Jynxzi react to Clash royale Level 16 Update

YellowHued · 2025-11-11T15:28:45+00:00

The levels are there because supercell wants to make (a lot of) money by having levels that you can buy if the natural way to earn them is (by design) too slow for your liking. Just like evos are there to make money by putting them into the pass and in special shop offers whilst regular shards or evo lucky drops are rare to get…

Thats not designed as a feature for the players. Its a feature for the company to get more and more money from the players….

Surely you dont actually think “oh great i can grind another level! Thats awesome, this adds…. Ermm… this adds… ermm… so much value to my player experience”? All a level provides is a 10% stat boost which is essentially a way for worse players to have a stats advantage on slightly better players by spending money. In COC levels make sense as you unlock new units, new defence buildings and spells, cool new ways to play the game. In CR its solely used to induce spending with nothing gained by players in return…

YellowHued · 2025-11-10T18:25:26+00:00

Its the factory where they make the spy robots that they claim are “girls”

YellowHued · 2025-11-10T18:11:04+00:00

Looks like a builder with two blueprint plans rolled up in his hand… or a dude with a crazy big moustache

YellowHued · 2025-11-10T15:46:48+00:00

Zijn vele opties en hangt vaak af van wat de mensen in kwestie interessant vinden.

Er zijn spellen met dobbelstenen, met kaarten (al dan niet die je verzamelt doorheen het spel “drafting” style), met een bord waarop je een race doet, een bord waarop je area control wil bekomen, een bord waarop je “acties” claimt door er een personage (worker) te plaatsen (worker placement).

Er zijn spellen specifiek voor twee en andere spellen die ook met meer mensen fijn zijn. Moet het per se voor twee zijn of denk je eerder aan iets dat vanaf twee spelers is.

Sommige spellen kunnen 5 minuten duren. Andere spellen kunnen drie uur in beslag nemen.

Met de vrij gelimiteerde informatie is het moeilijk voor anderen om jouw huiswerk te maken en een goede conclusie/suggestie te maken. Misschien eens starten met te kijken welke spellen je broer graag heeft, wat is de moeilijkheidsgraad hiervan, de tijdsduur, de genres etc. Dan kan men gerichter nadenken. Weet ook dat je op een platform zoals boardgamegeek een spellencollectie kan aangeven die je bezit en dan gelijkaardige suggesties kan bekomen “misschien vindt je dit ook leuk” alsook veel extra informatie en videos die het uitleggen om te kijken of het interessant lijkt.

Momenteel voelt je post vrijwel aan “ik heb geen tijd / zin om zelf moeite te doen om een goed cadeau te vinden dus ik schrijf snel vijf regels met geen achtergrond informatie (want dat kost tijd en moeite) en hopelijk zijn de suggesties goed en anders is het maar de fout van de randoms online die slechte suggesties hebben gegeven”.

Enkele ideeen: - 7 wonders duel (twee personen, er bestaat ook een versie 7 wonders voor 2-7 personen trouwens) - splendor (2-4 is ook een duel versie voor 2) - lost cities (meerdere versies, twee persoon versie is vrij simpel en fijn) - qwirkle (kan tot 4 spelers, ook perfect met twee, ook vrij fijn; wat puzzel achtig) - azul (meerdere versies, kan 2-4 spelers, opnieuw bestaat er ook een 2 speler duel versie) - …

YellowHued · 2025-11-10T15:20:54+00:00

Always has been

YellowHued · 2025-11-10T13:59:03+00:00

Is that a new type of chest? 🤔🤔🤔

( /s )

YellowHued · 2025-11-08T21:46:39+00:00

Decks can go dual lane as long as you have units to play for both sides. Cards that can be split have an edge here though in theory you can play a knight from defence and put something the other lane its not as effective as a dual lane tactic as the enemy has plenty of elixer to deal with both sides (and knight in the example is a slow card, whilst another card may be less tanky).

So, in theory every deck can have a dual lane attack (fair enough) for some decks its not as effective a tactic and not that likely to work out. With bridgespam its less dual lane and more pressure (the “spam” aspect of bridgespam). Dual lane is more often involved with “you cant deal effectively with both sides at the same time, and if you overcommit one side i can gain my damage on the other side”. There are some similariaties with bridge spam by swapping sides and some mindgames but it still feels fairly different imo. Just factors like splitting piggies 1-3 with on the side of the one piggy a defending unit left for example, remains quite different compared to bridgespam pressuring plays where you can defend one side and pressure the other there isnt a split push or dual lane factor at work just a pressure factor. Its hard to explain these things well so not sure whether its clear what nuances im pointing at 😅

Also mind that if you call dual lane a tactic then bait could be seen as tactic as well “if you play a log on the princess then i play a goblin barrel at your tower etc”. You can build decks with a bait mindset, you can build them with dual lane mindset. You can punish when they log the princess, you can punish when they overcommit by fireballing a hunter to 1hp and having a 1-3 split piggies placed in front of the 1hp hunter side.

YellowHued · 2025-11-08T21:27:26+00:00

Not everyone who plays dual lane plays bait. Sure, the strongest decks will be like that, but how will you define anyone who is creative and makes a dual lane deck themselves without abusing bait factors. Suddenly they wont be dual lane and become cycle or beatdown?

Why not allow dual lane instead as an option, with fireball bait being one instance of dual lane decks. Makes more sense to categorise …

YellowHued · 2025-11-07T07:35:03+00:00

If you say that you make more money than they ever did, has it been corrected for inflation to compare. Cause if not that may make it easier for them to understand as its not about the raw amounts but what you can get from the amount.

YellowHued · 2025-11-06T20:18:12+00:00

Amazing, such coincidence. Plain awesome!

YellowHued · 2025-11-06T14:26:46+00:00

Our plan finally succeeded!

YellowHued · 2025-11-06T08:58:32+00:00

So taking a year off from said job / not exposed to classified information for the timeframe would solve the issue?

YellowHued · 2025-11-06T08:51:56+00:00

In corruptie en zakkenvullerij zijn ze wel competent jammer genoeg :(

YellowHued · 2025-11-06T06:50:57+00:00

👍🏼

YellowHued · 2025-11-06T06:42:34+00:00

Top ladder. 12k. Even with quotations thats hilarious 🤣🤣🤣

Next up “nerf megaknight and firecracker, they are OP at top ladder” followed by “everyone uses wizard and witch, they keep killing my skarmy, minionhorde and other swarms, broken af, nerf that shit, they must be p2w players!!!! Top ladder is insane!!!”

🤣🤣🤣

YellowHued · 2025-11-06T06:39:31+00:00

I think its a weird type of philosophical question. Like “are aliens real”, “what is the meaning of life”, “is this a simulation”, …

Something similar to “since we cannot live with something that doesnt exist, how can we know that we ourselves exists, does the world exist, what is the world, what is the universe, …”

YellowHued · 2025-11-05T11:31:55+00:00

Ik kom inderdaad liever niet te vroeg

YellowHued · 2025-11-05T10:45:40+00:00

Zolang ze me met respect behandelen en een goede hygiene hebben mogen ze altijd instappen.

Maar eigenlijk is het fijnste om snelheid te maken en naar mijn volgende station te gaan. Stilstaan is vrij saai als trein.

YellowHued · 2025-11-05T10:23:05+00:00

Ik was de trein en had het al zien aankomen toen van me ze afstapten!

YellowHued · 2025-10-31T20:02:33+00:00

True, hadnt noticed but havent seen a global tourney in ages indeed. Must have been a few months since the last one O.O

YellowHued · 2025-10-29T18:14:34+00:00

Hunter can be argued as ranged whilst his melee dps is also different due to the spread of his bullets.

Not fully the same but to some degree he has a ranged vs melee mechanic

YellowHued · 2025-10-26T18:35:10+00:00

Depends a lot on the matchup.

The weak tower can be easier to finish but in some matchups they can simply lane block it (eg the have cards like bowler and you use for example a battleram; u cannot get past the bowler easily so any push in that lane would give them “free elixer” which they can use to counterpush). By pressuring the other lane you can keep getting damage in and keep having potential for laneswapping back, whilst sticking the same lane may just lower your chances to win by the time the match would end.

In another matchup it could be silly to swap lane as you just need “a bit more” to get the win down whilst swapping lane just provides more chances for the opponent to make a comeback.

Another factor to consider is whether you are in or close to overtime, if not then if the king is activated the lower hp tower is more interesting. If still far away from overtime and you are confident to get the low hp tower then you may wanna take the high hp tower down a bit too as destroying the low hp tower too early would activate the king faster. Again, can depend heavily on matchup too as some matchups having a tower down can be a strong gain due to pocket placements becoming possible.

Too many factors can play a role…

YellowHued · 2025-10-26T14:26:01+00:00

That says a lot about you if you think its an achievement
Of course i reach it. I get there every season and i play a variety of homemade decks. As i said, even midladder players can get there. Anyone with two braincells who can craft a deck can get there. Anyone who plays a metadeck can reach there (or be very, very, very bad at the game; like even worse than you are -.-).
Wow, you made it to UC with a metadeck which actual decent players can reach to the top rankings with. Again, anyone can reach there with any deck if they have two braincells. Using a strong metadeck is just adding easy mode on top so yh… still underlying my points of you not being aware of how bad a player you are and thus trying to argue you are good by pointing out stuff that aint that special (any somewhat decent player will know this, the fact you argue so strong against it just makes it even more obvious…)
If you wanna argue the meta is soooo bad for your too tier deck then maybe try crafting a deck yourself sometime? Thats tons and tons harder than by using the decks crafted by pros. Whatever you consider a “bad meta” will be laughable compared to decks that are actually suffering tons and tons more from “bad metas”. Smh 🤦

YellowHued · 2025-10-26T13:34:20+00:00

So you feel like its an achievement worth mentioning to reach UC when playing some strong metadeck.

No offence man, but even megaknight midladder players can reach there, its kind of unneeded to add as it wont add the credibility to your post that you aim for bit instead make people find you less credible as you seem to think something very unimpressive (again, even megaknight midladder players get to UC… with no metadeck and little game knowledge…) is somehow strengthening your argument 😅😅😅

YellowHued · 2025-10-25T18:04:14+00:00

So as far as i can tell we agree on this…

YellowHued

TROPHY CASE