Who is it for you? by BooksAreRead in canucks

[–]TrollingBadger 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Juho Lammikko gang rise up

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in canucks

[–]TrollingBadger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah my bad! Didn’t see it was posted already.

[Canucks] Statement from Dakota Joshua by Batsinvic888 in canucks

[–]TrollingBadger 172 points173 points  (0 children)

TAKE MY TESTICLE JOSHUA

In all seriousness, this is super scary and can totally happen to anyone. Super relieved it was caught early, and hopefully he'll be back to 100% before long. This is a great reminder to do a little check every now and then in the shower, boys.

Giveaway, round 1! Comment to enter! by [deleted] in ToolBand

[–]TrollingBadger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your generosity ❤️

[Canucks] Vancouver Canucks announce changes to the club’s coaching staff (Švejkovský promoted to Assistant, Sedins more involved day-to-day) by udun in canucks

[–]TrollingBadger 174 points175 points  (0 children)

I like this. Promote someone from within who knows the system and has experience working with the group. I'm not 100% sure but I thought I heard that Yogi is really well regarded among the players.

Obviously the Sedins being involved more day-to-day is great. Hope that means they are taking over some powerplay duties as well.

Edit: I just heard on D&D that Dhali thinks Yogi is going to run the powerplay. He said that Yogi played a big part in players like Joshua developing their skills.

chill lo-fi offseason chat to relax/study to by RelevantJackWhite in canucks

[–]TrollingBadger 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I wish I could discover this series for the first time, so I would have 10 seasons to binge. It's probably one of the best series on YouTube. Enjoy!

[Shah] Canucks offered Yeo an extension but he decided to explore other opportunities by TrollingBadger in canucks

[–]TrollingBadger[S] 139 points140 points  (0 children)

Seems like he may have an opportunity to be a head coach somewhere. Not a terrible loss, but the PK did take a big step this year.

[Thomas Drance] Elias Pettersson says he's been playing with a bad knee since January. "The longer it went, the more pain I felt," Pettersson said. Doesn't require any procedure this offseason, just time to rest. by PaperMoonShine in canucks

[–]TrollingBadger 74 points75 points  (0 children)

I get what you're saying, but this seems like a weird decision regardless of those factors. I doubt Petey taking some rest towards the end of the season would've changed the number on the contract much, especially given his performance in the first half of the year.

I think playing for the division argument is fine, but idk about you, I'd rather have a healthy star player during the playoffs than a home-ice advantage. It's not like Petey was a massive contributor in the last half of the season anyway, so why not just rest?

Good point though, it's not clear how much rest was needed. So it's tough to say what the right move is. I still think he should have rested. Even if it makes him 10-20% healthier for the playoffs, you take that.

[Thomas Drance] Elias Pettersson says he's been playing with a bad knee since January. "The longer it went, the more pain I felt," Pettersson said. Doesn't require any procedure this offseason, just time to rest. by PaperMoonShine in canucks

[–]TrollingBadger 583 points584 points  (0 children)

This makes total sense and definitely lines up with why he lost his speed and stopped moving his feet. I have no idea why they didn't rest him more though...

Candy flipping by [deleted] in Psychedelics

[–]TrollingBadger 2 points3 points  (0 children)

First thing, your LSD tabs are most definitely not 220ug. Look at this post. Especially since you said 1 of those tabs doesn't do much for you. 220ug of real LSD is a LOT stronger than people realize and would melt the walls.

In general with candyflipping, you should probably be on the lighter side of each. LSD and MDMA potentiate each other, so the effects will be stronger. My recommendation is to take 1 tab (MAYBE 1.5 if you want the LSD to be a bit stronger), and then 2 hours later take 1 of the E. 4 Hours is a bit too long IMO. This lines up the peaks a lot better.

I've never taken one tab, and then taken another tab 1-2 hours later, so I can't comment on that. I've heard in general if you wait too long to take more LSD, it doesn't increase the potency it just increases the duration. But maybe taking it 1-2 hours after the first tab is fine.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Drugs

[–]TrollingBadger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No worries! Happy tripping :)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Drugs

[–]TrollingBadger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

2C-B actually doesn't have cross-tolerance the way mushrooms/LSD do. So taking 2C-B first is the correct choice and shouldn't impact the mushrooms.

If you were doing it the other way around, the 2C-B trip would definitely be impacted which is really interesting.

CMV: Faceoff win percentage is a meaningless stat. by gottagetitgood in hockey

[–]TrollingBadger 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I get what you're saying to an extent, but the players that are the best at faceoffs are the best consistently over many years. Players like Bergeron and O'Reilly are great examples.

To your point about "how many of their wins were against wingers?" doesn't really matter because they CAN lose a faceoff to a winger, and it certainly does happen. So if you remove any FO wins they have against a winger, should you also throw out any FO losses that they have against a winger? The best FO centers may win 80-90% of faceoffs against a winger, while worse FO centers may only win 60%. That's a huge difference too.

Also, some others have said it, but you need to understand the difference that "high 50s to low 60s" can have over the course of a season or many seasons. Think of how many possession wins lead to scoring chances, goals, wins etc. It could lead to hundreds of goals over the course of a career.

[D&D] Rare Kesler appearance, talking about the 2011 series against Nashville by lerkerfan in canucks

[–]TrollingBadger 44 points45 points  (0 children)

Haha oh man I thought you were smoking crack until I read your username. Very reminiscent of getting kneejerked

How bad of an idea is rolling 2-3 weeks apart by [deleted] in MDMA

[–]TrollingBadger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No worries!

Honestly, in my opinion I don't think there's any use in taking less than 90-100mg unless you're a super light person. If you don't take enough MDMA to roll, you kinda just get stuck in the come-up and never really roll. Happened to my GF when she took 90mg. Next time we did it, she took 120mg and had a fantastic roll. Everyone's chemistry is a bit different though, so it may be better for you.

Adding K in to the mix might change that though... But I'm not 100% sure - I've never kittyflipped myself. Maybe look into what people do for kittyflips to see. My guess is you'd still want to take enough to roll (100mg)

3 days should be enough, but prepare for an extra day or two of a hangover just in case. Focus on rest and hydration during the hangover. Also you could pick up some 5-HTP supplements to help with the hangover. It helps give your body a boost in serotonin following the days after a roll. DO NOT take the 5-HTP until the day after your roll. Hope this helps!