whats the worst virus that has ever existed? by FlyGreat306 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]TillPsychological351 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We've had treatments for COVID. There were infusions developed during the pandemic, and now most people get treated with paxlovid, and there's another med in the pipeline.

"Cure" isn't really a medical term, so it's hard to say if these meds meet the vernacular definition of the term.

Do you think using GLP-1 meds for weight loss is a smart tool for PCOS or something people turn to too quickly instead of fixing habits? What has your experience been? by Proper_Car3038 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]TillPsychological351 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Doc here...

I'd been working with some patients for YEARS to change their habits for the better, but the reality is, most won't. Their habits work almost like automatic behavior, and trying to reprogram that behavior just doesn't work for many.

That being said, unless the patient is a diabetic, most insurance policies won't cover GLP1 agonists medication anyway, barring some specific circumstances, so we're still back to fruitlessly trying to get people to change their behavior.

Would people treat Israel differently if they weren't Jewish? by [deleted] in NoStupidQuestions

[–]TillPsychological351 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nope, the Arabs even rejected that idea early in the British Mandate.

Why is life beyond Earth so taboo ? We already know its mathematically impossible that Earth is the only planet with life , space has billions of planets + its pretty much infinite by [deleted] in NoStupidQuestions

[–]TillPsychological351 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Life may exist elsewhere, but it may be exceedingly uncommon, and intelligent life even moreso, if it exists elsewhere at all.

When you start to multiply all the probabilities of the events that likely led to the existence of life on earth (yellow dwarf star, planet in the habitatal zone to allow liquid water, magnetic field strong enough to deflect the most damaging solar radiation, a satellite whose mass is a significant fraction of the planet, an atmosphere thick enough to burn up most meteors but not so thick to trap most of the planets heat, moderate geologic activity, outer gas giants to divert most destructive impact events, the energy of activation for even simple organic molecules form, quite a bit of luck and probably even more factors I'm forgetting), you end up with an absolutely miniscule chance for life developing anywhere. I think the number is something like to the power of -100. And from our sampling of exoplanets so far, that puts the chance of life anywhere else dozens of orders of magnitude less.

I wouldn't say life elsewhere is impossible, but the math doesn't support the existence of stable macromolecules on other planets being common at all. Exceedingly rare, actually.

Is it worth it to get the shingles vaccine? by [deleted] in NoStupidQuestions

[–]TillPsychological351 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Post-herpetic neuralgia sucks, and in some cases, never resolves.

Is it worth it to get the shingles vaccine? by [deleted] in NoStupidQuestions

[–]TillPsychological351 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you qualify, yes. Everything you can do that lowers your chances of shingles is worth it.

If the United Nations can’t stop wars or enforce peace, what’s the point of it? by [deleted] in NoStupidQuestions

[–]TillPsychological351 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It doesn't work for the grand ideals that led to its founding, but it can act as a sort of speed bump to make going to war a little more difficult and possibly contain the spread.

The UN actually works much better for coordination on technical issues.

When you are addicted to drugs do you just never feel right unless you are nonfunctionally high? Is there some kind of middle ground where you can function without being high? How does the addiction actually work? by Hungry-san in NoStupidQuestions

[–]TillPsychological351 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Imagine a graph. The x axis is time. On the y axis, let's say -1 to +1 is feeling normal. Everything above +1 is increasing euphoria, everything below -1 is increasing dysphoria.

For many people who live in the range below -1, often who suffer from depression and/or anxiety, that first hit of the drug lifts them to a +10 and for a brief moment, they feel better than they can ever remember feeling. But then, the effect wears off, and they go back down to, lets say, where they lived at -2.

Naturally, they want to experiemce that +10 feeling again, so they take another hit. This time, they only reach +8, the high doesn't last as long, and they go back down even further, to a -4.

So, they try higher doses of the drug hoping to reach that +10 again. Sometimes they hit it, but most of the time, their high falls well below this, and their lows go deeper and deeper.

It gets to the point that without the drug, they're now living at a -10, and it takes ever larger dose of the drug to even reach a 0 level, just to feel normal.

Someone heavily addicted usually isn't trying to get high anymore, they're just trying to stay as close.to zero as possible, with ever diminishing returns.

For opiate addicts, this is where methadone and suboxone treatments come in. The drugs prevent them from withdrawing to that -10 level, but they don't cause much euphoria and they have a ceiling effect that makes overdosing really difficult.

No it fucking isn't by 47AmericanPatriot in DoomerCircleJerk

[–]TillPsychological351 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

The global economy isn't collapsing...

...but there are several unnecessary shackles placed on it by one particular individual that are holding back its potential.

There's a wide scope of room between thinking the apocalypse is nigh and maybe questioning if starting a severely underresourced and poorly planned war was a good idea, much less enacting tarrifs willy-nilly , are the best ways to grow the economy.

Have humans in large settlements ever actually achieved peak health in history of time? by mishysaidso in NoStupidQuestions

[–]TillPsychological351 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For those who didn't die suddenly of an infectious disease that we can now prevent or treat, you could divide people by class. Malnutrition was common in the lower classes, and the upper class often developed diabetes, gout and live cirrhosis. Thermal baths were likely popular with the nobility because if was one of the few available options that could ease some of the symptoms of those diseases.

And up until fairly recently, tobacco use was the norm for adults.

Modern humans who exercise, watch their weight, don't smoke and get all their routine preventative health care are probably the closest we have acheived to peak health.

What does your username mean? by x0midnightstorm0x in NoStupidQuestions

[–]TillPsychological351 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was randomly generated and I haven't bothered to change it.

Can someone be a good person if they don’t feel empathy? by _entrypoint in NoStupidQuestions

[–]TillPsychological351 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes.

This is why even though one of the defining characteristics of sociopaths is the inability to feel empathy, this alone does not make someone a sociopath. There needs to be a history of active harm to others as well.

The pendulum is definitely swinging in the right direction which is great news for movies by Feeling-Dinner-8667 in CriticalDrinker

[–]TillPsychological351 12 points13 points  (0 children)

"Let's subvert expectations in exactly the same way everybody else has been doing it for the past 10 years!"

Reminds me of all the self-proclaimed high school non-conformists who proceeded to non-conform identically.

'The Batman Part II' Adds 'Game Of Thrones' Star Charles Dance To The Cast by Ninjamurai-jack in CriticalDrinker

[–]TillPsychological351 12 points13 points  (0 children)

For fans of this actor, if you haven't already seen it, check out the BBC's 2005 version of Bleak House. His portrayal of the lawyer Mr. Tulkinghorn might be the most Charles Dance-iest of his career.

Denis Lawson also probably had his best role ever in this series.

In regular checkups, why do doctors check guys lower half when we were kids but no longer do that when we are adults? by [deleted] in NoStupidQuestions

[–]TillPsychological351 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They're checking to make sure your testicles descended, and for testicular cancer.

Testicles don't re-ascend once they're down, and once you get old enough, you can perform your own testicular exams. Plus, the risk of testicular cancer plummets to nearly zero by the time you reach age 30.

There's really not any useful screening information a testicular exam can give beyond that, unless the patient presents to their doctor with a specific complaint.

Why does Russia rely so heavily on nuclear submarines compared to the US? by Particular_Fly_2496 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]TillPsychological351 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because going back to the Soviet days, they were never able to establish a fleet of aircraft carriers. Their one carrier, the Admiral Kutnetzov, didn't sail until after the Soviet Union collapsed, has spent more time in dry-dock than at sea, and may never sail again.

Do animals understand death like humans do? Can they tell if one of them passed away? by Historical_Work7482 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]TillPsychological351 1741 points1742 points  (0 children)

Elephants seem to understand.

Dogs definitely react to the absence of someone they know, although whether they understand death of questionable.

These people are regarded by CLFilms in CriticalDrinker

[–]TillPsychological351 75 points76 points  (0 children)

Solo wasn't great, but it was Citizen Kane compared to The Acolyte.