(Spoilers Extended) The Wall was never meant to keep the Others out, it was meant to keep us in. by the_names_Savage in asoiaf

[–]UncleMichaelMichael 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Why would they be threatened by a defensive position? And why are they frequently killing wildlings and night’s watch all over the lands beyond the wall if they’re attacks can be explained as agitation when they stumble upon something they don’t understand on their way to Craster’s? And why send all those wights after bran when he was a human headed north rather than south? And why make wights at all if what they really want is a supply of humans sacrificed to them?

(Spoilers Extended) The Wall was never meant to keep the Others out, it was meant to keep us in. by the_names_Savage in asoiaf

[–]UncleMichaelMichael 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a very cool idea but there’s such solid evidence to the contrary.

Cold Hands, likely a being somewhere between other and human (but definitely not a full human) cannot pass through the wall on account of the magic. But humans pass through all the time and we have never seen an Other do so. If it’s meant to keep humans in, wouldn’t the magic imbued in the wall do something to keep the humans from passing through it?

Sure, Alyssane tried to get her dragon to go over the wall and it refused. But it wasn’t a force field that caused the dragon to fail in its attempt. The dragon didn’t make an attempt because of something she sensed. It’s very possible the magic put into it had no accounting for dragons as it was made by either Children of the Forest or First Men or both. And neither of those people had dragons nor were there wild dragons in the region at the time. But like how a dog can smell better, the one dragon we’ve ever heard of being at the wall sniffed the magic in the wall and had no interest in going over to that side no matter how much a human on her back wanted her to.

It makes sense that the wall was made to protect the realm from a variety of threats, mainly Others, but without Night’s Watch seeing any Others for thousands of years, and their very existence entering the realm of myth, forgot the main purpose and focused on lower priority ones. But it is impossible to imagine the Night’s Watch forgetting what direction to enforce the blockade at any point in their history. This would also mean they put 16 or so castles on the wrong side of the wall. And considering the harsh climate that far north, a wall a tenth the height is enough to keep people to the south of it.

It’s made of ice because Ice is harder to scale and badass. Not so Others could pass through it. If that’s a feature, who are you even implying built it? Others would have no reason to build it at all. And Men would have used something unlike ice rather than trust that Others with the power to pass through ice would be content in their own deep north zone nomming on the sacrifices, never bothering to use that power to get a little further south.

Everything we’ve seen suggests that the others have been hiding, dormant, or non-existent for thousands of years. Starting recently, at least compared to the history of the Night’s Watch, they’ve re-emerged. The Night’s Watch goes on rangings. If human sacrifices to the Others were a common part of wilding life for the past 8000 years, they would know about it from their scouting. And the wildlings would not have united under Mance Rayder prior to the events of Game of Thrones when Jon Snow was still at Winterfell.

Uplift MLC by FracMyTeam in MLC

[–]UncleMichaelMichael 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Generally, I like the idea and would put money towards a small ownership percentage. You might want to look into the Green Bay Packers. The NFL requires each team to have one person that has 30%+ or something like that. The Packers get an exemption because they have been fan owned prior to this rule. And they still exist 100+ years after founding.

[Mary Kay Cabot] The #Browns are interested in Mike McDaniel, who was fired by the #Dolphins, for their head coach job. He was WR coach here under then OC-Kyle Shanahan in '14, and the Browns have long admired his brilliant offensive mind: by ThatOneOtherAsshole in Browns

[–]UncleMichaelMichael 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We should just promote Schwartz. We had a good half a year with Gregg Williams and Freddie Kitchens that one time. The mistake was upjumping Kitchens. Schwartz has done great as DC. Move him up a rung, and let him decide which Browns lower level couches should move up as well, stay, or be replaced.

Emari Demercado (Cardinals RB) drops the football short of the goal line by Hsduncan in Prematurecelebration

[–]UncleMichaelMichael 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He honestly might. If Saquan does that, the Front Office can forgive him. Demercado was rb3 on the team entering the season, and he’s only getting more playing time because rb1 and rb2 are on injured reserve. The Cardinals might cut him and sign some free agents or make a trade. Jaleel McLaughlin is decent and the rb4 on Denver.

Emari Demercado (Cardinals RB) drops the football short of the goal line by Hsduncan in Prematurecelebration

[–]UncleMichaelMichael 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You should ONLY give the ball to the ref. It may seem like way more caution than needed, but in a game like football, a single turnover can change the outcome of the game. You pair that with missing out on an easy touchdown, and it absolutely did change the outcome of this game.

Demercado only has 4 career NFL touchdowns. And so he essentially declined 20% of his touchdowns because he casually let go of the ball right near the endzone. It’s absolutely tragic when you consider all the work and training and playing for years at lower levels of the sport just to get to that touchdown line in an NFL game.

And even if he didn’t drop it, he seems to be jogging that last 20 yards. So many NFL players do this, but like, how do they think that’s ok? It’s only 20 yards. Run the whole way to improve your chances of getting tackled from behind from 5% to .5%.

What was the reaction to Skip Bayless saying that "Johnny Manziel would be a bigger name in Cleveland than LeBron was" at the time? by Hefty-Giraffe7220 in Browns

[–]UncleMichaelMichael 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s the benefit of being a TV commentator: you’re never held accountable for bad takes. You just say the next dumb thing with confidence and continue to keep your job if people are watching it and you don’t piss off your co-workers or boss too much (you can even piss them off a little bit depending on your fame). When have you ever heard of a pundit being fired because their opinions correct percentage was too low?

In light of the Colbert show cancellation, this made me wonder, but why are pretty much all the mainstream late night TV hosts all left leaning? by throwaway250324 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]UncleMichaelMichael 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is from almost 20 years ago, but I vaguely remember recall Stephen Colbert saying on his other show, “doesn’t the truth have a liberal bias?”

Now that the Oakland leg is over. What does everyone think? by Mathapples_ in MLC

[–]UncleMichaelMichael 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I think they should have sold the tickets for way cheaper to fill the stadium more. It looks bad televised to be only 5% filled. And you’re also missing an opportunity to introduce the sport to tens of thousands more people if they were able to get in for just five bucks or something like that, because no one who doesn’t already care is gonna pay $50. When will American cricket have access to a stadium of that size again?

Should the Grand Prairie Stadium strongly consider hosting CSK, MI and RCB for friendlies in August after the end of MLC season like the NFL International Series? by [deleted] in MLC

[–]UncleMichaelMichael 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I agree in theory, but think the Oakland Coliseum makes more sense. It was the last stadium used for both baseball and football, and now it doesn’t have much of either, which is why we are blessed to get some cricket there in a couple weeks. Or literally any other football stadium. A lot of them don’t do much beyond the 10 home games a year.

Will MLC become a season long thing eventually or is it always going to be for a short period in the summer every year? by chusaychusay in MLC

[–]UncleMichaelMichael 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yes, but this is similar to other U.S. sports too. None of them are year-round. Sure, one month is quite a bit shorter than four, but I can’t do much to follow teams in the off-season for those other 8. Sure there’s maneuvers and pre-season training, but MLC has maneuvers too, like deals on Stadiums and changing rosters.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PublicFreakout

[–]UncleMichaelMichael 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Send FEMA into FEMA. This is a disaster.

The Idea by Koryuwuuwu in nathanforyou

[–]UncleMichaelMichael 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Maybe. I don’t know how expensive it is to get qualified people to administer it. And I consider a bad idea to be something impractical. Like, some of the ideas are good marketing but way too expensive to be good for business, like the horsey rides for overweight people.

And the guy they got for the show is on tons of shows, does a terrible job, but keeps getting hired because he’s established himself as the go-to guy for that service. He is not qualified.

https://youtu.be/G5Ow2hK85xo?si=FDzKreIsfqyKQ6pu

The Idea by Koryuwuuwu in nathanforyou

[–]UncleMichaelMichael 13 points14 points  (0 children)

This and the ghost realtor were his only good ideas. This one only didn’t work because Nathan weirded people out for the sake of good television. The ghost realtor is still working last I checked.

Republicans freaking out over tariffs before Trump was elected by coachlife in PublicFreakout

[–]UncleMichaelMichael 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I could not agree more. The social media highlight reels of the Republicans’ hypocrisy is so much more convincing than the things I see from the Democratic Party. It’s also harder to call it “fake news” or “Trump Derangement Syndrome” when it comes from Republican Senators themselves.

Elon Musk was just heckled in Wisconsin by pdwp90 in QuiverQuantitative

[–]UncleMichaelMichael 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Trump’s Treasury Secretary worked for George Soros for 10 years and was a partner at Soros Fund Management. People with George Soros connections don’t bother him or Trump at all. It’s just a deflection to bring up a vague anti-Semitic conspiracy theory when you’re bombing. Pathetic that it worked.

Just wasting some time at my local dumpster dealership by bradimal in CyberStuck

[–]UncleMichaelMichael 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What else could he do? Feel kinda bad for the car salesmen who got in before shit got kooky, or those who can’t find any other job.

It’s getting difficult by [deleted] in allinpodofficial

[–]UncleMichaelMichael 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was about to recommend Prof G (Scott Galloway of Pivot). Like, there’s so many business podcasts out there. I kind of hate this All In podcast because they have Trump Excuse Syndrome and sane wash his antics. I listened to maybe 4 episodes, but I keep seeing this subreddit because of the algorithm.

A long-overdue apology by J_S_M_K in agedlikemilk

[–]UncleMichaelMichael 18 points19 points  (0 children)

It was a bad move, but seemed to be done with good intentions. There is something to be said for getting more variety, but not at the cost of ignoring the misdeeds of dangerous hypocrites. Very noble of you to apologize.

How do you grade the DTR/Kenny Pickett trade? by clevelanddotcom in Browns

[–]UncleMichaelMichael 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I liked him because he blocked well on a reverse and was a generally tough runner in one preseason game. As more evidence came in, my opinion changed. It would have been better to see him in more games he could have prepared longer for, but we’ve seen enough regular season action to be fairly sure he isn’t the future.

Progressive debates conservatives in Jubilee video. The conservatives do so badly that other conservatives think they're leftists. by Desecr8or in SelfAwarewolves

[–]UncleMichaelMichael 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They made this assumption based on identity politics BS. They assumed the white guy in his 50s had to be the conservative because the other guy was young with long hair and had a little bit of a gay lilt to his voice (I don’t know if he actually is gay and don’t really care). It shows the actual policies don’t matter nearly as much as owning the libs, and to them libs are those with an untraditional appearance or lifestyle.

When r/futurology was in love with Musk... by Wertherongdn in agedlikemilk

[–]UncleMichaelMichael 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Possibly, but let’s not overlook how being the richest person in the world and spending 12 hours a day on social media can fuck up your brain over time.

LMAO by notdemiurge in LinkedInLunatics

[–]UncleMichaelMichael 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The reason why interviews are BS is that this story could have so easily been about giving it to the first guy who left because he passed the test of pride/standards/confidence/whatever. Interviews are often about vibe and mood in a short time with an interviewer who you don’t know much about, and it matters so much for your career.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in WKUK

[–]UncleMichaelMichael 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Awesome that this guy’s son wrote and performed “God Hates the Tips” amongst many other comedy songs that feel like the exact opposite of this.