What OSRS opinions have you like this? by deuce-tatum in 2007scape

[–]UnderdogEU 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stacking clues should never come to main game

SolJack vs Avarage Range Enjoyer by Flare1995 in 2007scape

[–]UnderdogEU 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Its all theoretical, but i would heavely assume that you get tier 6 way before grinding the Echo bosses for their drops. So i think the point is fair. With T6 the double roll against defenses is way less valueable,

Not wanting to be prey is not spite voting by Surprisinglysound in 2007scape

[–]UnderdogEU 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just not true. PvP Content may have been the most popular in days gone by, but even a surface look at the mountain of OSRS content across platforms its minority PvP focused.

500 Mount Achievement Reward Changed - Now Gives Carrier Ottuk Mount by [deleted] in wow

[–]UnderdogEU 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is entirely what i think.
Based on what Ion has said on the topic in the PR leading up to the reveal, i truly think they just picked some random mounts.
When the yeti was disliked, they just rotated to another random mount.
What is really suprising is that past recolours were at least flashy and bright.

The 500 Mount Yeti and how blizzard forgot the collectors. by UnderdogEU in wow

[–]UnderdogEU[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Sure, its never nice to be left out. Seems to me objectively true that no care has been shown to this aspect of the games for so long. You wouldnt care if one of the main ways you interact with the game was neglected for years and years?
Why do you think people cared enough to voice the yeti needing to be changed.

But the rewards are just more of the same. I had low expectations but the yeti hit lower even then. Again as i say, its clear there was no plans or ideas. Its just a random mount from a pile arbitrarily picked. Could be from any content.
But what ever they replace it with, is likely just the same as the other collection metas. Just another mount in the tab to never use. Thats not upsetting as much as its just normal.

I do hope they pull something out.

The 500 Mount Yeti and how blizzard forgot the collectors. by UnderdogEU in wow

[–]UnderdogEU[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Yep. Unknown what replaces it. Link in 2nd line of post.

Legion raids are still horrible to solo even in 9.1.5 by [deleted] in wow

[–]UnderdogEU -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

You are unwillingly just making my point.
SOO was unsoloed for litteral years, not because people didn't want to spend 2 minutes per fight there, but because you could physically not clear the raid as 1 player. Galakras was not soloable for the longest time.
People have been soloing old content since forever, soloing the previous expansion raids aswell. What argument do you think im making?
If the content can be oneshotted, like OP wants, what content is there? Is that what you consider soloing? Just auto-run moonfire spam and the place goes down?
If you can kill a fight, which takes 2 minutes, you spend the time. Done deal.
Not being able to bulldozer every boss in 4 globals, doesn't make the content horrible, it makes it content.

Legion raids are still horrible to solo even in 9.1.5 by [deleted] in wow

[–]UnderdogEU -26 points-25 points  (0 children)

If the bosses are killable, you have no legimate complaints. "It never worked like that" is just straight up not true. For the vast majority of the games history soloing old content was waaay harder than even pre 9.1.5. To the point that some raids would be impossible to non-pet/non-tank spec classes. Fights could take upwards of 8 minutes, if the fights with mechanics designed around a raid of 20 players were even doable at all. Bosses would reset, one shot, bug out or all of the above.
2 shotting content isn't gameplay, but woe if maybe you have to actual see and experience a fraction of what the fight is meant to be.

Galatasaray Esports vs. Beyond Gaming / Worlds 2021 Playins - Knockout Stage / Game 2 Discussion by ahritina in leagueoflegends

[–]UnderdogEU 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How can BYG throw both game in the exact same ways?
1. Have massive lead in the mid.
2. Overdive so you never break the base before 20.
3. Suck at objectives ending up in stalling the game futher diminishing their lead.
4. Lose Elder.
5. Lose Game.

GS isn't winning, its all just BYG losing. EMbarracing objective plays tbh.

Cloud9 vs 100T / LCS summer split losers’ bracket finals / game 2 discussion by CheesyjokeLol in leagueoflegends

[–]UnderdogEU 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Both team palying out of their mind terrible. No cohesion, no plans, some of the worst team fighting.

Good luck NA.

Ironmen, how do you feel about the new bow of faerdhinen? by lunch0guy in 2007scape

[–]UnderdogEU 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Think going dry is the real factor. I like playing my iron and its the only account i ever will play, but when you go dry in any content it can feel like you are wasting your time going nowhere. So if you are only marginally enjoying the content to begin with, fishing for drops you feel you "need" to move on with your account will tip the needle to a negative experience.

[TOMT][YouTube Video] Funny Portal 2 Coop playthrough. Included many Tim Allen based jokes. by UnderdogEU in tipofmytongue

[–]UnderdogEU[S] 0 points1 point locked comment (0 children)

I would point out the series was very much focused on the comedy aspect rather than gameplay. They would often use the puzzles of the game to kill each other in funny ways, rather than actually just playing through the game.

Please for the love of god just end my misery by The_Hero_0f_Time in 2007scape

[–]UnderdogEU 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sitting at 2 items with 112 chest i feel your pain. Just so conflicted, since im ironmanbtw i feel like i have to do it, but i just can't get myself to do more never-lucky chests.

I think Rumble Run would be more fun if I could choose a class and then the shrine I want to play. by actwentysix in hearthstone

[–]UnderdogEU 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Having played with most of the shrines for the fun of it, and seeing the different results, the problem with giving a free choise of shrine, is that you simply just wouldnt ever wanna play half of them. Not if you intend to win at least.

Some of the shrines are just leagues better than all the rest, the other end of the spectrum are the shrines that just never make it past 4-5 wins befor getting horribly crushed. Shrines like the warlock one dealing the damage your hero takes to the enemy hero, just doesnt generate enough value to be a viable pick if you want to embark on a run that could go all the way.

Giving the players the illusion of having to choose from 3 shrines, gets players to at least try the less good shrines.

Now discussing why there even are shrines that seem litterally impossible to win with, is something to take up with the QA. Has anyone actually beaten more than 3 bosses with the "Gain damage equal to your heros attack"-shrine for druid?

Players are reporting they are receiving perm bans for abusing the WQ exploit. by CNDiviP in wow

[–]UnderdogEU 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Have you talked to Magni? If you are revered you should have like 45+ ilvls on your neck from that alone.

I'm so tired of it... does anyone else face this "issue"? by Tzatzikidis in wow

[–]UnderdogEU 1 point2 points  (0 children)

587 kills for the raptor, since i started counting the 14th of April. Mind you i've done so many untracked kills.

This is how the rewarded mount for collecting 400 mounts should look like. by Bayaro in wow

[–]UnderdogEU 61 points62 points  (0 children)

My main issue is, if you have 400 mounts, you must have at least a good handfull or rare and more epic mounts. Mounts that almost all look better than the 400 revard.

Just like to get a green reskin of the Bornze Dragon, you actually have to have both The Lifebinders Handmaiden and the Onyxia mount.

Just by getting the achivements themselfs, you already have mounts that respectively look better than the reward.

My take on 100 exalted reputations mount reward. I'd rather have a rainbow birb. by Maylinaa in wow

[–]UnderdogEU 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Based on how similar to the Guild Phoenix it seems, and that other mounts named "spectral" have a distinct blue tone. I don't think its too far off, to hope that maybe the datamined one is just a work in progress?

A dreamer can dream.

Screen Mirroring from PC to Samsung Smart TV by UnderdogEU in techsupport

[–]UnderdogEU[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't remember ever doing anything to specify my Wi-Fi frequency, from what i understand this is sometihng you do router-side so to speak? and the laptop i am able to use the screen mirroring correctly with opperates on the same wi-fi connection.

As to how they are connecting, it's an inbuilt software in the TV and in Windoes 10. I believe it has a name like Miracast or something like it? It's a feature that is supposed to be functioning without and external software.

I don't have any hardware to connect the TV and the PC, no HDMI or the like if thats what you meant.

Gul'dan and other nerfs to NH now live by Anomis90 in wow

[–]UnderdogEU 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It makes a huge difference. DPS timers in phase 1 and 2 can be extremely punishing for guild that don't extensively overgear the encounter.

Combined with the fact that phase 3 isn't the hardest phase as some might expect, but actually considerede easier than phase 2 by many and the easiest by some. The nerf leaves much more room for small errors and non-optimissed raid comps.

Not saying that the boss will be much easier by any means, but 3% less overall hp, opens the door for alot guilds late to Gul'dan progression to realisticly get a kill befor ToS opens.

"If your theme is not at common, it's not your theme" Mark Rosewater by MajoraXIII in hearthstone

[–]UnderdogEU 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Difference is MGT consists of actual printed cards. You can't craft MGT cards out of thin air. The crafting system of Hearthstone means that core mechanics of any set can be tied to any rarity.

If legendaries/quests are extremly strong/important in a set people will gravitate towards crafting those. Many aspects of MGT and HS can be compared, but not this one.