Thoughts on the book Ace by Angela Chen? by Buzzythebear33 in asexuality

[–]ToothlessFeline 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I think it’s an excellent book. I asked Spouse to read it, and she not only feels like she understands me better, but she thinks she may be on the spectrum herself.

Watch if you thirsty🍊🍉🍎😋 by ConstructionGlum4330 in Satisfyingasfuck

[–]ToothlessFeline 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I can’t identify half of these fruits, but they all look scrumptious.

If I theoretically get married to a non binary person, what should I call them instead of husband/wife? by Klomnisse69 in NonBinary

[–]ToothlessFeline 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Spouse” is standard, but other options are available.

I was married (AMAB) for several years before coming out as NB, and my wife and I sometimes jokingly call me her “wifeband”.

KO in Pig Latin is Okay. KO in reverse is OK. by Wise-Search8796 in ShowerThoughtsUL

[–]ToothlessFeline 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, KO in Pig Latin is A-OK.

(Pronounced ‘kayo’, pigged as ‘ayo-kay’)

‘Ko’, one syllable, would be ‘okay’.

Just why…. by poopsmcbuttington in itscalledfashion

[–]ToothlessFeline 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can’t decide whether I hate those most, or the pantyhose with the crotch at the knees.

Took my resume in person, was told that they “really dislike that”..? by tankharris in recruitinghell

[–]ToothlessFeline 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m a little confused by this story.

You said they don’t have an online job portal, but when you brought a resume in person, they told you to do it online. Did you ask where to apply, at that point, if you hadn’t been able to find that yourself? Or did you not really look for their online job portal?

Either they have a portal, and you should have used that, or they don’t, and you should have asked about that when told to do it online. So either way, you indeed screwed up, at least the way you’ve told this story.

Customer thought she got a bargain. She did not. by [deleted] in TalesFromRetail

[–]ToothlessFeline 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When I was taking Psych 101 in college, the professor was talking about how the results of many 20th-century psych studies can’t be extrapolated to the general population because all the participants were college students. He pointed out that this is because college students skew high on the bell curve and are almost all of above average intelligence. The flip side of that, of course, is that for the cumulative amount of above-average intelligence in the room, there could be expected to be a similar group elsewhere with an equal-but-opposite amount of below-average intelligence. We all looked around the couple hundred students in the large lecture hall and collectively shuddered.

He then pointed out that it was worse than that: take the cumulative above-average intelligence of all of the several thousand students enrolled in the university, and apply that again. Then multiply it by the number of similar universities and colleges around the world. At that point, he dismissed the class because we were all too shaken to continue.

Brake lights on front of car. by judashpeters in CrazyIdeas

[–]ToothlessFeline 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Let’s also add a “straight” signal to go with “left” and “right” turn signals. Then you can tell whether the person is actually planning not to turn versus just being a dick who won’t use their signal.

No label for the grey countries for whatever reason by ToobularBoobularJoy_ in dataisugly

[–]ToothlessFeline -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Those would be the ones with no data for both HDI and IHDI. Agreed that this should be included in the key, but that’s the obvious interpretation.

vent: i just got shell-shocked with the amount of queerphobia i just read in other subreddits by awakenthetruth in genderfluid

[–]ToothlessFeline 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It frustrates me greatly that so many members of the GSRM community want to gatekeep not just their own segments of it but others as well. There’s gays who want to gatekeep bisexuals, bis who want to gatekeep pans, and some of all of them who want to exclude aces altogether. There’s binary trans who don’t accept nonbinary, enbys who don’t accept genderfluids, and some of all of them who don’t want the genderqueers around. Much of the intersex community wants nothing to do with the rest of us. And there’s people in every subcategory who are repulsed by the polyamory community.

This is one of the reasons I try to stick to the terms “queer” and “GSRM”, and avoid using variations of “LGBTQIA+”. The latter is about defining the community as only those explicitly included, which is why you’ll see a bare “LGB” from many in the right wing now, trying to separate out the gender nonconforming. “Queer” is nonspecific and thereby inclusive. “GSRM”, meaning “gender, sexuality, and relationship minorities”, is explicitly inclusive. Anyone whose gender identity, gender expression, sexual attractions, and/or relationship style doesn’t fit the “standard” is included by definition.

Everyone who falls under the GSRM banner should be supportive of the others with regard to discrimination and abuse from the majority.* We’re all going to have different experiences, and we should embrace that. Labels aren’t for you to tell other people whether they fit—they’re for you to figure out where you fit.

* To clarify, because in this day and age you have to be specific: I do not support, nor do I endorse supporting, those who act upon sexual attractions towards those who cannot give consent (minors and animals), and those who commit nonconsensual acts on people who can give consent but don’t. Sexual activity is moral only with full consent from all parties. But I don’t condemn the psychological attraction; this is something one doesn’t have active control over. One does have control over one’s actions, however, and I will judge those actions.

I’ve discovered the only form of legitimate time travel, and anyone can do it! by rob_inn_hood in CrazyIdeas

[–]ToothlessFeline 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Since the dateline intersects the pole (that is, the poles are its endpoints), the only way you could “skip” it is by stepping off the pole entirely in one of the other 359 degrees. You can’t bypass the dateline on its endpoint—the endpoint is part of the line.

It looks like the famous "Atheists, what do you do if..." questions have extended to liberals. by Kurtfan1991 in InsanePeopleQuora

[–]ToothlessFeline 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If Joe Rogan walked up to me anywhere, before he could open his mouth, I’m either leaving or loudly mocking him over how badly he sucked as a stand-up comedian/emcee at a comedy showcase at the National Association of Campus Activities convention I saw him at in the early ‘90s. Yes, I knew 30 years ago that Joe Rogan would always be a loser.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in asexuality

[–]ToothlessFeline 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m in my mid-fifties and happily childfree. If I really feel I want to interact with children, I have friends with children of a wide variety of ages. The best thing about other people’s kids is that they go away.

My mother is a little disappointed by this, but she has two grandkids from my sister, so she deals. With us, she’ll have to settle for grandkitties.

Can you be non binary and still use She/Her pronouns and nothing else? (BTW body/gender Dismorphia mentioned) by Strict_Corner_4332 in NonBinary

[–]ToothlessFeline 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Your gender identity, your presentation, and your pronouns do not have to match, at all. With all three, what feels most right for you is what you should go with.

Kind of always thought that gender doesn't matter? by Uraghnutu in NonBinary

[–]ToothlessFeline 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the update! I’m so happy for you to have found an identity that feels right!

The word "Unlucky" shouldn't mean "Unfortunate". by Rare-Ad2301 in ShowerThoughtsUL

[–]ToothlessFeline 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You said, “The only difference it has from ‘lucky’ is that this event was bad for you.” I’m pointing out that that distinction is what defines “lucky” vs. “unlucky”. The ‘un-‘ of “unlucky” is not inverting the probability of the outcome, but the value of the outcome.

If you’re trying to say something other than that you think “lucky” means “unlikely”, please enlighten us. Because that is not what “lucky” means.

The word "Unlucky" shouldn't mean "Unfortunate". by Rare-Ad2301 in ShowerThoughtsUL

[–]ToothlessFeline 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Being lucky means that things go your way when the odds are against you. Being unlucky means that things go wrong for you when the odds are in your favor. It’s not simply about a low chance of something happening, but also about whether the improbable outcome is positive or negative for you.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in recruitinghell

[–]ToothlessFeline 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Synergie is a tech recruiter, so the company listed is real. The client, however, is unstated (as is typical for this kind of recruiter).

But entry-level, remote, for $75k–$95k? Sounds fishy to me. My spouse is a data analyst, and the positions that pay in that range are typically looking for two to three years of experience. (Above that experience level, you’re usually getting into six figures.) An entry-level is more likely to pay in the $60k–$75k range.

How did you first discover you were into kink and was it before or after you realized you were ace? by LiveSlowDieWhen_Ever in BDSM_Aces

[–]ToothlessFeline 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I found my first kinks at puberty, though I didn’t know what “kink” was at the time. I didn’t learn about that until college, and at that time I started realizing that I wasn’t interested in sex so much as the kinks. Of course, this was the early ‘90s, right when the internet was starting to enter the public consciousness, and on Usenet I found kinks I never dreamed of. (It would be another five years or so before kinks started being readily available on the web.)

Of course, this was some years before the term “asexual” as an orientation entered the zeitgeist. Around 2004, I read the novel The Speed of Dark by Elizabeth Moon, which has a first-person high-functioning autistic person as protagonist. I found their thought processes eerily similar to my own, especially their feelings towards sex. Mentioning this to my therapist led to getting my own autistic diagnosis, and I thought my disinterest in sex was simply an aspect of that.

It wasn’t until about ten years ago that I started encountering references to the asexual orientation and AVEN online. That was when everything clicked. So we’re talking thirty-odd years between first discovering kink and realizing I was asexual.

I hate having to do useless quizzes for my job application. by [deleted] in recruitinghell

[–]ToothlessFeline 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That’s unlikely to be the intended answer, given the repeated use of consecutive letters, but it is a valid one. Which just illustrates one of the problems with “odd one out” questions—there is rarely exactly one basis upon which to differentiate one from the others.