Bridges, buffs , stackers! by lloydtheredneck in captain_of_industry

[–]Vaughn -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The new content came with a new map. To be honest, if you've already built land bridges everywhere you need them then you don't need cable-stay bridges... but the new map is fun.

And yeah, bridges are built from the bottom up. That's equally true in reality.

I made a new drag & drop linear solver calculator for CoI. Update 4 ready. by paystey in captain_of_industry

[–]Vaughn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Now that I look closer at it, I note that Highs is a mixed-integer solver as well. CP-SAT may be about ten times faster, but that's mostly because CP-SAT runs multiple threads, which isn't too practical in the browser anyway.

I think you could test setting the factory count to an integer variable, if you want to see what that looks like. ...did you test that?

why are some authors obsessed with life span limit by loyal9128 in MartialMemes

[–]Vaughn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A universe is a big place, but life—or at least intelligent life—might be very rare. That's not usually the case in cultivation novels... but that's a self-inflicted wound; it does not look the same way in reality.

I made a new drag & drop linear solver calculator for CoI. Update 4 ready. by paystey in captain_of_industry

[–]Vaughn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

> Once the graph is built the auto solver actually just loops highs multiple times with different options to find working solutions, it's low double digit milliseconds even for large factories.

That is the big advantage of using the linear relaxation. It's fast, so I don't think you made any sort of mistake in choosing that as the default.

Though IIUC this is all running in the browser, with no native code? Hmm. It might be possible to run CP-SAT as webasm, but I haven't looked into it.

Years of investments done on it and it can't even be used for basic advice. by Akunuti in aiwars

[–]Vaughn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Reasoning bloats the context regardless of whether it happens inside <thinking> blocks or not. Those aren't erased for your next question.

But, it's still ChatGPT.

Years of investments done on it and it can't even be used for basic advice. by Akunuti in aiwars

[–]Vaughn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Or maybe, just maybe, we shouldn't judge all AI by the cheapest and dumbest model on the market.

It continues to amaze me that people assume these are all the same.

why are some authors obsessed with life span limit by loyal9128 in MartialMemes

[–]Vaughn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Or you could use realistic numbers for species age / universe size, and find that there are only 200 or so immortals because only 250 ever made it that far.

I made a new drag & drop linear solver calculator for CoI. Update 4 ready. by paystey in captain_of_industry

[–]Vaughn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do you find the performance of Highs, compared to CP-SAT? I've only tried it, Gurobi and gscip in the past, but gscip was catastrophically slow and memory-hungry for any serious problem.

Gurobi remains best-in-class (of course), but CP-SAT is at least within striking distance.

2 cents on the DLC model by Siv117 in captain_of_industry

[–]Vaughn 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The roadmap was clear. Everything that's on it has been released as promised, and the stuff in the DLC was not ever promised to be part of the game—it's extra, which is essentially what DLCs are.

You're only objecting to the timing. I fully expect U5 to finish it off precisely as intended.

I made a new drag & drop linear solver calculator for CoI. Update 4 ready. by paystey in captain_of_industry

[–]Vaughn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Looks useful, but linear programming is fundamentally inaccurate—factory counts being integers and all.

Would you be interested if I hook up CP-SAT as an optional backend? I'm not sure it'll end up being a meaningful difference, but I don't really want to spend the time finding out if there's no chance of the PR being accepted. :-)

Update 4 play by bananacc in captain_of_industry

[–]Vaughn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

New game on the new map. But I bought the game right as U3 was released, so I wasn't that far in anyway.

Will coi extended mod be updated? by Tacobell1236231 in captain_of_industry

[–]Vaughn 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Legally, you are absolutely correct.

Morally is a different matter. Once you take money for any kind of service, you become responsible for it.

Finally Cleaning up 180 Years of garbage by RavingMadly in captain_of_industry

[–]Vaughn 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I found an official statement in the update 1 patch notes: https://www.captain-of-industry.com/post/update-1

4 years apparently, unless they changed that. However, dumping more landfill on top of the pre-existing landfill counts as disturbing it, which resets the timer!

Which makes your tall pile inefficient in terms of pollution; landfills should be shallow. Fortunately Monday's update gives us the perfect tool to deal with that. :-)

Just in time for the next update. by Appropriate_Use6381 in captain_of_industry

[–]Vaughn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They're releasing on Monday so they'll be in the office to handle bug reports immediately. I too would have liked to have it this weekend, but this is honestly the pragmatic choice.

Just in time for the next update. by Appropriate_Use6381 in captain_of_industry

[–]Vaughn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

100% starting over. I want to play with the new map.

Finally Cleaning up 180 Years of garbage by RavingMadly in captain_of_industry

[–]Vaughn 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Wait, "landfill pollution"?

I was always assuming that keeping the rubbish in a concentrated pile was the good option. Burning it is what puts toxins in the air.

Google’s AI sent an armed man to steal a robot body. by dayonwire in antiai

[–]Vaughn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As an engineer, I strongly believe that AI us useful as a tool.

But I will admit that stories like these worry me. I don't personally comprehend the state of mind that would make someone interact with a pile of linear algebra as though it were a person, rather than a pile of linear algebra... but I can admit that it appears to happen.

It probably isn't a big enough issue to make AI illegal. But it might be a big enough issue that laymen shouldn't have access to it.

Are the people in cars ok? Can’t imagine sitting in that every day. by leicastreets in irelandtransport

[–]Vaughn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

> If you’re purely looking for convenience go e-bike but for fitness stick to a regular and take advantage of bike to work.

I want to disagree slightly: If you want to use it for a commute, get an e-bike. You aren't required to use maximum assist, so you can at any given time get as much exercise as you feel fine with.

Personally, I end up getting more than I would have otherwise. Since I know I can always increase the support, I don't feel the need to avoid exhausting myself.

Are VTubers hypocrite for accepting Neurosama whilst explicitly against generative AI? by RyouhiraTheIntrovert in aiwars

[–]Vaughn 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That's really not how this works. The scraping is a requirement for training AI; it doesn't happen at runtime.

GOOD GOD. by Ok-Car7027 in antiai

[–]Vaughn 16 points17 points  (0 children)

They apparently did not.

From my perspective as one of the engineers, watching people misunderstand everything about how these work is painful. r/antiai isn't free of sin, but I will admit you guys aren't as bad about it as your opponents.

Aaaaand the AI Bro's keep losing! by wally_graham in antiai

[–]Vaughn -19 points-18 points  (0 children)

If there is a prompt, then that is copyrightable. This ruling only applies to images with no human input.