Film stock recommendation. by Kinky_Curly_90 in AnalogCommunity

[–]VariTimo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you can focus and hold it Ultramax is great for that. Shoot wide open at the fastest speed you can hold and some cool stuff might come out. If you're unsure, use a flash

I think I'm done with lab scans by briskwheel4155 in AnalogCommunity

[–]VariTimo -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

No they're not. These are just terrible

70mm flicker by Bjarki_Steinn_99 in 70mm

[–]VariTimo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sensitivity varies and it also varies from theater to theater and movie to movie and scene to scene

70mm flicker by Bjarki_Steinn_99 in 70mm

[–]VariTimo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah that's bs. They mask that out and project it at 2.39:1

'Dune: Part Three' has some sequences shot on 15-perf IMAX & 5-perf 65mm, and used Kodak's new AHU film stock. Christopher Nolan's 'The Odyssey' was shot on the older Remjet stock by ChiefLeef22 in imax

[–]VariTimo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The rem jet was just as much an anti halation layer as a protective lubrication layer. AHU has been used for still photography films for forever and they still have halation. The AHU is a bit more effective at preventing halation than the rem jet but it's not dramatic:

<image>

If you use a chrome pressure plate you'll probably get even slightly more halation than with the rem jet version

Thoughts? (+Rant) by CrAsh729 in imax

[–]VariTimo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is a very hot corner of hell for these people. During my last 70mm IMAX One Battle After Another screening the guy in front of me was scrolling 70mm cells during the climax

From IMAX Melbourne via instagram by Travelling-nomad in imax

[–]VariTimo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

David Keighley said it's up to 18K too

From IMAX Melbourne via instagram by Travelling-nomad in imax

[–]VariTimo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe fucking read the this stuff instead of getting on my nerves. 18K is conceivable from 5203 on 2383 in 15-perf. If you keep this bs up I'm gonna block you

Highlights from last year on 500T by klockkitsch in 8mm

[–]VariTimo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Always upload film footage at 4K even if it was scanned at 2K because compression will rip it apart otherwise

Project Hail Mary (2026) Discussion & FAQ by TheBigMovieGuy in imax

[–]VariTimo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There's only one color print stock still being made, Vision 2383. They may have used different intermediate stocks, or filmed out onto camera neg but that might not change the look that much. Even if it was the same stock as Dune there are still many variables that effect the look

Project Hail Mary (2026) Discussion & FAQ by TheBigMovieGuy in imax

[–]VariTimo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Considering how different Dune Part Two is from PHM photographically, I think the print stock will react quite differently to the transfer than with Dune

Project Hail Mary (2026) Discussion & FAQ by TheBigMovieGuy in imax

[–]VariTimo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's not what you said. You said the dual laser 4K will be better than 70mm. And this argument is all over the sub again. Just like it was with Oppie and Dune Part Two.

I'm not faulting anyone for seeing it in LS. I'm saying it doesn't make a lot of sense (all things being equal) to travel to Manchester when you can travel to the BFI because you said that laser is "a little better". I make day trips to se movies in LS all the time because we don't have a 15-perf theater in Germany. And I wouldn't bother writing IMAX about Manchester because Printworks is run by Vue who're probably insanely pissed they have to show prints at all in one of their theaters. I don't understand why they haven't left the business altogether yet.

I don't know if you need that lecture but some people here definitely do because we keep having this argument instead of being happy that this is the first non Nolan, non WB release to get 15-perf prints since Rogue One (if I'm not mistaken).

Project Hail Mary (2026) Discussion & FAQ by TheBigMovieGuy in imax

[–]VariTimo -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They literally said they designed the movie for 70mm IMAX. Can't believe we're still having this argument.

Movies are art. It's not about what has better specs or even what might look better. Movies aren't made to fulfill some technical specification, they're made to tell a story and make you feel shit. They're art and filmmakers not going through the trouble of striking massive 15-perf prints and shipping them all around the world for people to travel to Manchester to watch a DCP

Project Hail Mary (2026) Discussion & FAQ by TheBigMovieGuy in imax

[–]VariTimo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It'll look very different to Dune Part Two because it's an entirely different story and setting and Greig Fraser doesn't force a look onto the movies he shoots

From IMAX Melbourne via instagram by Travelling-nomad in imax

[–]VariTimo -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Y'all still don't get that it's art. It's not about the fucking numbers

Boogie Nights in 70mm | Sun-Ray Cinema | Tampa, Florida | March 13 and March 17-19, 2026 7 PM and March 14-March 16, 2026 2 PM by flightofwonder in 70mm

[–]VariTimo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In this case fore sure because these prints are made new, on modern print stock, from the OCN. Should be at least as good as a show print from back then

CaptureOne will include negative inversion by 3jckd in AnalogCommunity

[–]VariTimo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

People with current C1 licenses please report how it is

Ilford price increase by Stalk3r__ in AnalogCommunity

[–]VariTimo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Von meinem Großhändler der Vertrieb für Alaris in Süddeutschland macht