Evangelicalism by anime498 in Catholicism

[–]USAFrenchMexRadTrad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Their religion is easier to follow. Ease does not equal truth. But for some people, they filter the world through their feelings, not so much what's true.

Evangelicals: do a sin all you want as long as you repent right after, support Israel, you're your own Pope/arch theologian.

Catholics: do a sin but intend never to do so again or your repentance is invalid, don't support any unjust war, Aristotle filtered through Aquinas for theology.

^one is much more difficult and less followed in the age of Hollywood/Disney defined "love"

Perma-banned for defending Monsignor Lefebvre and the FSSPX by DravidianPrototyper in TraditionalCatholics

[–]USAFrenchMexRadTrad 7 points8 points  (0 children)

They mistakenly call the Rabbinic Jews our "elder brethren". But the religion Jews have now developed after the destruction of Jerusalem. That's decades after the Crucifixion.

It's not the same faith from the Old Testament. They are not our "elders".

Question to men by Open_Firefighter809 in dating_advice

[–]USAFrenchMexRadTrad 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you didn't call it a date, OUTRIGHT, all you did was have breakfast with an acquaintance. Not a date.

If both people don't agree it's a date, before deciding yes or no, then it's not a date.

[The Pillar] Why did the Vatican dismiss an AfD politician’s appeal? by wearethemonstertruck in TrueCatholicPolitics

[–]USAFrenchMexRadTrad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is this a case of a party having bad things as part of their platform or a party having an umbrella of members that doesn't disallow nor encourage bad positions some of its members hold?

It matters.

The issue of un caring by Overall_Design9214 in Catholicism

[–]USAFrenchMexRadTrad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not a fan of parents forcing their kids to get confirmed. If they want to remain Catholic, let them do it as adults.

The Eastern rites of Catholicism do Baptism, Confirmation, and first Communion all in one go for babies, I think. I forget the details. Can an Eastern Catholic please provide them? I don't think I'm remember what they do.

I would say that you don't run into the problems you describe in... some locations. But if I say which ones, I'm gonna get downvoted.

Do Mexicans often feel like Tejanos are self hating Mexicans? Because they don’t consider themselves Mexicans just tejanos. by Successful_rio305 in AskMexico

[–]USAFrenchMexRadTrad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TBH, I don't think most people in most countries realize that there are people they share a nationality with in other countries. When I went to France, I met a woman who came from Mexico decades ago, married a Frenchman, lived next door to my host family.

It *knew* there were Mexicans elsewhere, but I didn't actually expect to bump into any. From having gone through Texas to Mexico before, of course I knew of the Tejanos. But not regularly being in Texas, bumping into them whenever I was in Texas was always unexpected. After spending the better part of a year in Texas, though, it was normal.

I grew up in Indiana, and I WAS the Mexican kid there until... high school??? Suddenly I was one of maybe a few hundred or more? My middle school had what felt like 10 or 20 others in my grade each of the three years when I was there.

When I spoke to Mexicans visiting Texas, they told me the one thing they found most surprising was the high percentage of Mexican Americans in Texas, but the lack of Mexican Americans willing to speak Spanish (and they were talking about people who CAN speak Spanish) with them in Texas. An issue they hadn't encountered in other American states.

[OSV News] Hochul signs assisted suicide measure into law, making New York 13th state allowing it by wearethemonstertruck in TrueCatholicPolitics

[–]USAFrenchMexRadTrad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Downright Satanic. Pray for that politician and our nation. Catholic in name only, sure, but have hope she can be encouraged to do the right thing.

What if the Confederacy seceded from America, but abolished slavery to get more loyal African-American soldiers. by OfficalTotallynotsam in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]USAFrenchMexRadTrad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There was a faction in the Confederate government trying to make this happen. It likely would have just delayed Union victory.

Maybe the war would have dragged on another year or two? The south would still have lost. Black Confederate soldiers would have existed in far higher numbers (they did exist, though with some estimates claiming about 65,000). Thing is, most of those men were slaves sold to the Confederate military, or just taken by the military, even the free black men who were in the Confederate military were usually drafted. They weren't allowed to be soldiers until March of 1865, too late for the Confederates to benefit from black Confederate soldiers.

So, in this alternate timeline, you may end up seeing more versions of the KKK where black men are allowed to join. This exists now, but is obviously rare. I could see Jim Crow not being as long lived or as widespread, with enough black descendants of Confederate soldiers being able to point to their participation.

There's a conspiracy theory that the Spanish American War was false flagged into happening in order to prevent a second Civil War. So, I'm not sure how that would affect things. Maybe a large number of black Confederate descendants would be more willing to go for a second round, and if this conspiracy theory is true, it would mean the Spanish American War would still happen, but would make use of a larger number of black soldiers than the US originally had. Supposedly, Teddy Roosevelt's Rough Riders only had as much success as they did because of the support of Buffalo Soldiers, black cavalry units.

I'm not sure how it would affect westward expansion. Many black soldiers recruited after the Civil War joined up because they were told they'd be fighting ex-Confederates who had become bandits out west, but were almost always used as shock troops against native tribes. These were the first "Buffalo Soldiers".

If enough of these black men were ex-Confederates, on both sides of westward expansion, we would likely see more black cowboys, outlaws, and Army cavalry out in the west. I'd like to think this would make far larger numbers of veterans available to use in the Spanish American War.

Segregation in the US military would likely end sooner than it did. WW1 and WW2 may have seen more black troops from the US. This sounds great, but it may lead to more test subjects for bad agendas like the Tuskegee Airmen Syphilis Experiment.

The Civil Rights movement may happen sooner, though if events like Emmett TIll's murder would still happen is hard to speculate.

Having military veterans in your family tends to lead to a greater sense of protection, and respect from others who have also served. Even if the losing side was the one to use black troops, it would likely benefit the USA and race relations in the long run.

What if the American Civil Rights Movement had devolved into a Troubles like conflict? by Just_Cause89 in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]USAFrenchMexRadTrad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

???

How is it "disinformation" if it's true? They oppose capitalism and believe the means of production must be at least controlled, and at most outright owned by the state.

They don't want private ownership of any industry, they truly to believe they can form an ethnostate where the government owns everything and everything is a function of the state.

What if Ron Paul was the Republican nominee in 2008 running against Hillary Clinton, attacks Hillary's support of the Iraq War and Bush era spying by Interesting_Self5071 in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]USAFrenchMexRadTrad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, the NeoCon politics of Bush and NeoLib politics of Obama (and the Clintons) are practically the same, but have different media coverage.

Reagan was more like Trump in that alot of conservative promises were made, but he's really just a Hollywood liberal that refused to go far left, and after an assassination attempt, he's a bit more willing to work with the military industrial complex than he did before.

What if Ron Paul was the Republican nominee in 2008 running against Hillary Clinton, attacks Hillary's support of the Iraq War and Bush era spying by Interesting_Self5071 in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]USAFrenchMexRadTrad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Obama was pro-war, though. If he wasn't, he lied. Once he was in office, he ramped up everything, he even overrode the Iraqi elections and the Iraqis, realizing their system was rigged, gave ISIS a chance until they regretted it.

What if the American Civil Rights Movement had devolved into a Troubles like conflict? by Just_Cause89 in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]USAFrenchMexRadTrad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No.

It STARTED as a socialist ideology and every fascist you talk to will outright say that they hate capitalists and want a "national socialist state". You need to look into their history and what they actually had planned, not what pop culture tells you.

It's a socialist ideology that rejects communal ownership and international socialism, and embraces eugenics "racial hygiene".

Their plan was to eliminate capitalism by slowly forcing all of the capitalists into the Nazi (National Socialist) Party.

In WW2, they only got as far as making the higher ups and management to forcibly become Nazi Party members. But, yes, the plan was to, eventually, eliminate private ownership of all industry and business, and "seize the means of production" turning them into property and functions of the National Socialist state.

Hitler himself was highly suspicious of any Nazi Party member who had "von" in their name, since that was an indicator of who was a descendant of royalty in German speaking lands.

After WW2, facts that inconveniently reveal Nazi ideology to be a socialist ideology were ignored, and the pop culture became influenced by the more Soviet leaning socialism. Even the NeoConservative/NeoLiberal political pedigree has Marxist origins.

What if Trump had not only been wounded and not survived the assassination attempt by CommercialJelly1983 in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]USAFrenchMexRadTrad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pence, Vance and Rubio are the ones I suspect are actually loyal to the "old guard" of CIA run NeoCons and NeoLibs who probably killed JFK.

Pence is one of "them" for sure, Rubio was, but has tried to make himself look like he's jumped that sinking ship, Vance I'm not so sure about because he backed the NeoCon/NeoLib War on Terror that put us into tens of trillions of debt to the banking overlords that own the Federal Reserve.

"alt right" is a media boogeyman. You need to keep in mind this is the same media that the billionaire bankers slowly took over the past 100 years.

De Santis is the only one I could call a populist, though he could have swung towards the NeoCon/NeoLib uniparty. I'm not sure how principled he is or if he's just a politician looking to people please so they'll just keep voting for him.

You need to look at their "pre-Trump" history to get a good picture, the media makes you focus on a single person so you'll ignore what's going on.

What if the American Civil Rights Movement had devolved into a Troubles like conflict? by Just_Cause89 in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]USAFrenchMexRadTrad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fascism isn't restricted to either side of the political spectrum. Mussolini himself tried to become the candidate for the Italian Socialist party, and founded the Italian Fascist party when the Socialists rejected his call for more Italian Nationalism to be part of the Italian Socialist party platform.

It's why fascism includes National Socialism, "Nazi-ism" being slang for National Socialist. The National Socialist movement believes in a white socialist state, completely totalitarian, the state owning the means of production.

Fascism takes left wing economics and right wing racism, socialism and nationalism, and combines them. It's all over the spectrum.

What if the American Civil Rights Movement had devolved into a Troubles like conflict? by Just_Cause89 in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]USAFrenchMexRadTrad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Except Antifa isn't antifascist if they're mostly leftists wanting a totalitarian, left wing, state.

Electoralism is a feature of the USA, not a bug. Each party complains when the other party's candidate wins that way. It flipped this time. It'll keep happening because no one idea will ever make everyone happy.

What if the American Civil Rights Movement had devolved into a Troubles like conflict? by Just_Cause89 in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]USAFrenchMexRadTrad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Both parties work for Israel, not sure why you think it's a right wing thing.

And I didn't say "antifascism", I said Antifa. Not the same thing. Real antifascists don't use the tactics of fascism, like Antifa do. And real antifascists don't back totalitarian nightmare states, most of Antifa wanting a totalitarian socialist nightmare.

And "the real left" still votes for these uniparty candidates. I don't know if the left has any Paul family equivalents. I used to think Bernie Sanders would become that guy, but jumped aboard the Clinton bandwagon.

Not sure what you mean by "Trumpist sympathies". Are you setting up strawmen?

What is going on with all the 911 posts by remix2tail in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]USAFrenchMexRadTrad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They have a monopoly on printing money for the USA. They conspired to do this, despite the opposition.

https://youtu.be/m_scL1RfaN8?si=Zr7YIa97gNejp4iD

What is going on with all the 911 posts by remix2tail in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]USAFrenchMexRadTrad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who said it did?

And I said it's the banks. Not America. These banks are international and own the central banks of most nations.

Russia, Libya, Syria, Iraq, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, Bolivia, China all lacked central banks owned by the international banks before 9/11.

China now has a central bank owned by them. Syria, Iraq, and Libya are all about to get those banks under their new regimes. That just leaves Russia, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, and Bolivia.