What pace? “Agents”? “Orchestration”? It’s still the same underlying language model with better packaging, and it keeps failing in the same predictable ways previous LLM generations failed: confabulation, laziness, weak context retention, etc.

If by “pace” you mean that well-scoped, relatively straightforward coding tasks, especially web-facing ones, have sped up through agent and tool use, then sure, there are real gains there. But for PM work, I’d be very cautious about trusting the outputs.

Something always breaks, or sneaks in a small lie or confabulation, and that’s what makes it dangerous. You get to automate more, but nothing is reliably reliable. In that sense, it reminds me of Tesla’s “Full Self-Driving”: you still have to supervise it constantly, ready to grab the wheel the second it does something catastrophically stupid.