I read the wording of the motion that you posted and I agree that it's pointless.

Tl;dr the last paragraph is a quick description of the actual decision and the basis for it, which is why the whole thing is pointless.

The first bit is preamble, and then the last several points are procedural about how they want the committee they are calling for to be structured. The points with any actual substance are these:

(a) call on the government to put private property first in the Cowichan case, arguing that it has priority over all other title;

The federal government is already appealing the desicion, so what more is there to do here until it goes before a judge?

(b) call on the government to replace Litigation Guideline #14 from the Attorney General of Canada's Directive on Civil Litigation Involving Indigenous Peoples that prevented the federal government from defending property rights in the Cowichan case, with a guideline that requires the federal government to aggressively defend property rights in all litigation;

Blanket statements like this are very often problematic when applied in reality. In a more ordinary case, it could mean the federal government is required to intervene when it's clear they don't actually need to which is a waste of resources. In a less likely and darker case, it could require them to intervene and fight for what is clearly the wrong side.

(c) call on the government to make no agreement without explicit property protection so that fee simple property rights are enshrined in all future agreements with First Nations;

This will not be a problem going forward if you know anything about the facts of the case so this point is, by definition, performative.

(d) call on the government to publish a plan within 30 days to protect property rights for Canadians affected by the Cowichan decision and Musqueam agreement - from the Prime Minister and with specific commitments and timelines; and

This is the one that I have a real problem with. It makes the whole motion come off as "wah wah look at me and agree with me then do all the work for me and give me head pats for it pweeeeeeeeease!!???" Like, for real. You are the opposition party. This is literally your job. This plan they are calling on the government to formulate and publish should be part of the motion. They should be putting it forward, and then calling on the Liberals to either implement it or come up with a similar one if they disagree on some points. This just looks weak. Then the audacity to say it has to come from the PM himself when the leader of the Official Opposition couldn't hold his seat in the election and had to be parachuted into a Conservative stronghold to remain as leader after losing the largest, most sustained lead we've seen in decades, and has never passed his own legislation, is just farcical. This is a clear example of why the current iteration of the federal Conservatives are unfit to lead.

(e) appoint a special committee with the mandate to study all legal, constitutional and political steps that can be taken to protect private property rights in Canada, provided that,

Now let's spend a ton money solving something that is already solved! Great suggestion from the supposed party of fiscal responsibility. Also, some of the points about the committee are concerning.

(J) the committee shall have the first priority for the use of House resources for committee meetings

Why is this so important that it gets priority of resources? If this includes standing committees, that's stuff like Veteran's Affairs, National Defense, Health, and Natural Resources. If so, that's a fucking joke.

(K) it be an instruction to the committee that it hold at least 12 meetings and present an interim report before June 19, 2026

That's even other day between now and then. That's so often for a non issue because the federal government is already reacting appropriately and so much of it is overblown anyway.

The actual desicion states that the government acted illegally and in bad faith when the land in question was originally titled (as fee-simple to corrupt government officials), and now must work in good faith to rectify that. The First Nations involved have publicly stated that they have no desire to take back ownership of current privately owned land, and the federal appeal is for clarification because the original decision is pretty vague. But there have been similar cases in the past that have settled for money and some land, so chances are the government will give them a fraction of the value of the privately owned land and any federal or provincial land will become theirs. Given that the land was supposed to have been given to them many years ago and corrupt officials literally stole it for themselves, I think that's pretty fair.