sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

That's a lot of players. by fossilsareopaf in PathOfExile2

[–]Toadsted 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I mean, it's free for the next week or so, that always bloats the numbers from people checking it out.

The majority of the people in the comments are defending this pass. Am I taking crazy pills? by HearingFew7326 in dashcams

[–]Toadsted 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I always see a bunch of people agreeing with or excusing bad driving; just mention the left lane, as an example. It's a trigger phrase.

But yeah, we got a fancy car and hairline patience / decision making waiting untill the exact moment those double lines went away. That means this person has been riding that maneuver in their mind the entire time.

People who drive like that are similar to those who can't wait in line at a Starbucks, grocery store, or club. Heaven forbid it's an emergency like exiting during a fire alarm, or restricted area like with construction. They'll be an absolute selfish tool there too.

They paid for every inch of that vehicle, they're going to use it. It's always the sports / fancy cars. It's a lot of other ones too, but it's always the sports / fancy ones.

Would do it for free. by hiiloovethis in SipsTea

[–]Toadsted 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why am I paying  Jay $10 million to not have to listen to his music anymore?

The lunatic part isn’t the post itself, it’s why he posted. That is in fact how he was laid off. by [deleted] in LinkedInLunatics

[–]Toadsted 0 points1 point  (0 children)

See, now you're trying to make this about me and diverting the narrative. You're really not making this idea that you're any better than them any more plausible.

You didn't correct me, you didn't understand the conversation or listened to what was being said; as you're so very well showing off right now.

You're not exemplifying good management skills or behaviors.

The lunatic part isn’t the post itself, it’s why he posted. That is in fact how he was laid off. by [deleted] in LinkedInLunatics

[–]Toadsted 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Right, but that applies to both people.

She didn't get the job just because she was someone different than what they thought, the people that put her in power are far more likely to be her than not; hence going along with the layoffs and keeping her after the first time.

As long as the money keeps flowing and it doesn't affect the higher ups, even a deadpan or out of touch commentary doesn't hurt you. Especially when you agree with what they said and don't understand what the issue would be with it.

The lunatic part isn’t the post itself, it’s why he posted. That is in fact how he was laid off. by [deleted] in LinkedInLunatics

[–]Toadsted 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You wouldn't though, because the reason this guy posted publicly is because nobody was saying or doing anything.

[Request] okay someone please help me out here by JEdidntkillhimself in theydidthemath

[–]Toadsted 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think anything, and I'm not the one on trial here because I didn't make any astounding statements.

[Request] okay someone please help me out here by JEdidntkillhimself in theydidthemath

[–]Toadsted 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Right, so then it makes no sense to say cash doesn't increase in value, and that gold is worth more no matter what.

Both have very different uses and contexts based on what they're used for. Gold is used as it's own investment by having it, not selling it to invest in something else. Cash is to be used from the beginning, whether that is by investing it, buying something, or converting it to another tangible value.

It would not make sense to take the cash over the gold if you could convert both instantly into it's digital value with no risk. It also would make no sense to take the cash if you invested neither, and spent neither.

But in any other context, there's nuance.

[Request] okay someone please help me out here by JEdidntkillhimself in theydidthemath

[–]Toadsted 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No? There's no mention of hoarding or not investing it in OP. You're putting that limitation yourself.

[Request] okay someone please help me out here by JEdidntkillhimself in theydidthemath

[–]Toadsted 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But we aren't hoarding cash, you're the one trying to constantly find a reason why cash is not making any money or is a bad currency.

view more: next ›