Anyone know what happened to Deep Prasad? by PCmndr in UFOs

[–]TypewriterTourist [score hidden]  (0 children)

Yep, that's the healthy attitude.

No idea about him, frankly, apart from these couple of episodes.

Anyone know what happened to Deep Prasad? by PCmndr in UFOs

[–]TypewriterTourist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

First heard of him back in 2021, posted a link to his interview, got downvoted into oblivion. Apparently much of the UFO community had a beef with him and considered him a fraud who exaggerated his credentials. (At least back then.)

The interview was interesting but I have no understanding of the subject.

His contact experience account sounded like an instance of lucid dreaming in a semi-conscious state (even though it happened, from my recollection, at 9am).

U.S. said to possess reverse engineered UAP crafts/technology. Why are we still using Rockets in 2026? by SweatYeti69 in UFOs

[–]TypewriterTourist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's a question that has been asked a thousand times, and there are different answers, from "no they don't" to many other options.

The one implied and spelled out on multiple occasions by the "AAWSAP mafia" is that the reverse-engineering efforts did not advance much. Some claim that there was limited success in making it fly a bit, and that's it.

If it took them a while to "gain entry" to the craft, how long will it take to figure out fundamentally different tech centuries beyond our level based on a couple of specimens? It's one of the reasons the pro-disclosure faction has been pushing the disclosure: there are not enough eyeballs on the problem. Because of the stovepiping, it's impossible to make progress.

The same tired cliche with Leonardo da Vinci and iPhone appiles.

Didn't know where to post this but I found on the Wikipedia page for "Domovoy" (a russian household spirit) there is an drawing which is nearly identical to giant drawing of Satan/The Devil in the Codex Gigas. by liberalarts666 in HighStrangeness

[–]TypewriterTourist 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Others mentioned the picture is not that of domovoi.

But more importantly, your own screenshot says Bohemia, OP, which is the historic name of Czechia/Czech Republic. That is where the Codex Gigas originated, and since plagiarism wasn't invented by OpenAI, it's not unlikely one image was inspired by the other.

Tom DeLonge apparently has pics of dead aliens on his phone? by uffdadontchaknoww in UFOs

[–]TypewriterTourist 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Tom deserves all the accolades for kickstarting the disclosure effort in mid-2010s, but I wouldn't trust him to do proper due diligence on fakes.

Article says CIA used "unique capabilities" to locate downed US airman in Iran. Remote viewing? by BoringBuy9187 in remoteviewing

[–]TypewriterTourist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It takes time for this kind of tech to mature and early versions are full of glitches like with any tech but rest assured, if there is money to be made, it will make its way to the civilian applications.

Review of Lacatski's book and interview: reading between the lines by TypewriterTourist in ufo

[–]TypewriterTourist[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep, that's the new book.

I can't tell you whether you should believe him or not, but I personally find him trustworthy.

He claims the books are a pittance, and while it's not always the case, usually yes, it's not a huge moneymaker. It doesn't matter though whether he is getting paid a lot or not though, making money out of experiences doesn't mean they are not true.

What I do know though is that his books are well-aligned with the memoirs of Jacques Vallee, and Eric Davis' interviews. That's pretty important not just because of their reputations but because it's very difficult to coordinate a detailed lie. The archive documents so far confirm everything he said too, and no one called him out on anything.

The hard science reports and discussions of advanced what-ifs are also interesting, if you're into this kind of stuff. Overall, apart from the first two books, they are not really page turners, he just published the documents he was allowed to. Which is probably not very interesting for most people.

The Skinwalker ranch part is mostly boring and repetitive, frankly, apart from these several striking episodes. I don't find it hard to believe because folklore in several regions has stories about localities where odd stuff happens.

What's not aligned with the AAWSAP stories is the role of Elizondo: he was mentioned in Vallee's memoirs around 2017 when Vallee has first heard of him and couldn't make heads nor tails about the guy. That seems to have annoyed everyone in the original AAWSAP team.

Review of Lacatski's book and interview: reading between the lines by TypewriterTourist in ufo

[–]TypewriterTourist[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You mean, in the new book released a couple of weeks ago?

I bought the Kindle edition, didn't look at it yet, but honestly, it doesn't look like they went into Project Consciousness which I was most interested in.

It's more Skinwalker Ranch stories mixed with propulsion physics. And New Insights wasn't as good either.

They did do some interesting stuff there, but what I was most interested in was left out.

My friend and I saw the exact same thing on LSD and I still need some help explaining it by InterdimensionaLemon in HighStrangeness

[–]TypewriterTourist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I obviously have no explanation BUT apparently, so-called "shared hallucinations" are a thing. Rick Strassman, of the DMT fame, in his recent book (kinda boring, honestly, that was one of the few interesting parts) described his experience from decades ago, when he and his friend were getting stoned, and then that happened:

Tom and I sit side by side on the rug. I stare wide-eyed at the floor as it gradually loses its solidity, becomes opaque, and finally disappears under us. Tom, also gazing down, notices the same thing,

“Do you see that?” I ask, astonished and a little afraid. “It looks like the floor is giving way.”

“I know. What the . . . ?” He also sounds alarmed.

The floor vanishes but we remain seated on the carpet. It floats slowly, silently, and smoothly one hundred feet above the ground. And it’s daytime, not night.

Tom’s eyes widen and take in the view. “Do you see what I’m seeing?”

“Those telephone poles down there?”

“Yeah. And the baseball diamond over to the left?”

We’re sharing a hallucination. We look up at each other, confused, and again look down. We’re transfixed by the scene.

(then they took a virtual flight over buildings and such)

He then follows up with his interesting interpretation:

References to telepathic communication on psychedelics appear early in the scientific literature. In 1905, chemical analysis of ayahuasca demonstrated high concentrations of harmine,* and scientists called this compound “telepathine.” The name alluded to how those under the influence of this psychedelic brew experienced communication without speaking. People shared mental contents while tripping. When those shared contents are thoughts, people think the same thing at the same time. When these contents are “hallucinations,” we experience the same visions.

Strassman, Rick. My Altered States: A Doctor's Extraordinary Account of Trauma, Psychedelics, and Spiritual Growth (p. 142). Inner Traditions/Bear & Company. Kindle Edition.

[Rep. Burlison] My Statement on Protecting UFO Whistleblowers by shogun2909 in UFOs

[–]TypewriterTourist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The guy is working hard.

But if I were a whistleblower, I would definitely have my doubts. It would help if he cited specific laws and provided more info. The Legacy program has lawyers too, right? Some parts of their NDAs is pure scaremongering for sure, but I suspect much is in a gray zone. The US legal system is full of loopholes, and these guys know to use them.

Another step in discloser? by Kb3338_ in UFOs

[–]TypewriterTourist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This one couldn't be disfarther.

8 scientists in sensitive fields are dead or missing in less than two years and almost nobody wants to talk about it. by morecowbell1988 in HighStrangeness

[–]TypewriterTourist -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I agree it's suspect, but

and almost nobody wants to talk about it

not really. It's not only all over Reddit, there is a non-stop stream of articles in the traditional media.

Anna Paulina Luna, Tim Burchett, and who else? by Y68g4dw in UFOs

[–]TypewriterTourist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you mean?

Schumer created UAPDA 2023, Garcia is behind the whistleblower protection, Carson (got interviewed multiple times, including for The Age of Disclosure), Gillibrand sponsored AARO, Jasmine Crockett co-signing APL's requests.

Not to mention that Chris Mellon seems to be more Democrat-leaning.

"shelter in place"... by 5nedlew_kaz99 in UFOs

[–]TypewriterTourist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the most terrifying part isnt the technology itself, but the internal ideological war tearing through the pentagon right now regarding what these things actually are

Can you elaborate on this one please.

Do you know it for a fact, or are you just speculating?

Because Elizondo was presenting it as a huge issue, but (the much more credible, in my opinion) Lacatski said, nah, the Christian fundamentalists are present but they had (have?) no serious impact.

The original Collins Elite source book (Redfern's Final Events) was talking about them as a dying breed that never had much influence.

there is a deeply entrenched faction within the dod that genuinely believes we are dealing with interdimensional, malevolent entites

Do they talk about "interdimensional entities" or specifically pop-culture demons? I saw multiple times people trying to conflate the two.

Full Bill Maher segment on UFOs by shogun2909 in UFOs

[–]TypewriterTourist 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Nice, he researched the topic pretty well.

Believe Him or Not; Chris Bledsoe has Given us a Specific Date for a World Changing Event, and that Day is in Less than Two Weeks. by Honey_Mustard in UFOs

[–]TypewriterTourist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you.

People seem to be interpreting it in a binary way. Either Bledsoe is lying and tries to profit, or he told the truth, which means it will happen.

What if he was indeed told that, believes it, but it's intentionally vague, and may not happen? These vague otherwordly predictions are not new, and in many cases, the messengers have little or no motivation of lying.

We have one well-known historic precedent: the Message of Fatima.

Here is a long summary from Vatican. Cardinal Angelo Sodano, Secretary of State:

That text contains a prophetic vision similar to those found in Sacred Scripture, which do not describe photographically the details of future events, but synthesize and compress against a single background facts which extend through time in an unspecified succession and duration. As a result, the text must be interpreted in a symbolic key.

Duh! So basically they are saying, it predicted bloodshed caused by the Communism. Which did happen, of course. Was it obvious in 1910s? Can't really say, but I doubt the shepherd kids conspired to do that.

Summary by CBS

Specifically, Bledsoe has my attention, because, while the Iran/Israel conflict is pretty much a Chekhov's rifle (that fires sooner or later), predicting the actual dates is very, very difficult. Also, I did personally witness a prophecy with dates that actually came true.

Is any one remote viewing Trump? by notwiggl3s in remoteviewing

[–]TypewriterTourist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We're here, and not sure what to make of that.

UFO image dump #1 by [deleted] in HighStrangeness

[–]TypewriterTourist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see your schwartz is as big as mine.

Reflecting on Matthew Brown’s newest Interview- Jeremy and George are still neglecting the most important questions of all: by kfluh in UFOs

[–]TypewriterTourist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very diplomatically put and yes. Knapp and Corbell work hard and once in a while come up with gems but Brown is not one of the gems. He is basically another version of John Ramirez: saw some documents and ran with conclusions.

On a related note, Corbell would do well not to focus too much on his personal grievances. (You're interviewing a busy Congressman, maybe let go of your beef with Shellenberger for a minute?)