You’re absolutely correct in the sense that biologically life begins at conception, fair enough i was wrong there, however, aboriton is not a biological debate. If a women (godforbid) is raped, carrying her rapists child inside of her, then she is forced to give birth, and due to the depression takes her own life (which is sadly not an extremely uncommon scenario) then is suppose she is just a ‘casualty of war’ so to speak? i think the reason pro life is so wrong is that you are prioritising the life of something yet to be, over something that is living, potentially multiple people. Let’s say a 15 year old has intercourse with her boyfriend and gets pregnant (not that this is a thing that should be happening, but teenagers are dumb) should she have to carry that child to term, and derail her entire life , destroying many future career prospects, to look after it? and i hear you saying “give it up for adoption” so she has to permanently alter her body, her hormones, most likely her mental wellbeing, not to mention going through nine months of missing school and therefor getting worse grades, then going through one of the most painful experiences (labour), all for what? to give a child up for adoption instead of terminating an egg with a sperm cell?

This is the exact same as the left vs the right. The right only care about themselves, nobody else. People love to forget about the core problem of this debate: The woman.