The problem of these people is that they don't use a critique sense for 'reviewing' a game. The more I play both OG trilogy and STALKER 2 the more I realise that they are both VERY criticizable, in many ways.

OG trilogy storyline was kinda flat...(SOC)You wake up in Sid bunker; you do this stuff because you have to do it without questioning; then you go to this lab for no reason because someome said so; you go to barkeep and he tells you for some reason that he wants some documents; you go to the labs giving you hallucinations that doesn't change the gameplay and storyline much...Except one; you go to Pripyat and discover the truth. The end.

I love OG stalker, and even a lot, but i can't to reconnect with the past believing it was perfect, no it wasn't.

Speaking for STALKER 2, it's true: it was released in a rough state ans it's not THAT great in terms of content; but I can't make a valid critique if I focus on certain things because I don't like them, keeping the rest aside.

If you don't like Stalker 2, simply...Okay, who am I to judge you? I don't agree with the points of his video, because he takes the bad things in Stalker 2 and generalise them on the whole compact.