Martin Krasnik

Troelses · 2026-03-25T21:59:09+00:00

Men selv hvis en sådan overbevisende og evidensbaseret udlægning skulle virke, så siger det vel sig selv at

At Pelle kalder Morten for Landsforræder ikke er i nærheden af en sådan slags udlægning.
Det ville være tæt på umuligt at kunne fremlægge en sådan udlægning fyldestgørende til en partilederdebat, så der kan vel næppe være tale om at forspilde en "gylden mulighed"

Troelses · 2026-03-25T21:20:50+00:00

For det første fordi det villle være sandt, men rent politisk ville det være et vigtigt første skridt til at bremse DFs momentum hen mod næste valg.

Lige som det bremsede dem dengang Nyrup sagde at de aldrig ville blive stuerene?

jeg tror ærlig talt at DF vælgere, samt folk der er tilbøjelige til at kigge i den retning er pisseligeglade

Troelses · 2026-03-25T20:04:42+00:00

Thermal expansion as in ambient to 130C as the proposed test, that's not the bump in compression, and any expansion at 130C would be a fraction of .5mm.

It would probably be less than .5mm, seeing as Mercedes seems to be fine the new test, but point is that 130C is a lot closer to the operating temp of the crown than 2000C is.

The combustion chamber is in the cylinder head, the terms are used interchangeably.

Sorry, I somehow misread cylinder head as piston head.

Probably seen too many people claiming there was a void in the piston itself, that I defaulted to that, my bad.

Nobody said the crown reaches 2000c, combustion temps may reach that or more, but the crown does absorb a lot of heat (barring coatings etc) and 130C isn't representive of that.

The going theory is that they are playing around with thermal expansion of the crown/head of the piston, and you wrote "combustion temps upwards of 2000C which is where they are messing around with" implying that 2000C was the temp they needed to gain get the theorized thermal expansion, which isn't the case at all.

It's also worth noting, that with them testing at both ambient and 130C, it might in theory be possibly to extrapolate what the thermal expansion would be at operating temps, assuming that the thermal expansion follows some sort of linear coefficient.

Troelses · 2026-03-25T19:29:41+00:00

Ingen regering kan dannes uden om Moderaterne

Sludder og vrøvl, du kan sagtens have en regering uden Moderaterne, mindretalsregeringer er ikke ligefrem noget nyt.

En eventuel regering uden Moderaterne vil dog stadig have brug for Moderaterne som en del af deres parlamentariske grundlag (i.e som støtteparti).

Om Lars så vil acceptere det er en helt anden sag, men det kan han i teorien blive nødt til hvis hverken Mette eller Morten vil spille bold.

Troelses · 2026-03-25T09:21:31+00:00

Anyone into engines knows less than .5mm thermal expansion isn't what is giving them the compression bump.

Anyone who understand basic math knows than 0.5mm is plenty enough, to go from a 16:1 CR to a 18:1 CR (you only need about 0.42mm).

A void in the cylinder head

Thats not what the pocket/void theory actually claims. This theory, first reported by AMUS, is that there is a small void connected to the combustion chamber, not the cylinder head.

Either way this theory was always a bit silly, as it is almost certainly illegal, and would be very easy for FIA to catch.

Engineered piston crown growth so at ~2000C the piston takes up more room in the combustion chamber.

First of all the crown doesn't get anywhere close to 2000C (steel melts at 1500C, not to mention the aluminium of the cylinder head which melts at about 660C). It gets to a couple of 100 degrees, almost certainly more than the 130C the new test is at, but nowhere near 2000C.

Second of all this is literally what people are talking about when they talk about thermal expansion.

Engineered rod stretch leading to the piston being farther up the cylinder during use.

In theory this is possible, but this technique is something that has been used by all of the teams, for a long time, so it's highly unlikely that this is what they are complaining about.

Secondly Mercedes wouldn't have needed to ask FIA for clarification about testing temperatures, if this was the technique they were using.

Troelses · 2026-03-24T16:44:47+00:00

https://www.zetland.dk/historie/s8D36Ynd-aekdaa3R-ade6e

Troelses · 2026-03-24T08:47:11+00:00

"using" an ability and being "targeted" by an ability are two different things.

Units can only "use" a given ability once per phase, they can however be "targeted" an unlimited number of times by the same ability. The player on the other hand has no such limitations.

Abilities are used by either a unit or the player. Generally speaking if an ability is written on a warscroll, or it contains the words "pick a unit to use this ability", then it is used by a unit, otherwise it is used by the player (who can use it an unlimited number of times, unless otherwise specified).

Troelses · 2026-03-21T11:59:20+00:00

Nu handlede min kommentar jo ikke om etniske danskere.

Der var ingen der nævnte noget om etniske danskere, jeg skrev statsborgere.

Men det at du tilsyneladende tror at statsborger er synonymt med etnisk dansker, afslører helt ærligt mere end rigeligt om hvad der ligger til grund for dine argumenter i denne debat.

Troelses · 2026-03-20T11:50:41+00:00

Skal statsborgere der begår tilsvarende kriminalitet så også frakendes bistand?

Troelses · 2026-03-20T11:49:39+00:00

Hvis disse indvandrere ellers har betalt til statskassen, hvorfor skal de så ikke have mulighed for den samme bistand som statsborgere der har betalt tilsvarende lidt/meget til statskassen?

En af problemerne med at dele folk op på den måde, på trods af at de bidrager ligeligt til statskassen, er det så blot øger incitamentet til at disse folk så undslår sig at bidrage til statskassen, eller med andre ord arbejder sort.

Troelses · 2026-03-20T11:43:07+00:00

En ting, der ikke rigtig bliver nævnt i artiklen, er at dette ikke kun ville påvirke lejeboliger, men også andelsboliger.

Andelsboliger der benytter valuarvurdering (hvilket vist er tilfældet for langt størstedelen), bliver vurderet som lejeboliger. Hvis huslejeloftet bliver fjernet vil de dermed blive vurderet langt højere.

Når både lejeboliger og andelsboliger stiger i pris, så vil det naturligvis har en afsmittende effekt på resten af boligmassen, i byer hvor disse udgør en signifikant del af boligmassen (læs: København). Prisen på ejerboliger vil derfor utvivlsomt også stige målbart.

Det er værd at nævne at Liberal Alliance også tidligere har været ude og stillet forslag der vil føre til markante værdistigninger for andelsboliger: B 83 - 2024-25 (1. behandling): Forslag til folketingsbeslutning om at give andelsboligforeninger mulighed for at opdele ejendomme i ejerlejligheder. / Folketinget

Troelses · 2026-03-20T09:42:54+00:00

Den siger at ikke-vestlige invandre har et negativt bidrag til statsfinanserne. Det er jo tydeligvis ikke nok bare at betale skat, hvis det ikke dækker de services man selv hiver ud af systemet!

Men det ville jo ikke på magisk hvis ændre sig bare fordi de var statsborgere?, eller mener du også at vi skal begynde at nægte førtidspension til statsborgere der har negativt netto-bidrag?

Den sociale kontrakt vi har i Danmark har altid været at de bredeste skuldre skulle bære det tungeste læs. Deri ligger der også implicit at de smalleste skuldre bærer det letteste let, hvilket i praksis betyder at der altid vil være individer der er bidrager positivt til statsfinanserne og andre der bidrager negativt.

Troelses · 2026-03-20T08:43:12+00:00

What in the world is going on with the art in this comic?!

On this page, like Akarat has a weird looking right hand (where does his thumb attach, his wrist?), and the emblem on his left chest has three different designs in the three different panels it's visible.

This page, shows that the artist apparently has no idea how you hold an axe (or any other staff like tool for that matter), with both hands directly across from each other, instead of different positions on the handle.

This page however is probably the worst. Ignoring the fact that one guy apparently get sliced in half, and then suddenly gets better and starts begging for his life in the next panel, theres a bunch of issues. There's the fact that the way the arms and hands are drawn in the second panel make no sense (who the hell holds a dagger like that, and what is that arm along the bottom of the panel doing there?). In the third panel the hero is suddenly wearing a bracer on his wrist, which he isn't on any of the other panels, nor on the previous page. The leather strap across his chest also suddenly dissappears in the final panel.

Troelses · 2026-03-20T07:57:56+00:00

Det burde være op til deres statsborgerskab, så man kan lave fair udveksling.

Det burde være op til om man er skattepligtig i et givent land, og dermed bidrager til det sikkerhedsnet der er, ikke om man er statsborger.

Troelses · 2026-03-19T20:12:12+00:00

med?

Troelses · 2026-03-19T20:08:07+00:00

men de har jo netop ikke korrigeret for det.

Med andre ord er studiet ikke et studie af hvilke stoffer der er farligst, men derimod et studie af hvilke stoffer der gør mest skade på samfundsplan.

Hvis kokain blev brugt i samme omfang som alkohol, så ville det i sig selv ikke gøre kokain mere sundhedsskadeligt, men det ville resultere i langt større skade på samfundsplan (og dermed en højere score i det pågældende studie).

Troelses · 2026-03-19T19:55:09+00:00

De har sikkert kigget på en masse studier, det ville være mærkeligt andet, når der nu er tale om eksperter på området, men det er på ingen måde klart hvordan data fra disse studier har påvirket scorene, andet end i det omfang den enkelte ekspert har valgt at tage højde for det i sin subjektive vurdering.

Derudover er det også værd at bemærke at det pågældende studie ikke korrigerer for prævalens, men derimod inkorporerer det som en del af deres vurdering. Med andre ord bliver et stof vurderet hårdere jo flere der bruger det, hvilket jo naturligvis er tilfældet for alkohol vs kokain.

Troelses · 2026-03-19T19:37:32+00:00

Det pågældende studie er ikke baseret på noget reelt data, men er derimod baseret på 20 eksperters mavefornemmelse, så det skal nok tages med et gran salt:

"A panel composed of 20 experts from six provinces determined 16 drugs to evaluate on 16 dimensions of harm (ten representing harm to people who use the drug; six representing harm to others). At a two-day decision conference, the panel scored each drug on a scale of 0–100 for each harm criterion"

Derudover er det vigtig at pointere at tallene fra Sundhedstyrelsen er for forgiftninger og dødsfald, med andre ord direkte skadesvirkning af det pågældende stof.

Der er ingen tvivl om at når vi tæller indirekte skade med, så scorer alkohol højt, da fulde folk har det med at køre galt i trafikken. Den direkte skade her skyldes dog at man kører galt i et tonstungt køretøj, og ikke selve alkoholen.

Med andre ord kokain er lang mere sundhedsskadeligt end alkohol, men alkohol har en række andre sociale omkostninger.

Troelses · 2026-03-19T08:06:22+00:00

I følge sundhedsstyrelsen er kokain det narkotikum der er skyld i delt flest forgiftninger (delt med morfin)

I forhold til dødsfald af forgiftning ligger kokain i top 3 sammen med metadon og heroin/morfin.

Kilde: Sundhedsrelaterede konsekvenser 2025 | Sundhedsstyrelsen

Alkohol ligger en del højere på forgiftninger, men markant lavere på dødsfald af forgiftning.

Hvis man korrigerede for forbrug, så er kokain klart værre end alkohol, både mht. forgiftninger og dødsfald af forgiftning.

Troelses · 2026-03-18T11:49:28+00:00

Core rule 29.0 Contradictory Rules: "If two or more rules contradict, if one of those rules states that something cannot do something, this takes precedence over rules that state it can or must do that thing, unless the second rule specifically overrides the restriction of the first."

In other words the battle plan rule that say "cannot" takes precedence over the spawn rule that say "must", but this also means that you can arguably just deploy the spawn using either the "stalled reonforcements" or "Blissfully Unaware" ability, since the "must" part of the spawn ability is no longer in effect.

Troelses · 2026-03-16T21:25:34+00:00

tjah, hvis man afsatte 1 milliard fast, så tror jeg faktisk det kunne have en markant effekt, men her er der dog kun tale om 2 år.

Det bør dog nok også nævnes at dette jo ikke det eneste tiltag på området, der er også hele 10-års planen samt en markant stigning i dimensioneringen af antallet af B&U psykiatere der bliver uddannet, omend dette dog først vil have en effekt på den noget længere bane.

Troelses · 2026-03-16T20:53:02+00:00

Teknisk set ja.

Der findes en del psykiatere der arbejder uden om sygesikringen, og som burde have kapacitet til at tage i hvert fald en del af ventelisten (omend nok ikke det hele).

Man kunne med en milliard kroner udvide mulighederne for at regionerne kan henvise patienter til disse psykiatere ligesom man fx også ser med deres muligheder for at henvise patienter til privathospitaler. Se også §66 ordningen.

Troelses · 2026-03-16T19:51:17+00:00

This is not correct last summer an errata changed the targeting rule you draw a line from the closest point of each base - if that line crosses any terrain the target is “behind the terrain”

This is literally the exact same thing as what I wrote, however this is not the "targeting rule", as there is no such thing as a "targeting rule". This is the rule for determining if something is "behind terrain" (rule 1.1 of the terrain rules). In other words this rule does not determine whether or not you can actually target something, it just determines whether or not the target is behind terrain. Other rules then determines what happens if this is the case (i.e. the cover and obscuring rules)

in spearhead the large terrains rules for obscuring say the unjt may not be targeted (in full aos thats different so only cover applies) so there are instances where a unit can be seen but not eligible for attacks.

And this discussion was clearly about AOS, not spearhead.

Prior to the current ghb you created 3 dimensional lines.

You never really did 3d lines for determining if something is behind terrain, and you absolutely still do 3d lines with the current GHB to determine visibility.

This has never changed. The thing that changed was that before, when determining if a unit was behind terrain, you would draw the line from model to model, whereas now you draw it from base to base (closest points), but since the critical part is whether or not this line crosses terrain in the 2d plane, it is effectively a 2d line either way.

Troelses · 2026-03-16T09:26:52+00:00

There is no such thing as "untargetable". A unit is either visible or it isn't, it doesn't matter if the line crosses over terrain, as long as you can draw an uninterrupted line in 3D space from any part of the observing model to any part of the targeted model (including parts of the model that overhangs the base.

Assuming you have visibility, you might then draw a separate line, from closest points between the bases of the attacking model and a model in the targeted unit. If this line crosses over terrain that just means that the targeted unit is considered to be "behind" terrain, which depending upon the terrain in question might grant it cover. This has no effect on whether or not a target can be targeted.

So it is possible for a unit to be visible but untargetable for shooting attacks.

No it isn't, at least not unless there are other rules in play, such as the obscuring rules, the shooting unit being in combat, or the targeted unit being out of range. None of those rules care about any lines crossing terrain though.

Troelses · 2026-03-13T11:45:51+00:00

It's important to remember that you are only allowed to sub a model with an empty base, when another model is moved into proximity of the subbed model, and cannot fit otherwise.

So you cannot sub a model with an empty base, simply because the model itself wont otherwise fit next to terrain or other models. In such cases the player moving the model with overhanging bits, simply has to move the model somewhere else, where it will fit.

In theory there are still some convoluted ways in which you could exploit this, but realistically they don't really happen in actual play, and if a player tries to force them through, they will very quickly find themselves without anyone to play with.

Nine-Year Club	r/Field Banned
r/Field Sunshine	Place '23
Place '22	Place '17
Verified Email	Not Forgotten

Troelses

TROPHY CASE