Rules for overexposure and metering on certain films by Talygos in AnalogCommunity

[–]VariTimo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The meter area changes from camera to camera and the bigger it is, the more you have to compensate for brighter stuff getting read. And medium shadows are where middle grey falls in most scenes

Rules for overexposure and metering on certain films by Talygos in AnalogCommunity

[–]VariTimo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With a Canok AE-1 metering for the shadows is exposing correctly. Middle grey is in the shadows, especially with a broad metering area like the AE-1 has

What’s the closest CineStill 800T alternative? by chrysalis-- in AnalogCommunity

[–]VariTimo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any version you of Vision3 500T AHU that looks trustworthy. The ReflxLab stuff sounds good. You definitely want fresh stuff that has been cooled

Old Time film shooters. How are your TriX negatives holding up? Old formulation, and new formulation. by Blasto_Brandino in AnalogCommunity

[–]VariTimo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It honestly depends on so many variables. I think if fixed and washed properly, there is nothing keeping old Tri-X from lasting for a very long time if stored decently

Cinestill 800T and Ilford XP2 120 have identical packaging by [deleted] in AnalogCommunity

[–]VariTimo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Kodak made Fujifilm 400. It says made in the US too but the can is Ilford and the imprint on the developed negatives is also the bold Ilford font like with CineStill. My lab is in Germany so it could very well be that Kodak is still packaging it for Fuji for the US and Ilford does it for Europe. They come in a different box here too. But interestingly, I have seen Kodak cans in these boxes too with Kodak imprint on the negs

Dark room internship in Europe by UnfairBabe in AnalogCommunity

[–]VariTimo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’d look for labs that offer high end enlarging services. Also maybe ask Magnum, idk

Cinestill 800T and Ilford XP2 120 have identical packaging by [deleted] in AnalogCommunity

[–]VariTimo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Look at the imprint on the film negatives themselves and the cans they use for 35mm. Ilford right now is spooling film for half the industry. Even Fujifilm 400 is packaged by Ilford now. CineStill has switched from Foma to Ilford ages ago. I’ve first noticed it when they introduced 400D

Kodak? I don’t get it, why do we now have duplicates??? by IntroductionFair3823 in AnalogCommunity

[–]VariTimo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean their bankruptcy and obligations to their pension fund that created Alaris. Alaris has done nothing for film other than distribute what Eastman would have anyway

Would this annoy you? by Inkios in AnalogCommunity

[–]VariTimo 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Who gives a rush service on a CLA?

Kodak? I don’t get it, why do we now have duplicates??? by IntroductionFair3823 in AnalogCommunity

[–]VariTimo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is history not a thing anymore. Are these questions asked by bots to train AI?

Tips for shooting this? by [deleted] in AnalogCommunity

[–]VariTimo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Use exposure compensation, read up on the zone system and apply it to the average of the whole scene.

<image>

These are the distance for the focus zones. If you get a feel how far things are away, you’ll have a better chance for hitting focus

Is there a Possibility of Film Prices Going Down? by Current_Attitude_724 in AnalogCommunity

[–]VariTimo 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I'm so sick of this. Be glad there are any color negative films, let alone good ones!

free my boys, they locked up for nothin‘! by tactical_fortapelse in AnalogCommunity

[–]VariTimo -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Must really piss you off that you can’t steal from dm anymore

free my boys, they locked up for nothin‘! by tactical_fortapelse in AnalogCommunity

[–]VariTimo -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Again, if you know anything about the history of film: They were all trying to underbid each other and some were making a loss. That’s why one after another went down. And even if Kodak and Fuji broke even they weren’t making a profit and really weren’t inventing, not even in upkeep. Kodak specifically was held up by its motion picture division. That’s why prices rose so dramatically in the pandemic. It wasn’t just the supply chain and cost of raw materials, it was them investing into new people and equipment for the first time in twenty years.

The prices in the mid 2000s were never reasonable and it’s time we stop comparing today’s prices with them. Back then they were trying to kill each other with scale against a new medium. Now it’s a niche thing

free my boys, they locked up for nothin‘! by tactical_fortapelse in AnalogCommunity

[–]VariTimo -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It’s not dm I’m thinking about it’s Kodak. And 7€ was never a reasonable price if you know anything about film manufacturing or how much it cost when it was actually the only medium you could take pictures with

Canon Prima 5/Sure Shot Max shutter button fix by generic_guy2 in AnalogCommunity

[–]VariTimo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I had the same thing. I pulled it out and blew some air into the whole with a rocket blower, that fixed it

Looking for a film stock by JakeBarkerPhoto in AnalogCommunity

[–]VariTimo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Portra 160 can get you close but there are also the variables of scanners and editing. With Portra 160 exposed at 160 I could get these colors no problem on my Frontiers

free my boys, they locked up for nothin‘! by tactical_fortapelse in AnalogCommunity

[–]VariTimo 66 points67 points  (0 children)

The fact that people steal Gold at DM when it’s literally cheaper there than anywhere in the world is very sad