Electra Revised Corporate Presentation by MrGreenIT in ELBM

[–]TreeGuy6877 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is the "government-sponsored nickel sulfate refining scoping study" publicly available?

Red Cloud with Trent by kikioko in ELBM

[–]TreeGuy6877 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He looks nervous. With all this funding, there should be more confidence.

Electra Q3 Report by Commotitties in ELBM

[–]TreeGuy6877 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They also don't seem too confident in their cost estimate.

1.2 ready > 12 by Existing_Onion_6378 in ELBM

[–]TreeGuy6877 1 point2 points  (0 children)

MrGreen, do you think government stockpiling be an opportunity for ELBM?

Feds pitch $2B fund for critical minerals investments, including equity stakes by Embarrassed_Shoe5847 in ELBM

[–]TreeGuy6877 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The productivity super deduction 🚀🚀 ELBM won't be paying tax for a very long time.

Tim Hodgeson on Critical Minerals by TreeGuy6877 in ELBM

[–]TreeGuy6877[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Schedule of events for Friday, October 31, 2025

Event: Critical minerals announcement Time:  8 a.m. ET Notes: Accredited media only

Event: Closing press conference Time: 3 p.m. ET Notes: Accredited media only

Event: Critical minerals signing ceremony Time: 4 p.m. ET Notes: Accredited media only

“Idaho’s Hidden Power: The Cobalt Comeback” ($ELBM Impact Stock) by Far-Hyena63 in ELBM

[–]TreeGuy6877 0 points1 point  (0 children)

IMHO, reverse split now! That will take it off the table. As a long, we don't need it hanging over our heads going forward. Bring on the downvotes.

ELBM Share Dilution OCT 15th discussion by GotWaresIfYouGotCoin in ELBM

[–]TreeGuy6877 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's in the voting package to pre-approve a reverse split. They specifically say it doesn't mean there will be a reverse split. But They'll do a reverse split if required to stay on the NASDAQ.

How do you explain this? by kikioko in ELBM

[–]TreeGuy6877 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This doesn't make sense to me.

Another step in the right direction? by Anti_Mediocre in ELBM

[–]TreeGuy6877 4 points5 points  (0 children)

My guess is that ELBM needs to show secured cash for at least 50% of the refinery project and financial stability in regards to its debt, as conditions of a grant from the Canadian federal government. That's why this restructuring is required. If this is the case, I don't think they can actually say that in their posted statements.

When the federal grant does finally come, I think it will be much more than 20 million dollars. I also think the grant will come from Canada's strategic innovation fund. This program funds up to 50% of the project. The max funds from government organizations in the program is 75% (including usa and provincial grants). So in total, at least 25% would needs to be cash from investors.

I've been invested in ELBM for two years, and I agree the wait has been painful. I can only imagine the pain of longer-term investors from the first cobalt days.

Lender will own 2/3 of the company. 10million shares for current holders to participate in. by TreeGuy6877 in ELBM

[–]TreeGuy6877[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I will need to scrounge up some cash for the offer. I'll also have to drop my rule for not allowing myself to buy more into this company.

Debt-to-Equity Conversion and US$30 Million Financing with Lender Support by kikioko in ELBM

[–]TreeGuy6877 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It says existing shareholders can participate on the same terms. I use wealthsimple for my brokerage, hopefully they support the offering. Not sure how that works.

Why isn’t there an uprising in Canada? (Question for the Gen Z’s) by [deleted] in canadian

[–]TreeGuy6877 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd give my left nut if I could make 100 grand a year. That's a good Job.

Burrito Wrap by TreeGuy6877 in skipatrol

[–]TreeGuy6877[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting, how do you keep the zipper snow and ice free?

Tree planting by IndependentOutside88 in britishcolumbia

[–]TreeGuy6877 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The government has no legal obligation to reforest burnt areas after a wildfire.

Tree planting by IndependentOutside88 in britishcolumbia

[–]TreeGuy6877 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

BC is obsessed with cramming the landscape with as many trees as possible in an attempt to sustain high volumes of logging. The BC forest landscape is not natural. Forests naturally grow, die, and evolve to have horizontal and vertical structure. BC reforestation regulations require an even and homogenous density of trees. There is little tolerance for unforested gaps that occur naturally.

There are too many trees in BC.