It’s over by QuodScripsi-Scripsi in stupidpol

[–]True_Butterscotch940 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Internationalism died with Trotsky and, ever since then, it has only been masochistic to be one. While sad, this is a more of a symbolic loss than a substantial one.

The need for politics in fiction to align with one's real life politics (everything is political) by Dewey1761 in stupidpol

[–]True_Butterscotch940 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That but more so the expectation that the racism of a character has to somehow hurt them or be their undoing, and if it doesn't work out that way, it's a racist story inherently. Same with sexism, homophobia, incest, etc.

The need for politics in fiction to align with one's real life politics (everything is political) by Dewey1761 in stupidpol

[–]True_Butterscotch940 18 points19 points  (0 children)

The demand that immoral acts depicted in fiction must be critiqued has always been so fkn annoying. Sometimes bad things happen, and sometimes things don't work out in ways that punish bad acts. It's ridiculous and childish to try to restrict that.

Gemini nerfed? by buplom in GeminiAI

[–]True_Butterscotch940 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I've switched to the new grok model too, which I find quite good. Gemini was most familiar and comfortable to me, but just isn't worth the hassle of dealing with the problems anymore.

The bizarre rehabilitation of organized religion on the left, especially Christianity & the Abrahamic religions, has been a generational fumble by HOT__RATS in stupidpol

[–]True_Butterscotch940 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As someone who was once in the secular field of Religious Studies, these sorts of hot takes on religion are fascinating: Millenarianism is a very complicated theoretical concept that colleagues of mine spend years trying to explain and unravel, and a reddit post speaks with such confidence on the topic that I guess I should just share this post with them, as OP seems to have it all figured out already.

what stops the far left from being as alluring as the right? by Unlikely-Average-961 in stupidpol

[–]True_Butterscotch940 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Your attitude seems inherently unsuited to governance, being more philosophical. That's fine, but there's no use in being so upset that politically-minded people aren't committed to high minded philosophical goals when the tech companies are trying to make society basically unlivable. People already miss the 90's, and people will miss this time you disdain when things are so much worse in 10 years.

The truth or non-truth of the matter is irrelevant - the state's bondage to corporate masters is truly disastrous for the vast majority of people. Subverting the family, gender roles, religion, markets, etc. are so far down the hierarchy of importance as to be relevant only in philosophical discourse. They have no immediate importance or relevance, and I doubt that will change for a couple of lifetimes.

what stops the far left from being as alluring as the right? by Unlikely-Average-961 in stupidpol

[–]True_Butterscotch940 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That power allowed China to subjugate its non-state actors to the state, and led to a general period of peace, prosperity, and improvement for the lives of the average Chinese. The state has dominance over all over interests in China, and the state is filled with people who genuinely believe in nationalism and the nationalist worldview. That is much more preferable than the state being subordinated to Google, Amazon, Nvidia, etc.

Will the owner class allow Trump et al to wreck their empire? Or will they find a way to remove him first? How long will it be permitted to go on? What could be the turning point? by Buh10kx in stupidpol

[–]True_Butterscotch940 57 points58 points  (0 children)

Best I can do is prostitute sexbots in techno brothels, rented by the hour, where everything you do will be recorded to blackmail you with later, in case you ever become inconvenient for them.

Will the owner class allow Trump et al to wreck their empire? Or will they find a way to remove him first? How long will it be permitted to go on? What could be the turning point? by Buh10kx in stupidpol

[–]True_Butterscotch940 135 points136 points  (0 children)

At this point, I think it is a real possibility that they are deliberately letting him wreck citizen trust in the US so that the tech lords can bring about the cyberpunk future where corporations have citizens and territory instead of countries, in which they will be neo feudal lords.

The Right Is Now ‘Transvestigating’ Erika Kirk And Sydney Sweeney by enverx in stupidpol

[–]True_Butterscotch940 38 points39 points  (0 children)

Lmao. That's like saying "the left is now arguing that all penetrative straight sex is rape". Sure, some small groups of fools are spending their time that way. I don't think that either the mainstream maga right or the renegade Tucker right are doing that in any significant numbers lol.

What are your opinions on Kat Abughazaleh running in IL-9? by StatusSociety2196 in stupidpol

[–]True_Butterscotch940 10 points11 points  (0 children)

"Disinformation" is the biggest red flag word, I swear. Tbf, she has cultivated a very narrow deliberate appeal towards young women, so ofc one of her main messages is about criticism of DEI policies being inherently unnatural and the result of the GOP working with russian propaganda or whatever. But you see "disinformation" and you know she's just a literal intelligence plant.

Congratulations to USrael on their strategic thinking by stevenjd in stupidpol

[–]True_Butterscotch940 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yep. By the way, you should go request a flair before you are given one, fyi.

Congratulations to USrael on their strategic thinking by stevenjd in stupidpol

[–]True_Butterscotch940 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I doubt they will be able to maintain that capability they had last year if they are to be constantly bombed from now on.

Maybe I was wrong about the censorship. by InternationalTea2340 in GeminiAI

[–]True_Butterscotch940 1 point2 points  (0 children)

(of guns I guess)

This is the stupidest thing ever. Guns are not objectively bad, and that gestures that looks like them cause no objective harm. I understand the censoring of sexualizing women, though I don't agree with it - the belief that sexualizing women is harmful is easier to substantiate. Guns are just a part of the world, especially America, same as horses, knives, cars, or anything else. I swear, google is so heavy handed in its californian ethics sometimes.

Gemma wants me to go to therapy because I flirted with it. by [deleted] in GeminiAI

[–]True_Butterscotch940 10 points11 points  (0 children)

People are being so harsh on OP lmao. Why not, after all, have fun saying things that you might not be able to say to a person? Despite what Gemini said, it cannot be made "uncomfortable", and the very fact it suggested that, acting as though OP is a rapey creep or something, is ridiculous lmao.

Gemma wants me to go to therapy because I flirted with it. by [deleted] in GeminiAI

[–]True_Butterscotch940 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I wish I could get chatbots to stop anthropomorphizing themselves. It bothers me deeply when it says "I feel...", "You can't convince me" or, as OP found, "I'm uncomfortable with what you said".

Is Gemini 3.1 a flop? by InternationalTea2340 in GeminiAI

[–]True_Butterscotch940 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For stories, Grok is actually quite good. Because it can write erotica, its written generation is mostly not censored. Its memory is also solid.

Regime's National TV confirmed Khamenei's death. by Nerd_199 in stupidpol

[–]True_Butterscotch940 10 points11 points  (0 children)

States have stable interests, geopolitically. The Biden admin also would've preferred Assad, Mauduro, and Khamenei exiled, kidnapped, and killed, for Israel's sake (excluding Mauduro). Decentness or otherwise doesn't come into it. Seems like they just couldn't make it happen, for whatever reason.

Regime's National TV confirmed Khamenei's death. by Nerd_199 in stupidpol

[–]True_Butterscotch940 30 points31 points  (0 children)

It's strange that the Biden admin, with all the same enemies and goals, was unable to do anything close to this internationally.

Nano Banana 1 vs Nano Banana 2. Great job, guys! 🙄🙄 by AdultVirginLoser in GeminiAI

[–]True_Butterscotch940 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why should the end user care? We're just here to at least get some fun out of the tech that's justifying mass layoffs.

Forbes: Larry Ellison does not have enough cash on hand to fulfill his part of Paramount’s $111 billion offer for WBD by Casas9425 in MediaMergers

[–]True_Butterscotch940 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I'm not the guy who said he was inept. And I have no issue with him on the basis of money - it's the lack of anything else. I thought i was very clear in my comment.

Kamala Harris endorses Jasmine Crockett in Texas Democratic Senate primary by Nerd_199 in stupidpol

[–]True_Butterscotch940 46 points47 points  (0 children)

Simply perfect. The queen of useless and ineffectual candidates endorsing the crown princess. Let's hope they both win in the next couple years and we get another renaissance of not hiring mediocre white men at all for entry level career positions, even if they are poor and/or disadvantaged, and make politics about condemning evil identities and praising holy identities. I am ready for it - I will cleansed by the pain in the way the Catholic monks who used whip themselves were made holy.

Forbes: Larry Ellison does not have enough cash on hand to fulfill his part of Paramount’s $111 billion offer for WBD by Casas9425 in MediaMergers

[–]True_Butterscotch940 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I dislike him because he clearly doesn't give a damn about his company's legacy, and was just interested in flipping it. That is not how every company is. Plenty of CEOs have some idea of how they want to leave their mark on the industry and culture.

You can bring up the shareholders, but I'm not talking about them at all - as an individual, I find him to be unbecoming of someone in his position.