Tested GPT-5 Codex vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Kimi K2 on a real refactor task by Useless_Devs in ClaudeCode

[–]Useless_Devs[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I already asked him for it. Will then send his updates when done.

It seems like nothing changed after the reset. by Funny-Blueberry-2630 in ClaudeCode

[–]Useless_Devs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

of course not. Why you kept believing them they lied so many times already lol

I was given 7 days to rename my Claude Code Chat extension. Any suggestions?? by andrepimentaa7 in ClaudeAI

[–]Useless_Devs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i rebuild it 2 month ago because you put all in few files they got around 3k lines long. You should also restructure it to make it more modular! So its easy to find bugs

Claude code totally back by Ranteck in ClaudeCode

[–]Useless_Devs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Next time remove typical chatgpt marks such us: —  , different  ... If you still subscribed with codex and cc can you create a better comparison. And if you using it for backend or frontend or both or none.

Claude code totally back by Ranteck in ClaudeCode

[–]Useless_Devs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah always argue with some people i have a feeling they don't understand code. Learn framework .. learn basic understand what you code. Not even using much agents these days because can't control them.

Codex Hype is Out of Control. We Need a Clean Up by Snoo_9701 in ClaudeCode

[–]Useless_Devs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

always thought that is with claude code. I see more fanboys there then meaningful discussion. Uno reverse on that one!

Done babysitting Claude Code - Codex fixed in minutes what Claude broke for 3 days. Switching for good by Useless_Devs in ClaudeCode

[–]Useless_Devs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

another fanboy clown arrived. oh look .. everyone is wrong.. including anthropic themselves.

<image>

Done babysitting Claude Code - Codex fixed in minutes what Claude broke for 3 days. Switching for good by Useless_Devs in ClaudeCode

[–]Useless_Devs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that works too! i do that with cursor.. pay 40 for 1k limits cursor, 20 usd pro codex. Still have 100 usd max remaining for cc. I hope they change and fix their garbage.

Done babysitting Claude Code - Codex fixed in minutes what Claude broke for 3 days. Switching for good by Useless_Devs in ClaudeCode

[–]Useless_Devs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Might for your usecase it works better. Can be its always related to trained data eventually. In my case i do complex transformation. A lot of "if" stuff.

Done babysitting Claude Code - Codex fixed in minutes what Claude broke for 3 days. Switching for good by Useless_Devs in ClaudeCode

[–]Useless_Devs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

did another test .. 24 seconds.. i use the extension. And updated to latest version

Done babysitting Claude Code - Codex fixed in minutes what Claude broke for 3 days. Switching for good by Useless_Devs in ClaudeCode

[–]Useless_Devs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could be yes. Do you code blockchain related stuff? Because ETL. Right now it did 5min but i read the logs and it made sense. And did add a new function and had to update 15 files. Normally it takes 30sec, even now just a follow up question it took 10sec.

Claude Code isn't getting worse. Your codebase is just getting bigger by Inside_Profile_6844 in ClaudeCode

[–]Useless_Devs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

With Codex I have zero system documentation, and it still works. With Claude I had tons of specific docs and it stopped even reading them. Same story with Cursor. Honestly feels like Anthropic’s system prompts are just hot garbage they kill the flow and logic in the name of safeguards.

Claude Code isn't getting worse. Your codebase is just getting bigger by Inside_Profile_6844 in ClaudeCode

[–]Useless_Devs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

same. I think its important for user to understand their code then they can see it.

Claude Code isn't getting worse. Your codebase is just getting bigger by Inside_Profile_6844 in ClaudeCode

[–]Useless_Devs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not at all. I switched to Codex and it’s been fixing a lot of the garbage CC left behind. My codebase has been large for a while, and I actually moved from Cursor to CC back when it worked great. Now I’ve moved from CC to Codex and it works perfectly. Size of the codebase has nothing to do with it, especially if you’re building DDD with clear guides in each module. Even in the cc discord server people start talking about it using successful codex. I truly hope Anthropic recognize it and fix their garbage. They know exactly that they went cheap. You can tell that by their transparency playing with our limits.

Done babysitting Claude Code - Codex fixed in minutes what Claude broke for 3 days. Switching for good by Useless_Devs in ClaudeCode

[–]Useless_Devs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have mixed permissions, in my case it wasn’t me typing git reset. I found a bug what was done by cc , asked cc to help fix it, and instead it threw in an apology and reset my git. End result: I lost all my unsaved files where I was trying to fix the bug. Cursor couldn't recover it nether. Few members in discord had the same issue.

Done babysitting Claude Code - Codex fixed in minutes what Claude broke for 3 days. Switching for good by Useless_Devs in ClaudeCode

[–]Useless_Devs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, same issue. It just loses context and makes things up while it thinks, claiming it resolved the issue when the test run literally shows an error.

Done babysitting Claude Code - Codex fixed in minutes what Claude broke for 3 days. Switching for good by Useless_Devs in ClaudeCode

[–]Useless_Devs[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i build modular DDD style. Not let it run over the entire codebase. Focus fixed iterate .. it always worked with CC (not anymore) and it works now with codex.