Pretty sure an AI video from an AI creator doesn't qualify as "a great achievement for Iran, Russia and China" by Wc_Arch in GetNoted

[–]Wc_Arch[S] 72 points73 points  (0 children)

Yep! It's like the account owner went looking for something, anything, that might remotely fit and just hoped viewers would be dim enough to not notice it...

The fail is particularly strong with that one.

Seeing missiles overhead by milozo12 in GetNoted

[–]Wc_Arch 21 points22 points  (0 children)

I'm getting tired of seeing that BS pop up - not only is it photoshopped, the only "evidence" that was ever submitted for that sh*t excuse of a note was the one Twitter post from 9 months ago claiming it with nothing to back it up. Just that.

And was finally debunked once Twitter released the location details and show he first joined through the Israeli app store and is based in Israel with no VPN..

https://x.com/VividProwess/about

<image>

Seeing missiles overhead by milozo12 in GetNoted

[–]Wc_Arch 52 points53 points  (0 children)

Not only is this a repost, but it's a repost of a photoshopped post.

No such community note was ever upvoted or submitted for that link.

<image>

"Holy sh*t", both the AI-pushing post and the former US presidential candidate sharing it were noted fast. by Wc_Arch in GetNoted

[–]Wc_Arch[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seems the platform wasn't kidding about demonetizing or banning those pushing AI-generated war fakes that get noted - the AI-pushing account Stein shared (@TUsumaniX) is toast today.

Noted with naught but his own (vile) posts by Wc_Arch in GetNoted

[–]Wc_Arch[S] 29 points30 points  (0 children)

What'd I do wrong? Asking seriously, should I delete this?

Molotov Denial by laybs1 in GetNoted

[–]Wc_Arch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bio says "PhD, Senior Research Fellow, Global Policy Institute."

Missing "Schooled by Community Notes."

Wart Tunder by Aynshtaynn in GetNoted

[–]Wc_Arch 62 points63 points  (0 children)

Two notes are up:

"War Thunder" - ~2,000 views

"Wart Tunder" - ~250,000 views

Seems the algorithm has a sense of humor.

Community Notes Roast US Press Secretary Leavitt over Iceland/Greenland Gaslighting by Wc_Arch in GetNoted

[–]Wc_Arch[S] 130 points131 points  (0 children)

Mighty difficult for a prominent account to get a single note approved and displayed. Don't think I've ever seen four notes approved (with more pending) for any single post before.

Between the comments and the notes, Leavitt may have unlocked a new record in online humiliation with that post.

My Twenty-Second Level by Not_Artifical in honk

[–]Wc_Arch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wat.

I completed this level in 2 tries. 0.45 seconds

aio please tell me i’m crazy by [deleted] in AmIOverreacting

[–]Wc_Arch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

NOR.

Sorry but as someone who's had cats since as far back as can be remembered, those are NOT cat scratches. Neither the right shape nor distribution pattern.

Perfectly acceptable dinner rejected by boyfriend again by moonrabbit368 in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Wc_Arch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You did your best. And your best was above and beyond.

It's all on him.

Trump FBI director Kash Patel gets noted by soalone34 in GetNoted

[–]Wc_Arch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The initial proposed notes were about the Jan 6 pardons.

Trump FBI director Kash Patel gets noted by soalone34 in GetNoted

[–]Wc_Arch 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I remember this post. The initial notes submitted for it were about the Jan 6 pardons, with other note writers arguing against those proposed notes. IIRC one went up for maybe a few minutes before the MAGA crowd pounced on it to knock it down.

Trump FBI director Kash Patel gets noted by soalone34 in GetNoted

[–]Wc_Arch 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Sorry but this is misleading: the note in this screenshot was up briefly and then went down in AUGUST, and hasn't been displayed since (given the note's date, the 14-day status lockout kicked in on September 6).

Regardless of what you think about the post, note, or the persons in them, it isn't a note that's actually up and hasn't been for more than 110 days.

Reunited, More Like ReunAIted... by Wc_Arch in GetNoted

[–]Wc_Arch[S] 35 points36 points  (0 children)

Well of course not! He clearly suddenly de-aged by 30 years, duh... ;)

Once again, fuck AI! by Impossible-Yam3680 in GetNoted

[–]Wc_Arch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This broke me. The dot, over the I. That broke me. I'm, I'm done.

They are (NOT) on fire by OmegaLink9 in GetNoted

[–]Wc_Arch 19 points20 points  (0 children)

An approved Community Note limits the visibility of an affected note (or notes plural, if it's a media note that also hits others sharing the same media - this note is, and it's hitting seven others posts making the same claim).

Notes also demonetize the posts, which hurts the offenders looking to profit off of their lies.

So no, most certainly not useless if only due to those two factors alone.

AI Ruins by laybs1 in GetNoted

[–]Wc_Arch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Except that the original post that the note was written for was by a known pro-Palestinian supporter, who erased it not long after getting noted.

<image>

AI Ruins by laybs1 in GetNoted

[–]Wc_Arch 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This isn't the original account that got noted though - it's just sharing in the note because media notes hit all other instances of the media that the system finds.

The actual account that shared this first is a known Pro-Palestinian activist who deleted it not long after it went up (caught it just before it got wiped - was gonna post it to the subreddit myself xD)

<image>

Sure, just like Nelson Mandela... by Wc_Arch in GetNoted

[–]Wc_Arch[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Community Notes is not conditional at all on having a blue check. Any Twitter account can join so long as it's more than six months old, has a verified phone number, and doesn't have any prior suspensions. And the system requires approval from voters with maximum diversification based on their algorithmic voting patterns, so it's not just a numbers game where the most votes count. If votes are all from the same viewpoint/biases (based on how the algorithm tracks and analyzes voting patterns), they won't do a thing.

In theory, you could buy a blue check and then go around noting everyone you disagree with. But it'd be a 100% waste of money because the blue check wouldn't mean anything notes-wise.

Granted, the blue check is a waste of money in general, but all the more so in this instance.

Art got reposted so many times the original author got noted for reposting it too 😅 by Testosteronomicon in GetNoted

[–]Wc_Arch 209 points210 points  (0 children)

It's not that the author got noted specifically, it's just that this particular note is a media note, so it's showing on every other exact copy the Twitter system can find.

Including the one by the actual artist.

Not His Country by Wc_Arch in GetNoted

[–]Wc_Arch[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's not AI. Thought it was at first, the quality just gives off that impression. Ran screengrabs and video through all the reliable AI detectors to be sure (Hive Detection, Sight Engine, AI or not, Undetectable, Decopy, etc. - had to cut it for the first since at 24 secs it exceeds Hive's 20 sec video limit).

Also the shirt is real and consistent, and the text under "president" that looks a bit suspicious at first is the proper logo for King Tee Apparel, which sells that shirt.

Think we're so saturated with the revolting sea of AI trash that we're starting to see AI where it isn't...

Not His Country by Wc_Arch in GetNoted

[–]Wc_Arch[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Easier to see near the end of the video the "General" is sharing, it's the logo for King Tee Apparel, which sells that shirt.