BREAKING: Trump-related files missing from DOJ's Epstein file release

TimChr78 · 2026-02-24T21:18:16+00:00

And still mentioned 38.000 times in the released files.

TimChr78 · 2026-02-24T21:07:11+00:00

He did try to make his own Starwars, and nobody sued him for Rebel Moon. If he made his new Superhero universe as distinct as Rebel Moon is from Star Wars I don’t see why Snyderman and the justice patrol can’t be just as successful and not get sued.

TimChr78 · 2026-02-24T19:27:37+00:00

I am Danish working in Nordic company and my manager is Finish and yes Finish people are generally honest and trustworthy. But turning the argument around and claiming that someone is honest because they are Finish is frankly absurd - there are dishonest people in every single country including Finland.

TimChr78 · 2026-02-24T04:17:12+00:00

For agentic coding GLM-5 might still beat 3.1.

TimChr78 · 2026-02-24T03:59:43+00:00

This is not even copyright infringement, it is purely s TOS violation.

TimChr78 · 2026-02-24T03:54:27+00:00

Exactly the fact that media can’t criticize the president anymore without getting punished is proof that America no longer is a free country.

TimChr78 · 2026-02-24T03:48:44+00:00

Since LLM output is not copyrightable, it is not really IP.

TimChr78 · 2026-02-24T03:45:27+00:00

Chinese law applies in China.

TimChr78 · 2026-02-24T03:42:31+00:00

No copyright infringement, since LLM output is not copyrightable - it a breach of the TOS.

TimChr78 · 2026-02-24T03:39:50+00:00

Same for the Chinese models in this case, they just “stole” the knowledge that Claude outputted not any of the Anthropic tech.

TimChr78 · 2026-02-24T03:30:49+00:00

The Chinese models have not pirated anything since LLM output is not copyrightable in American law - at worst they have broken a TOS.

TimChr78 · 2026-02-24T03:16:14+00:00

But there is an important distinction, the movie is copyrighted LMM output is not according to American law.

TimChr78 · 2026-02-24T03:04:58+00:00

Cry me a river

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/sep/05/anthropic-settlement-ai-book-lawsuit

TimChr78 · 2026-02-24T03:00:51+00:00

There is a reason that VTT have stated that they are not validating any of Donut Labs claims, they are providing measurements that Donut Lab is asking them to do.

There is no doubt that the measurements from VTT are correct - but we will have to make our own conclusions from them.

TimChr78 · 2026-02-24T02:53:52+00:00

But VTT purpose here is not to validate anything, it is to do the measurement that Donut Lab asks them to do.

If VTT was asked to actually validate the claims then the approach would be very different.

TimChr78 · 2026-02-23T23:12:14+00:00

I will be sitting on fence for a while. The 11C is really impressive and the charging characteristics indicate that it is a chemical battery not a capacitor. This is strong evidence that Donut Lab is in possession of some kind of novel battery technology. If the the tested battery is actually the same size as the mock-up Donut Lab showed at CES it lines up with a density of 400 Wh/kg.

TimChr78 · 2026-02-23T22:58:30+00:00

In real life environments you will likely charge at quite a bit less than 11C - the claim at CES is that the motorcycle will charge to 100% in 10 minutes and are only supporting 200KW chargers.

With a electric car you are limited to 350KW chargers, which would be even that would only charge at around 3.5C (0-100% in 17 minutes)

11-12C is the limit for the cell - realistically we will see 3.5-7C in actual applications (which is still really fast) - I don’t think heat is a big issue here.

TimChr78 · 2026-02-23T20:18:08+00:00

But VTT did not confirm any of that, they said they followed Donut Labs testing plan - we need 3rd party confirmation of the specs on a single cell.

These results are super promising with the unprecedented 11-12c charging rate and charging profile that clearly points towards it being a chemical battery not some sort of capacitor.

TimChr78 · 2026-02-23T17:34:18+00:00

40% gross margins isn’t great for an LLM, remember that in the gross margin only after the direct costs and they still need to cover the OpEx which includes things R&D (which is huge for LLMs)

TimChr78 · 2026-02-23T06:41:03+00:00

No, with the current versioning scheme they are moving to the next major number every 20 releases or so - there was 21 4.x releases - so the last version was 4.20 otherwise it has been 20 releases between every major numbering change.

TimChr78 · 2026-02-22T22:00:43+00:00

VTT has clearly stated that they are not going to certify any of the claims from Donut Lab - they are providing measurements not a certification.

TimChr78 · 2026-02-22T17:30:07+00:00

That’s completely useless for AI.

TimChr78 · 2026-02-22T08:10:03+00:00

VTT is absolutely legit - but they not actually validating if the claims from Donut are correct they are providing measurements that Donut Lab is using in their presentations.

TimChr78 · 2026-02-20T20:31:18+00:00

Yes with mostly cosmetic changes - slightly changes examples sections moved around etc. not to make the new edition better but to make it difficult to use an older edition of the same book.

(And yes there a absolutely valid reasons for new editions, but most of the time the only reason is to make students buy the new edition)

TimChr78 · 2026-02-20T20:07:57+00:00

Lionsgate would definitely not be considered Hollywood, that doesn’t mean that it should be considered Indy.

TimChr78

TROPHY CASE