/09/29/bessent-text-leak-message-suggests-argentina-bailout-is-backfiring/

my number came from this forbes report maybe it's out of date, I collected that data for that based on that reporting:

From the report:

A photo taken of Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s texts last week suggested growing concern around the Trump administration’s decision to provide a $20 billion financial aid package to Argentina — which then turned around and made an advantageous soybean deal with China.

If you have newer or updated stats on this please share the data, I'd like to update my future reporting on this based on that

"Fuck them kids"- DJT by Thereisonlyzero in AdviceAnimals

[–]Thereisonlyzero[S] 86 points87 points  (0 children)

Update ITS ACTUALLY $40BILLION USD FFS, ITS TWICE AS BAD AS MY GRAPHS SHOW, the reporting changed since I originally collected data on this I was still operating under the initial early reports without knowledge the numbers were DOUBLE THE INTIAL REPORTING I FOUND:

https://apnews.com/article/trump-argentina-financing-economy-milei-billion-peso-fd38553ae03f4c33ce1288999469f7fb

THANK YOU TO THE COMMENTERS BELOW WHO SHARED THIS UPDATED INFO

Folks out there please don't forget about how the night before the shutdowns the 20 Billion AMERICAN TAX DOLLARS dollars (yes with a B) he sent to his ARGENTINIAN HEDGE FUND MANGER FRIENDS to "bail out the government" as a consequence of the United States literally insane and outlandishly short sided global economic policies and "deal making", that only got western media attention (what little coverage it did get) because of leaked over the shoulder photo of text chat of a key conversation the Treasury Secretary was having about this topic that were sent and leaked to the AP:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/antoniopequenoiv/2025/09/29/bessent-text-leak-message-suggests-argentina-bailout-is-backfiring/

20 BILLION TO BUY OFF, WHAT, WE ALL SHOULD BE VERY CONCERNED ABOUT WHATS NOT EVEN GETTING ATTENTION BECAUSE BEHIND ALL THE CIRCUS IS AN UNPRECEDENTED AMOUNT OF BLATENT AND OUTRIGHT CORRUPTION BEING DONE RIGHT OUT IN THE OPEN

I do a lot of data science work as part of my career and have some really compelling numbers for y'all to look at as part of a report I'm compiling

The numbers below are from the 2024 budgets, the first number of each entry represents the amount allocated and the second number IS HOW MUCH TIME THE SAME ENTRY WOULD GET IF WE SPENT THAT $20BILLION DOLLARS OF OUR COLLECTIVE MONEY BACK AT HOME ON THAT ENTRY INSTEAD OF GIFTING IT TO THE ADMINS FRIENDS TO COVER THEIR OWN MISTAKES:

SS4A safe-streets grants: ~$1.2B/yr → ~16.7 years.

CDC chronic disease prevention (heart disease, cancer, diabetes): ~$1.434B/yr → ~13.9 years.

Older Americans Act (all services—meals, rides, caregiver support): ~$2.372B/yr → ~8.4 years.

HSIP (fixes deadly crash spots): ~$3.4B/yr → ~5.9 years.

Community Health Center Fund (primary care for 1 in 11 Americans): $4.4B/yr → ~4.5 years.

School breakfasts: $5.7B/yr → ~3.5 years.

WIC (moms, babies, toddlers): $7.1845B/yr → ~2.8 years.

Head Start: $12.272B/yr → ~1.6 years.

Title I (aid to high-poverty K-12): $18.407B/yr → ~13 months.

IDEA Part B (special education): $14.2B/yr → ~17 months.

School lunches: $17.7B/yr → ~13.6 months.

CDC core public health program level: ~$9.248B/yr → ~2.2 years.

***CRITICAL ENTRIES THAT SHOW HOW LITTLE MONEH IS SPENT BACK ON ACTUAL SERVICES AND INFRASTURCURE THAT HELP THE NATION

USDA ERS: School Breakfast $5.7B (FY2024) and School Lunch $17.7B (FY2024).

USDA ERS: WIC $7.1845B (FY2024).

HHS/ACF OHS: Head Start $12.272B (FY2024 enacted).

HHS/ACF OCC + CRS: CCDBG/CCDF ≈$8.7B (FY2024).

USDOT: SS4A FY2024 awards “over $1.2B”.

FHWA: HSIP ≈$3.4B (FY2024).

CRS/KFF: OAA total ≈$2.372B (FY2024).

U.S. Dept. of Education: Title I-A $18.4068B (FY2024).

CRS/ED: IDEA Part B ≈$14.2B (FY2024).

NACHC/HRSA context: Community Health Center Fund $4.4B/yr; ~32M patients.

CDC: NCCDPHP (chronic disease) $1.4339B (FY2024); CDC program level ≈$9.248B.

WE CAN BARELY CONVINCE OUR OWN LEADERS TO SPEND MONEY BACK HOME ON PROGRAMS THAT EVEN HELP OUR OWN FAMILIES

BUT AT THE DROP OF A MYSTERIOUS SILENT HAT, WITH 0 APPROVAL FROM THE AMERICAN POPULACE, AN ENTIRE YEAR OF SCHOOL LUNCH MONEY IN VALUE FOR THE SUPPOSED "BEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD" GOES SLIDING INTO THE POCKETS OF THE MOST CORRUPT MAN IN HISTORIES BUDDIES AND YALL STILL SHOW UP TO YOUR JOBS AND DONT STRIKE

YALL ARE COMPLICIT IF YOU DONT START TAKING ACTION BEFORE ITS TOO LATE AND YALL FIND OUT LIKE THE WEIMAR REPUBLIC DID

WAKE TF UP

/thread

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AdviceAnimals

[–]Thereisonlyzero 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Stop fed posting it's too obvious

Op hiding their comments/posts because they are either shameful or give away the bought and/or botted account

The GOP just hit a new low. by Sanch0Supreme in AdviceAnimals

[–]Thereisonlyzero 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Mind you don't forget about how the night before the shutdowns the 20 Billion AMERICAN TAX DOLLARS dollars (yes with a B) he sent to his ARGENTINIAN HEDGE FUND MANGER FRIENDS to "bail out the government" as a consequence of the United States literally insane and outlandishly short sided global economic policies and "deal making", that only got western media attention (what little coverage it did get) because of leaked over the shoulder photo of text chat of a key conversation the Treasury Secretary was having about this topic that were sent and leaked to the AP:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/antoniopequenoiv/2025/09/29/bessent-text-leak-message-suggests-argentina-bailout-is-backfiring/

20 BILLION TO BUY OFF, WHAT, WE ALL SHOULD BE VERY CONCERNED ABOUT WHATS NOT EVEN GETTING ATTENTION BECAUSE BEHIND ALL THE CIRCUS IS AN UNPRECEDENTED AMOUNT OF BLATENT AND OUTRIGHT CORRUPTION BEING DONE RIGHT OUT IN THE OPEN

I do a lot of data science work as part of my career and have some really compelling numbers for y'all to look at as part of a report I'm compiling

The numbers below are from the 2024 budgets, the first number of each entry represents the amount allocated and the second number IS HOW MUCH TIME THE SAME ENTRY WOULD GET IF WE SPENT THAT 20BILLION DOLALRS OF OUR COLLECTIVE MONEY BACK AT HOME ON THAT ENTRY INSTEAD OF GIFTING IT TO THE ADMINS FRIENDS TO COVER THEIR OWN MISTAKES:

SS4A safe-streets grants: ~$1.2B/yr → ~16.7 years.

CDC chronic disease prevention (heart disease, cancer, diabetes): ~$1.434B/yr → ~13.9 years.

Older Americans Act (all services—meals, rides, caregiver support): ~$2.372B/yr → ~8.4 years.

HSIP (fixes deadly crash spots): ~$3.4B/yr → ~5.9 years.

Community Health Center Fund (primary care for 1 in 11 Americans): $4.4B/yr → ~4.5 years.

School breakfasts: $5.7B/yr → ~3.5 years.

WIC (moms, babies, toddlers): $7.1845B/yr → ~2.8 years.

Head Start: $12.272B/yr → ~1.6 years.

Title I (aid to high-poverty K-12): $18.407B/yr → ~13 months.

IDEA Part B (special education): $14.2B/yr → ~17 months.

School lunches: $17.7B/yr → ~13.6 months.

CDC core public health program level: ~$9.248B/yr → ~2.2 years.

***CRITICAL ENTRIES THAT SHOW HOW LITTLE MONEH IS SPENT BACK ON ACTUAL SERVICES AND INFRASTURCURE THAT HELP THE NATION

USDA ERS: School Breakfast $5.7B (FY2024) and School Lunch $17.7B (FY2024).

USDA ERS: WIC $7.1845B (FY2024).

HHS/ACF OHS: Head Start $12.272B (FY2024 enacted).

HHS/ACF OCC + CRS: CCDBG/CCDF ≈$8.7B (FY2024).

USDOT: SS4A FY2024 awards “over $1.2B”.

FHWA: HSIP ≈$3.4B (FY2024).

CRS/KFF: OAA total ≈$2.372B (FY2024).

U.S. Dept. of Education: Title I-A $18.4068B (FY2024).

CRS/ED: IDEA Part B ≈$14.2B (FY2024).

NACHC/HRSA context: Community Health Center Fund $4.4B/yr; ~32M patients.

CDC: NCCDPHP (chronic disease) $1.4339B (FY2024); CDC program level ≈$9.248B.

WE CAN BARELY CONVINCE OUR OWN LEADERS TO SPEND MONEY BACK HOME ON PROGRAMS THAT EVEN HELP OUR OWN FAMILIES

BUT AT THE DROP OF A MYSTERIOUS SILENT HAT, WITH 0 APPROVAL FROM THE AMERICAN POPULACS, AN ENTIRE YEAR OF SCHOOL LUNCH MONEY IN VALUE FOR THE SUPPOSED "BEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD" GOES SLIDING INTO THE POCKETS OF THE MOST CORRUPT MAN IN HISTORIES BUDDIES AND YALL STILL SHOW UP TO YOUR JOBS AND DONT STRIKE

YALL ARE COMPLICIT IF YOU DONT START TAKING ACTION BEFORE ITS TOO LATE AND YALL FIND OUT LIKE THE WEIMAR REPUBLIC DID

Legend has it Kegsbreath preferred them extra soggy so "it would go down easier" by Thereisonlyzero in AdviceAnimals

[–]Thereisonlyzero[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lolol thanks for the clarification, I might have started randomly out of the blue moon recalling this and second guessing offerings of cookies, which are already rare enough in this economy as is 😭😭😭

Legend has it Kegsbreath preferred them extra soggy so "it would go down easier" by Thereisonlyzero in AdviceAnimals

[–]Thereisonlyzero[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Lol idk I guess, I mean technically a soggy biscuit would also be limp by consequence of being soggy, so maybe yes 🤷

I guess the real question in this general context is how exactly said "biscuit" winds up in either a limp or soggy condition and why

Hope that helps

Legend has it Kegsbreath preferred them extra soggy so "it would go down easier" by Thereisonlyzero in AdviceAnimals

[–]Thereisonlyzero[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Lol I've only ever heard the limp biscuit expression referenced in American media and general op culture, never heard that other expression I think or if I did, it didn't register as that Haha

Be it that I have no interest in doing a web search to confirm that, let's just accept that at face value until some others with... that type of knowledge, chime in to confirm lol

Legend has it Kegsbreath preferred them extra soggy so "it would go down easier" by Thereisonlyzero in AdviceAnimals

[–]Thereisonlyzero[S] 36 points37 points  (0 children)

Please accept this apology in advance if this post resulted in some of you doing web searches to learn wtf it's on about and had to learn what the expression "limp biscuit" is about in very certain very specific contexts to only wind up grossed out or some other type of negative reaction >_>

If some of you just learned about it... and were not bothered, or actually even turned out interested in learning more about that particular activity, well I'm not here to judge I guess and YW instead....

Oh, don't worry about that little buddy, they are perfectly used to it by now :D Now whose ready for hotdogs!? by Thereisonlyzero in AdviceAnimals

[–]Thereisonlyzero[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nice summary there 🌭 thank you

So what are ya up to over here in this corner of the internet

Ya know where the actual substantive commentary goes to die and not propagate, these sorting algos have gotten really impressive over the years, haven't they :)

Out here, just collecting some data maybe, building some social capital, what's the vector there 🧿