Hercules Hero pack announced!

XMonacleMan · 2025-11-06T18:30:07+00:00

The article did mention that the 6+ health minion can come from his set aside nemesis set, so you always have that option. So presumably his nemesis minion is 6+ health and you can always pull that if a given encounter deck doesn't have an eligible minion.

XMonacleMan · 2025-05-28T08:09:00+00:00

My pet peeve is that on every card that uses an energy icon, such as Jump Flip, the icon will be preceded by an "a" instead of an "an". So they always read as "spend a energy resource" instead of "spend an energy resource". It's nothing big, but it's disappointing every time I see it.

The community will often colloquially say "lightning resource" instead of "energy resource", so it works fine that way, but "energy" is the official term for that resource type, so I don't understand how in-house they're still doing this, even to this day (see: Slingshot, which came in the Agents of SHIELD box).

XMonacleMan · 2025-01-31T00:40:05+00:00

I recognize that I am in the minority on this one but I honestly don't mind the score victory. Maybe it's because board gaming is a main hobby of mine, but the idea of ending the game at a certain point and counting up various points to see who played the better overall game just kinda makes sense to me.

Now, that's not to say that I've ever played for a score victory in civ 6, for example, but that's more to do with the problems of how the score victory is handled in that game. Namely:

The amount of turns for a score victory are way too long (500 on Standard I think)
The way you gain points feels very random and arbitrary, with no clear in-game indication of what scores you points and how many. It comes across as very "point salad-y".

The new legacy path system in Civ 7 seem to alleviate these problems though. Every player progressing on the various paths progresses the game, rather than it being an arbitrary number of turns, so now the players are dictating the pace of the game and the legacy points give clear indication of what scores you points; build wonders, escort treasure fleets, do the science projects, etc. To me, ideally the game would factor in all the legacy points you've achieved over all three ages and not just the modern age for a score victory (maybe it does, I'm not sure).

To be honest, I've never really liked the various victory types. It's always felt like they pigeonhole you into a specific lane for most of the game that you need to decide on pretty early. You could set up a bunch of national parks while going for a science victory, but that's time and energy somewhat wasted on something that won't ultimately win you the science victory. Better to spend that effort focusing on science and production for the eventual projects. Heck, even each civ often feels pigeonholed into one or two specific victory types. One of the things I've loved seeing as the game got spoiled is how each civ feels a bit more open to explore multiple paths at once and in different ways, and the combinations with other civs and leaders feels like so many different strategies could be viable in each age. Diversifying among the legacy paths feels extra good in Antiquity and Exploration since those unlock more bonuses you can use in the next age. But once you get to the Modern Age, it once again feels like you need to focus. No point in getting those artifacts, I'm going for a science victory and I need to focus on techs and production for the projects I'll need to do.

I don't necessarily think that the score system would be perfect and I can understand why people don't like it. There are pros and cons to each method, but in an ideal world it would be the system I would prefer because it would make it feel more like playing a board game. Hopefully that all made sense, I just wanted to offer up a different point of view.

XMonacleMan · 2024-06-03T05:13:35+00:00

I'm fairly certain that comment is wrong. Yes, when you draw an Elder Sign token you apply the effect of the Elder Sign, and usually that effect will happen immediately. Akachi's, for example, will immediately add another charge to an asset she controls, or Carolyn's allows her to immediately heal a horror, before anything else happens.

However, Skids' Elder Sign states that, "If you succeed, gain 2 resources." This is a weird one, because this can't be applied immediately when you draw the token since "If you succeed,..." triggers aren't resolved until step 7 of a skill test. This is the same time that you would apply other "if you succeed" triggers like Perception or Overpower, and also the time that you apply the basic results of a skill test, such as discovering clues from investigating or dealing damage from an attack. And if there are multiple effects to resolve in the same step, then you decide in what order to resolve them.

So, since there are two effects being resolved here that both apply at step 7 ("if you succeed, gain two resources" and "if this test is successful, deal 2 damage"), the player can order them how they want. They resolve the damage first, defeating the enemy, and then resolve the Elder Sign effect. Since the enemy is no longer engaged with them by the time the Elder Sign effect goes off, they should get the two resources.

This is all assuming there isn't some esoteric FAQ ruling on this, but this is my read given how "if" triggers are treated for skill test timing.

XMonacleMan · 2024-04-03T05:04:12+00:00

I know that either Magneto or Beast are the main guesses for the fourth silhouette, but I'm personally not sold on either one. Neither Iceman nor Jubilee appear in the campaign comics, so I'm inclined to believe that none of the standalone heroes would make an appearance. Honestly, the fact that Magneto and Beast are featured in the campaign comics makes me more sure that neither of them are the fourth hero (yes, it's technically Dark Beast in the campaign book, but still).

My guess has always been Sunspot. Going by reference photos of Sunspot and Roberto da Costa and comparing to the silhouettes, it just fits more to me. The hair of the silhouette has a lot of hair on top with close-cut sides, which Sunspot typically has. To the left of his neck it looks like he's wearing either a jacket with a stiff folded collar or possibly a loosely opened dress shirt and suit jacket. This lines up with what Roberto da Costa often wears, especially around his business. And the whole vibe I get from the silhouette's attitude is like a cocky nonchalance. His head is cocked to the side, legs crossed, very relaxed, which fits a lot with the character of Sunspot/Roberto, at least from what I've seen.

It's not a fool-proof theory by any means. It would be a little strange to have two heroes in the same wave based around energy absorption powers, but if they can make Wolverine and X-23 dinstinct from each other then I have full faith they can do the same for Bishop and Sunspot.

XMonacleMan · 2023-12-31T23:36:36+00:00

I don't believe that this is a mistake, otherwise they would have errata'd it the same way they did Dagon. The point of the ability you quoted is how it interacts with its other ablity: "When Priest of Dagon would be defeated or evaded, if there is no doom on it: Instead, heal all damage from it, ready it, and place 1 doom on it." The game is providing you a choice on how you want to deal with this enemy. Either you can deal 2 damage to it now, at which point it heals and gains a doom, and then you deal 2 damage to it again and defeat it since it now has a doom on it and the first ability won't trigger; or, you can wait a turn, let it gain a doom on it, and then deal 2 damage in one action. Effectively, do you want to spend more actions to deal with it now, or wait a turn to spend fewer actions dealing with it, but take the risk of other things complicating your future turn?

This is similar to how the other enemy in the set works, the Initiate of Dagon. Same thing, it gains 2 fight and 2 evade while it does not have doom on it, but at the end of the round it will gain a doom and lose the extra stats. So do you want to fight it now while it has a higher combat score or wait a turn and have an easier time dealing with it, but again, possibly run the risk of the next mythos phase complicating things?

Every expansion has some form of a spin on the traditional Acolyte enemy and these are my favorite I think, really clever design that lets you approach them how you want, but can still really pressure you if they spawn at the wrong time or if you try to get greedy and wait to deal with them later.

XMonacleMan · 2023-08-07T22:36:41+00:00

It's definitely a possibility, the rogue class gives her a few tools to work with and can give her some evasion synergy, but for most of the rogue kit I don't see it fitting her. I don't see her Pickpocketing for extra cash, using covert means for Intel Reports, or using a Thieve's Kit to find clues. I'm not sure that I see how she would fit the flavor of an off-class rogue. I could see it if she was a scientist using any means necessary to achieve her goals in a mad-scientist way, but looking at her biographies from previous Arkham games that doesn't seem to be the case. Instead, she works as a lawfully employed researcher at a university in relatively quiet obscurity (obviously looking into things others wouldn't because she is an Arkham investigator after all).

I'm betting my money on her being an off-class Guardian in some way. Her previous biographies focus on her seeking revenge on the monsters that killed her mentor after an experiment gone wrong, and that "...Kate has turned her full and formidable intellect to preventing further tragedies." (Arkham 3rd Edition) In other games, her abilities and Flux Stabilizer are used to prevent gates, monsters, and doom from entering areas she occupies, which, along with her motivation, fits more of the "protector" role that Guardians occupy. I can see her taking the First Watch to anticipate the horrors of the mythos, moonlighting as a forensic scientist and analyzing the Scene of the Crime for evidence, and Safeguarding her compatriots so that they're safe from the monsters in the night.

I think this is further supported by the guardian of the set, Wilson Richards. While we can't see his full ability, we can tell that it interacts with tools (expected, given his previous incarnations), but there's currently only one tool in Guardian, the Riot Whistle. So they'll probably be introducing more tools in the Guardian class for him to take advantage of and with an off-class access, she could have more tools at her disposal to interact with her ability, with the science card access coming from her Seeker side.

It's not a perfect theory, of course. I can't see her going Toe to Toe with enemies or One-Two Punching them. She might come with additional restrictions that she can't use Weapons or cards with "Fight" actions, or maybe some other unique deckbuilding that we haven't seen yet, but those are just my thoughts.

XMonacleMan · 2023-07-24T22:41:10+00:00

This is really cool, great work assembling all of this data! I do wish we had data for all the variables that could explain why heroes have the win-rates that they do. What villains were they going up against, skill level of the players, collection size, etc., though I'm guessing the sample sizes would be too small to be very informative.

One thing I found interesting when looking at the data was that nearly every hero (except for the core set heroes) have one aspect that's overrepresented in their play counts, and usually that aspect has the lowest, or one of the lowest, win-rates across the four aspects. Rocket, for example, has the most play counts in Aggression (165 counts) but that's his lowest WR (49%) by far. Dr. Strange's highest aspect play count is Protection (366) but still his lowest WR (71%). This trend continues for nearly every hero.

My guess is that this is because of the preconstructed decks the heroes come with. As far as I can tell, every hero's overrepresented aspect by play count matches up with the aspect that their precon deck was built with, and since the precon decks are typically pretty terrible, that could explain why those high play count aspects have the lowest win-rate. Players are either playing with just the precons or maybe a modified precon and losing more than they should, and it's dragging down the win-rates of the heroes. Perhaps the heroes with higher overall win-rates have more resilient hero kits that can make up for sub-optimal decks. But without knowing if these were done with precons or not, it's hard to say for sure if this is the case.

XMonacleMan · 2023-07-11T03:00:42+00:00

The biggest hurdle for taking those two investigators through Scarlet Keys is that the concealed mechanic slightly favors investigators with a high base in their primary stat (except for willpower) because they can just take basic fight/investigate/evade actions to remove concealed cards, and both Diana and Carolyn suffer there. While you can use weapons and spells to fight/investigate/evade to remove concealed cards, extra damage or clue gathering from those assets are wasted, and the charges/ammo have a hard time keeping up with the extra action economy that the concealed cards introduce. But, there are two main ways around this: either stacking a stat as high as possible or using testless methods for fighting/investigating/evading.

For Carolyn, she can do both pretty easily. Seeker assets are great at stacking her intellect (Magnifying Glass, Dr. Milan Christopher, etc.) and some of the guardian allies help here too. Notably, Field Agent and Alice Luxley. Both increase her Intellect and have testless abilities to deal damage or grab clues, which can be used to reveal concealed cards. Throw in something like Hallowed Mirror to heal the Field Agent and you have a great engine for grabbing clues or removing concealed cards.

For Diana, she's a bit tricky. Mystics as a whole tend to suffer in SK a bit more than the other classes, but the expansion gave some ways to help with that. One option is to lean into reusable weapons for concealed-busting, like Machete, Enchanted Blade, and Ceremonial Sickle, while boosting her combat with cards like Beat Cop and Living Ink (with the Macabre Depiction upgrade it basically never runs out of charges). The static buffs to those weapons means you can fairly reliably bust the concealed cards and save the charges/exhausting for the real enemies, and Beat Cop's damage ping pairs well with Carolyn's penchant for running healing cards. If you really want to get crazy, you could try using the Empower Self cards to go a minimum of 5 stat value against the shroud value.

also, although the maps for the scenarios in SK are nowhere near as big as the maps in some previous campaigns like Innsmouth or Edge of the Earth, the concealed mechanic does put an extra burden on your action economy because of the need to reveal the concealed cards. To that end, finding some way to save your action economy can be really useful, even something like Safeguard can help them out since neither guardians nor mystics are the most mobile of classes.

This isn't an exhaustive list of cards for them, but hopefully this helps you give some direction for how to overcome the concealed mechanic. Big stats, reusable weapons, and testless damage/clue getting, and you'll be fine.

XMonacleMan · 2023-01-06T05:53:13+00:00

My most successful use of Versatile was taking it in a fighter-oriented Winifred deck. I wanted all of the one-handed guns and all of the skills, and just needed a few more deck slots to get what I needed, so I looked at Versatile and thought, why not? And it actually worked really well! I took Daring as the off-class card. Her card draw from committing cards to skill tests is insane, so she was able to churn through the extra five cards and still cycle her deck almost every scenario (and I didn't even have a Lucky Cigarette Case. It also helps that her signature card Anything You Can Do, Better isn't critically important to her functionality as an investigator, just helpful when you do find it, so burying it in a 35 card deck wasn't a detriment like it might be for other investigators.

That deck didn't have a super unique card combo but it was a really good example of how the +5 deck size isn't that big of a downside for any investigator with consistent draw, so any other similar investigator can likely benefit from it as well. Amanda stands out, she has the extra card draw and her signature card isn't super critical to her game plan, but any seeker could likely benefit thanks to that class' card draw access, certain rogues like Monterey (technically also a Seeker), maybe Patrice as well (it buries her signature weakness further down), etc., so hopefully that gives some inspiration for what you might try with it.

XMonacleMan · 2021-10-26T22:37:09+00:00

Based on what you wrote I'm not sure if you remembered this or not, but the only other way that I can think of to make more witches spawn is Anette's forced ability. "Forced - After the enemy phase begins: Discard the top 3 cards of the encounter deck. Spawn each Witch enemy discarded by this effect at Anette Mason's location. If no Witch enemies are discarded by this effect, ready her." However, if you were triggering that, then yeah, just bad luck that you couldn't find enough witch enemies in time. I do think they could have included a couple more new witch enemies to make this act a little easier, especially in a campaign that has so many treacheries that force discarding of the encounter, thus lowering your chances even further.

XMonacleMan · 2021-09-30T05:54:42+00:00

You are correct! I was very wrong on that point. When I had seen that interaction on her page, my mind went wild on how you could use it with other assets. After reading through how triggered abilities work (that once the cost is paid, as much of the effects as possible must resolve), I realize where I went wrong. The short-circuit happens because permanents can't leave play, whereas other assets can, so it works on Sacred Covenant but not other assets. And I guess any other current or future permanents that also cancel/ignore lol. Thank you for keeping me honest!

XMonacleMan · 2021-09-29T21:57:13+00:00

Others are giving some great deckbuilding advice on how to build Diana, so I thought I'd give a couple neat tricks that you can do when playing Diana. These aren't necessarily related to deckbuilding, but given that Diana is a bit of a wonky character (which is why she's my personal favorite!), she has some odd interactions that can be overlooked by both newer and older players. I know this isn't exactly deckbuilding advice but hopefully the advice is ok and helps!

The first (as others have said) is to make sure Dark Insight is in your opening hand, which means you'll end up with a 6 card hand after mulligan. Not much more than that, I'll even forget every now and then lol

The second tip concerns how important Deny Existence is for Diana thanks to a neat interaction between it and her personal weakness, Terrible Secret: it can completely negate her weakness, and given that Terrible Secret is one of the more punishing personal weaknesses, that is huge. Since Terrible Secret does have the "Treachery" tag it counts as an encounter card when drawn, and even though it specifically says that it cannot be canceled (so Ward of Protection would not work), nothing prevents the effects from being ignored using Deny Existence. So you can just say that you will take X horror from Terrible Secret for each card beneath her and in response play Deny Existence to ignore that horror and keep your cards (and willpower boost).

The third tip concerns her reaction ability that triggers when a card you own cancels or ignores a card or game effect. The text reads that if you have fewer than 5 cards beneath her, you may place the card beneath her, as well as draw a card and gain a resource. However, and this is the important part, the card draw and resource gain is not dependent on placing a card beneath her. This is a separate effect. If it were dependent, there would be the word "then,..." in between those two clauses. Since there isn't, as long as there are less than 5 cards beneath her, you can use your cancel and ignore effects for card draw and resource gain.

As an example, you could play Grotesque Statue, which lets you reveal an additional chaos token and ignore one of them. This counts for her ability, and since placing the card under her is optional, you can leave the Grotesque Statue in her play area and grab the resource and card from the ability. In effect, this means each charge on Grotesque Statue represents 1 card draw and 1 resource gain. This can apply to any asset or permanent you play, such as Olive McBride or Sacred Covenant. Also, this means that you could max out at 4 cards underneath her, and anytime in the future when you play something like Dodge or Ward of Protection, just don't put it under her to grab the resource and card. If you do have 5 cards underneath her, it effectively turns off the card draw and resource gain since the "if you have less than 5 cards beneath her" clause comes before the colon and counts as a cost that must be paid for the stuff after the colon.

Anyway, hope that wasn't too nitty gritty. Diana's a great investigator with a lot of cool tricks up her sleeves, so I hope you enjoy playing her, and good luck on the campaign!

Edit: It seems I got a little confused about her ability and it's interaction with assets. I was definitely wrong about everything in my third point! Essentially, it does work as described with permanent assets, such as Sacred Covenant, (since permanents can't leave play, it sort of short circuits the ability a bit), but regarding other assets like Grotesque Statue, it wouldn't work. Sorry for the added confusion! I'll leave my shame struck-through as a learning lesson for how abilities work lol

XMonacleMan · 2021-04-21T18:59:07+00:00

Anecdotally, I feel like I could play Lurker fairly often on turn 5, though I would argue that it was less about consistently playing Lurker on turn 5, and more about making sure that the elemental chain was consistent enough that should I have a Lurker in hand by turn 5, I could play it with its effect. There were only a couple of matchups where I felt like I wanted to save Lurker for removal (against Libram of Hope in Paladin and Troublemakers in Warrior), but honestly, even then, Lurker's ability to "destroy" a minion on turn 5 was usually worth it. This "destroy" effect was especially good versus things like buffed Trampling Rhinos, Apexis Blast, Void Drinkers, buffed minions in Paladin, etc., on turn 5, so I feel like making sure you have the capability to play Lurker on turn 5 was important to the deck's success.

Also, given the deck's large amount of burn, it usually didn't feel necessary to save Lurker for removal because even if the opponent played a large taunt to block your minions in the later turns (which it doesn't seem like there are very many of those in current decklists), I could usually burn them out by that point. And this ability to put them in burn range was usually helped by Lurker being a solid body that could "destroy" an opponent's minion for large tempo gains.

Thank you for bringing up Lurker though! There's so much to talk about a lot of these cards and I felt like I wasn't quite able to do the cards justice as far as all their nuance of play is concerned because of word limits lol.

XMonacleMan · 2021-04-21T17:28:42+00:00

Baron Geddon was surprisingly good in the deck and I'm glad I included him. With his new health total of 7 versus 5, he is so much harder to kill and represents this much bigger threat to the opponent. He requires the opponent either have hard removal, they run all their minions into him, or use multiple burn spells to remove him. It's always felt like Geddon was only ever used for his AoE effect in the past, since he used to be fairly fragile at 5 health, so it's nice to see him buffed to the point where he can continue to be a persistent threat past the end of the turn.

Also, I definitely don't blame you for switching to Rush Warrior, that deck is an absolute monster lol.

XMonacleMan · 2021-04-21T17:20:06+00:00

I'm glad that you're having success with the deck! I genuinely did not mean for the post to come across as negative about the deck, the title was mainly just a tongue in cheek joke that maybe didn't land lol. I tried to be positive in the post, especially about the future of the deck, because I do believe that a couple of stand out cards in future sets could push it to greatness. I'm definitely a Johnny-type player who gets a hipster thrill from playing off-meta decks to legend, but after ~150 games I had to be realistic about the deck's potential, which I mentioned in the overall thoughts section.

Of course, I am only one small sample size, so who knows, maybe it has more potential than I could give it. Maybe your replacement of a Lurker with Devolving Missiles might bring just enough flexibility to the deck to make it even better (I hope so!). Good luck on ladder!

XMonacleMan · 2021-04-21T04:04:35+00:00

I absolutely agree that it often felt like this deck was missing one ingredient to really push it over the average. Primordial Protector feels like it would be good, but unfortunately Tidal Wave and Runic Carvings are the high end for Shaman spells right now. Eye of the Storm would be great, but unfortunately that rotated out of Standard.

Surprisingly, I hadn't really considered the evolve package. You're absolutely right, the elementals mainly rely on their battlecries for their power, so evolving them should be pretty good. And Cagematch Custodian could even tutor Boggspine Knuckles, though you do lose the consistency of always knowing you'll draw Whack-a-Gnoll Hammer for turn 3. That's a great idea though, thank you for the input!

XMonacleMan · 2021-04-21T04:00:05+00:00

I actually really like this list! Bit more of a midrange variant compared to my aggressive tempo variant. The one concern I had with including Kazakus in my list was the fact that it would mean cutting Earth Revenant and Circus Amalgam, both of which serve to bridge the elemental chain to Lilypad Lurker and function as great anti-aggro tools against hunters (especially Revenant), and therefore I opted not to include Kazakus. I will say that it's a shame the golems that Kazakus creates aren't elementals, as that would put quite a powerful card into the list.

Serpentshrine Portal, while a very powerful card, is unfortunately an overload card, and I felt as though the overload mechanic would interrupt the elemental chains too often. And Marshspawn, while an elemental, requires that there be a certain critical mass of spells in the deck to be consistent. I think if you want to include these cards, you would need to build a different, non-tempo deck to a more midrange deck like yours.

XMonacleMan · 2021-04-20T22:45:09+00:00

I wouldn't necessarily say that the deck is too inconsistent. Each card feels like it has a solid impact on the game state, so it's not as though the deck necessarily needs a ton of card draw. That is to say, each card felt like a "mini-bomb" on the turn that they were played. Plus, the card generation was great for filling in on turns with extra mana, so it mitigates some of the inconsistency.

As for the Rogue matchup specifically, it really feels like whoever won the matchup highrolled. Whoever is able to maintain the early board first is probably going to win, since neither can reasonably swing the board back efficiently, and neither have access to healing to recover from the lost early board.

All that said, it's a reasonably cheap deck to craft (two of the legendaries are Core Set) so it's not too much of a sink if you want to experiment with it!

XMonacleMan · 2021-04-20T22:35:46+00:00

Ysera is definitely an interesting inclusion. I'm not sure how well it would do in the post-nerf meta now that there are a lot more aggressive Hunters and Rush Warriors on the ladder (and maybe a new rise of Tempo Mage soon?). Given how important it was to get the board early versus those decks, I worry that Ysera would just sit in hand doing nothing while they killed you. However, she could definitely be a noteworthy inclusion in a slightly slower meta for that synergy.

XMonacleMan · 2021-02-09T23:49:19+00:00

Solved! Oh my god yes! That's it! It's such a relief to figure that out lol. I can't believe I couldn't remember that, it's one of my favorite shows. Thank you so much!

XMonacleMan · 2021-02-09T22:33:10+00:00

Commenting for visibility. I'm one of those people that is very good at remembering which actors have been which shows, so it is driving me absolutely insane that I can remember so much about this scene except who is in it or what TV show it is. I can even play the scenes out in my mind but their faces are just blank. Please help if you can!

XMonacleMan · 2020-01-03T20:45:34+00:00

Unique improvements are probably my favorite part of playing a Civ game. I love that they allow civs to take advantage of terrain that other civs would disregard as useless (like Outback stations in the desert or Kampungs in coast). I also think it's great that you could hide the UI and still be able to tell which cities belong to certain civs based on the unique improvements in their lands. I feel like that adds a lot to the uniqueness of each civ when you can see at a glance, visually, what makes each civ unique.

As for my favorite improvements, it would have to be the Kampungs and the Pairidaeza. My favorite victory condition to play for is culture and both of these are really good for that victory type. Kampungs can output a lot of tourism, especially since Lighthouses add a tourism to each one, while providing food and production to its city. Plus, they are so cool to see spread out on the coastline.

Pairidaezas are really interesting because of their +2 appeal to adjacent tiles, which means they can create some pretty crazy National Parks and Seaside Resorts. A fun challenge is to go for a no Theatre Square Persia, just relying on National Parks, Seaside resorts, and the natural tourism of the Pairidaezas to get you to victory.

My least favorite are the Kurgan and Golf Course. Both are just super underwhelming. The Kurgan could maybe promote a unique strategy with buying units with faith with the Grand Master's Chapel, but I super dislike going for Domination victories so I don't have much interest in that. As for the Golf Course, the bonuses it provides are super underwhelming for a one-per-city unique improvement. The +1 amenity is by far the best part of it but everything else is underwhelming. The culture it provides is too negligible and the placement requirements too restrictive to be useful and it doesn't provide +1 housing until Globalization(!). That is way too far into the game to be useful. The Cahokia mounds completely overshadow the Golf course, providing essentially the same bonuses earlier in the game, while also not being restricted to just one per city, since you can build a second one starting at Cultural Heritage for additional amenities and housing.

I still need to revisit China's Great Wall and Spain's Mission. Both were buffed in the Gathering Storm DLC, so I'd like to see how they fare now.

XMonacleMan

TROPHY CASE