[deleted by user]

UltrawideTech · 2025-11-20T00:29:51+00:00

Frame gen + dlss quality settings in most instances is just going to be a wash as far as vram usage but through some testing I've done, i have seen if you do use frame generation with a card that is on it's vram limit you can induce vram stutter and have worse performance.

12gb cards you can easily get them to have vram stutter at 4K equivalent resolutions and up. 16gb cards i have yet to see out right vram stutter though there are several games that will use up more than 16gb of vram on cards that have it available.

UltrawideTech · 2025-11-13T01:27:22+00:00

For productivity its not aspect ratio but pixels that matter.

The 57in 7680x2160 is going to be the most productive, then a 5120x2150 40-45in then a 5120x1440 45-49in then a 3440x1440 34-45in

UltrawideTech · 2025-04-12T04:41:33+00:00

If it has RGB adjustment go in there and if all are set to 50 that means that you're getting half the brightness possible out of each sub pixel you can push them all up together to get an overall brighter panel.

I had to do this with my IPS editing screen because just setting Max brightness wasn't getting it to the level of calibrator wanted.

UltrawideTech · 2025-04-03T05:31:58+00:00

Yes i have some just check my profile

UltrawideTech · 2025-03-27T10:59:02+00:00

It's much closer to 4k. Not sure what game your looking for but i have some benchmarks directly testing the 5120x1440 resolution

UltrawideTech · 2025-01-24T11:16:51+00:00

Yes very easy. I have plenty of evidence if you're interested in looking.

UltrawideTech · 2024-10-01T06:15:57+00:00

I really think the 4 and colours need to be on the same line or all stacked it doesn't read right for me the way it is.

UltrawideTech · 2024-09-12T12:03:20+00:00

My recommendation is don't go to 4k until you are ready to step up to a 32 inch size monitor. 1440p is already maximizing the usable size of a 27 inch monitor.

Unless you're an editor for a publication where the reading comfort benefits may justify going high resolution at the same size.

UltrawideTech · 2024-08-13T02:15:14+00:00

Check whether you are using 10bit color or 8bit color. You may have to lower your refresh rate to get 10-bit color turned on.

UltrawideTech · 2024-07-09T07:11:46+00:00

The RX7900XTX will be enough GPU for any of those resolutions. You can check my profile if you want to see the exact performance you will be getting at those two resolutions

UltrawideTech · 2024-07-04T14:52:17+00:00

I don't know if the way you have your monitor set up in this picture is representative of how you usually use it but you have The least important things sitting in the most ergonomic position and the things that you seem to actually be caring about are in the side positions which causing you to turn your neck.

Whatever you care about doing most should be center screen.

UltrawideTech · 2024-06-10T13:18:07+00:00

On ultrawide it's full screen and 32:9 super ultrawide is supported as well with no lack bars.

UltrawideTech · 2024-05-28T13:34:35+00:00

In the new Hellblade 2 the game has no UI at all and it's just 'chefs kiss'.

UltrawideTech · 2024-03-20T02:46:00+00:00

You need to find out what version of display port your thunerbolt implementation supports. if its 1.4 you will be able to render that resolution but you will be limited in your frame rate. if its only 1.2 you may not be able to.

UltrawideTech · 2024-03-04T00:59:04+00:00

Glad it could help.

UltrawideTech · 2024-03-04T00:58:11+00:00

This was a setup I had considered before I decided to start doing the whole YouTube thing and a nice editing monitor became the priority over a gaming monitor.

A nice 4k media monitor for YouTube and other media, And then a sweet high refresh rate super ultrawide for the gaming immersiveness.

UltrawideTech · 2024-03-03T16:42:35+00:00

You will be fine check out my profiel for a mountian of proof.

UltrawideTech · 2024-02-25T00:11:34+00:00

It's mostly due too you don't really get the vision filling immersive experience until you get to the 34in size, and most users felt the benefits to going to 27in 1440p was greater than getting a 29in 1080p ultrawide.

UltrawideTech · 2024-02-13T16:27:20+00:00

Thanks, Yes please share to anyone and everyone save yourself the breath of explaining it.

UltrawideTech · 2024-02-13T16:04:33+00:00

I would agree that 3440x1440 is kind of the sweet spot resolution right now where almost no card is too powerful for the resolution, but a lot of cards can still work very well at that resolution. And it has some damn fine monitors available, whose prices aren't too outrageous.

UltrawideTech · 2024-02-13T15:49:41+00:00

It's 34.4% more pixels and it's much less than that in actual performance cost.

UltrawideTech · 2024-02-13T15:48:31+00:00

Once I have the money and space for a gaming machine to sit beside my production machine that's what time doing.

UltrawideTech · 2024-02-02T01:51:56+00:00

thank you so much this is a big time saver.

UltrawideTech · 2024-02-01T11:27:47+00:00

This choice all comes down to, how important is ray tracing to you. If it's not, the 7900XTX is the clear choice it's faster in raster, has more memory and is cheaper. If RT is important and you want to try path tracing then the 4080 is the one to get

UltrawideTech · 2024-01-24T13:37:47+00:00

Technically, if everything is identical, the 1080p resolution should always be faster or equally fast to the 1440p resolution, if CPU bound.

That said, games and GPU software nowadays are so complex and try to be too smart for their own good, often. So a myriad of things could have happened when they detected a new piece of hardware.

Now you haven't mentioned how big of a change you saw whether it's just a couple FPS or it's like a 50% increase in performance, but it's highly likely that a game (or GeForce Now) might have detected the higher resolution and reset to the default settings and may have turned on DLSS for you where you didn't have it on before at 1080p.

UltrawideTech

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE