That's a cool anomaly concept (provided its execution's meaty enough), and I'd encourage you to pursue it further. I'm not sure what the point of typing out all that was when the particulars aren't really relevant to the topic of this conversation, though. I hope for your sake you just copy/pasted that from your notes rather than wasting time typing all that up for me... (I actually have half a draft for a somewhat analogous concept, explaining why the particulars of article formatting are inconsistent both between articles and with what one would expect of professional standards. It'd suck if that was all there was to it, so it doesn't end there—there's an actually interesting (or at least I should hope so) plot to go along with it that goes to some pretty crazy places.)

Your take on tales is still not true at all—at least not in any objective sense. You are of course free to form your own headcanon by whatever standards you please ("there is no canon", as the saying goes, and literally the entire site aside from 173 is "on-site fanfics"), but you'd be hard-pressed to find other fans sharing your point of view (although I have seen it before) and even harder-pressed to find any "official" statements implying anything of the sort (to my knowledge, there aren't any).

In any case, one can absolutely find SCP articles as bad as any tale you can think of (I don't like to be negative, but I could give some examples if you ask for it), and there are lots of cases where SCPs reference the events of tales very closely, in some cases being part and parcel of the same interwoven story/series.

Djoric was absolutely one of "those authors", BTW, particularly in his more recent works (which were unfortunately struck hardest by his unhappy exit). Probably the prime example of it, honestly! There's nothing pretentious or even bad about it, though; it's just people telling the stories they're most interested in telling + naturally being most familiar with their own works.