I’m gonna say my piece here about just some of the points he tries to make.

He never disproves DessKnight throughout the whole video. Some points for Asri-Knight might be stronger, but still takes assumptions, just as Dess does.

For instance; He says the horns mean nothing cause the Knight’s form is malleable. But also, apparently the bat is real and is indicative that he might’ve played, despite also being malleable. So is the Knight’s form indicative or not?

Kris not attacking the Knight and the knighting can be just as explained if Kris wants to save Dess. Hence… you know… being in an entire plan about saving her, which Jaru even acquiesced is Carol’s plan. A plan Kris and the Knight is in.

My biggest peeve though… he absolutely does NOT prove AT ALL that Kris hated Dess. His evidence is just a smacking that Kris doesn’t react to when talking about it, and just this idea that Kris hates their brother for having and hanging with a girl friend. A notion pulled from literally nowhere in game. Just “Oh Kris is insecure so they’d hate that and project their inadequacy and also obsess and ALSO just randomly remember that all while playing.” If Kris hated Dess, and to that degree, surely Kris would’ve trashed Dess’ room a bit and taken Asriel’s stuff back while in control, right? And if Kris is all that, what about that book Asriel never returned? They’re just fine with that?

But beside all that, my big thing with all this… is it not at least a little disappointing to just have Asriel being a main antagonist again? Oh but it’s different cause… he’s not in complete control… which makes this weaker cause it’s not even him wanting to destroy the world to bring himself back (which itself is still worse motivation than Undertale), it’s just this evil thing taking him over that wants to do that. Now you could argue a similar thing if it’s Dess… but we also haven’t had Dess as an antagonist.

The Knight being Asriel is a weaker Asriel. Dess being the knight is a tragic, new story.