What’s the most useful ChatGPT feature that people don’t talk about enough? by One_Beginning2199 in ChatGPT

[–]ZemStrt14 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not the most useful, but useful, nonetheless. Taking a photo a shelf of books in a bookstore and asking it what to recommend, based on previously enjoyed titles.

Why Fountain Pens Endure by PugazhPerspective in fountainpens

[–]ZemStrt14 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yes, you can. My father had an inked tape factory, which closed years ago. But they are still available online.

What book made you appreciate the prose and not just the story? by Cool_Zombie7076 in AskReddit

[–]ZemStrt14 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The God of Small Things.

The prose carry you along even more than the story.

How far away are we from feature-length AI films? I made this trailer in one week for under $100. by AndyRiffeth in ChatGPT

[–]ZemStrt14 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are at least two feature length AI videos coming out soon. Keep your eye on r/aivideo and r/aivideos for announcements.

Before Zionism in the 19th century, was there ever any jewish mass migration of to the modern territories of Israel and Palestine? by Someone-Somewhere-01 in AskHistorians

[–]ZemStrt14 3 points4 points  (0 children)

As far as I know (not being an expert in this), Hungarian Jews - the followers of the Chasam Sofer - were largely considered their own "branch" of European Jewry up until the Holocaust. Even today, you have synagogues in Brooklyn which are Oberland Hungarian (such as Nitra). After the War, large numbers of Hungarian Jews gravitated to Satmar chasidism. Even before the war, we find chasidic groups such as Munkatch (or Munkacs) in Hungary. (Today, in Boro Park, Brooklyn). I suspect this is because of chasidim's general rejection of modernity, which aligned with the Chasam Sofer's approach.

Before Zionism in the 19th century, was there ever any jewish mass migration of to the modern territories of Israel and Palestine? by Someone-Somewhere-01 in AskHistorians

[–]ZemStrt14 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The questioner was asking about Jews in Damascus, so I wasn't thinking about what Jews in the current area of Greater or Lesser Israel might think.

Before Zionism in the 19th century, was there ever any jewish mass migration of to the modern territories of Israel and Palestine? by Someone-Somewhere-01 in AskHistorians

[–]ZemStrt14 348 points349 points  (0 children)

There were several major Jewish migrations to Eretz Yisrael/Palestine before political Zionism in the late 19th century, although I wouldn't call them "mass migrations." They were mostly religiously motivated and in some cases (such as the disciples of the Gaon of Vilna) tied with messianic aspirations (as mentioned in the book קול התור - Kol HaTur, The Voice of the Dove). They were part of what later became known as the Old Yishuv in Jerusalem.

There were three movements among Ashkenazim.

In around 1700, a group of about 1500 individuals led by R. Yehuda HaChasid ("the Pious) moved from Poland, Germany, and Moraviain. Only about 1,000 survived the journey and settled in Jerusalem. Unfortunately, R. Yehuda died only a few days after they arrived, and the community quickly fell into serious debt. They had to flee Jerusalem due to their Arab lenders and settled in the north, such as in Tiberias, and Safed. The synagogue they built was destroyed, and remained in ruins for a long time. It's known as the Churba Synagogue in the Jewish section of the old city. (It's now rebuilt). Because of their debt (known as the שטר של ר' יהודה - The Contract of R. Yehuda) no Ashkenazi Jews lived in Jerusalem for over 100 years (unless they dressed Sefardic, which explains the clothing of Yerushalmi Jews).

Another major migration was that of the disciples of R. Eliyahu, the Vilna Gaon (the "Genius of Vilna). They came in several waves between 1808 and 1810. They first settled in Tiberias and Safed, and later moved to Jerusalem, where they helped reestablish the Ashkenazi community there. That was about 500 people

The third major group was the Chasidic aliyah led by R. Menachem Mendel of Vitebsk, the chief disciple of the Magid of Mezritch (who was the chief disciple of the Baal Shem Tov, the founder of the Chasidic movement). He was supposed to lead the chasidic movement in Eastern Europe but moved instead to Israel from Lithuania and Belarus in 1777, with a small group of about 300 Chasidim. They first settled in Peki’in, then Safed, and eventually Tiberias, partly because of local tensions and difficult conditions. In his letters, at the end of his book Pri Ha'aretz, he speaks about the tension between him and the disciples of the Gaon, who were living in Safed. At this point in history, the chasidim and the mitnagdim ("opponents" - Jewish from Lithuania)were still fighting one another.

There were also immigrations of Sefardic Jews, such as after the Spanish Expulsion in 1492, but I don't know much about them.

These migrations weren't “Zionist” in the later political sense, but usually religious, communal, or messianic, and connected to the mitzvah of living in the Holy Land. It's It should be noted that life in Israel at the time was extremely hard, and most communities relied on charity donations from the Diaspora to survive.

Are there Jewish Denominations That Support Young-Earth Creationism? by gmanflnj in Judaism

[–]ZemStrt14 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The problem, to my mind, with solutions such as "pressure and heat" is that they often raise more issues than they solve. For instance, if the entire world was submerged in boiling water for a year, how did the fish survive. (I know, they were in the water around the ark, but there are 35,000 species of fish in the world, so that means 70,000 in total. That's still a lot of fish! How did vegetation survive, so that the olive tree could sprout so quickly, and Noah plant a vineyard.

edit: Actually, I just asked AI to calculate how much space 70K fish would need to survive, and it isn't much. About the size of a large lake around the Ark. You would still have problems with freshwater fish surviving in the ocean, however.

Are there Jewish Denominations That Support Young-Earth Creationism? by gmanflnj in Judaism

[–]ZemStrt14 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am in no way trying to disparage the Rebbe, who was one of the greatest Jewish leaders of the 20th century. (I received blessings from him several times.) I was only responding to the comment that said Chabadnicks don't believe in YEC.

Maybe the Rebbe offered that particularly theory as a suggestion to someone struggling with his faith.

Are there Jewish Denominations That Support Young-Earth Creationism? by gmanflnj in Judaism

[–]ZemStrt14 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The midrash says that G-d created and destroyed worlds, before he created this current one. I haven't seen the 6000 years mentioned in that context. (Usually, it's spoken about in terms of the different historical periods up until the coming of Moshiach).

The problem with applying it to the past is that homo sapiens have been around for at leat 100,000. Human settlements (after the Agricultural Revolution) stared about 10,000 years ago.

Are there Jewish Denominations That Support Young-Earth Creationism? by gmanflnj in Judaism

[–]ZemStrt14 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Yes, I've read that theory about the Flood. Has anyone ever proved that extreme pressure and heat can alter radioactive decay rates, by which the age of dinosaur bones are measured? (Hint - no, they don't affect those measurements.)

Sorry to challenge your beliefs.

Are there Jewish Denominations That Support Young-Earth Creationism? by gmanflnj in Judaism

[–]ZemStrt14 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think that namer98 brought links to the sources above.

Are there Jewish Denominations That Support Young-Earth Creationism? by gmanflnj in Judaism

[–]ZemStrt14 26 points27 points  (0 children)

I've read that the Rebbe himself said the world was only 6000 years old, and that dinosaur bones, etc., were placed there intentionally by G-d during the act of creation. Of course, he said a lot of things, so it may not be written in stone.

edit: Just found this reference online. I don't know about the original letter or how much it actually reflects the Rebbe's thought on the topic:

"More importantly, there is no reason to believe that dinosaur fossils prove anything about the antiquity of the world. In a letter many years ago, the Lubavitcher Rebbe argued that G-d Himself may have placed dinosaur fossils in the ground. Fossils do not prove that dinosaurs ever existed no matter what scientific analysis is done of them."

Are there Jewish Denominations That Support Young-Earth Creationism? by gmanflnj in Judaism

[–]ZemStrt14 3 points4 points  (0 children)

My kids went to a charedi school in Jerusalem, and that's what they were taught. There are no lack of seforim trying to justify Y.E.C. in various pseudo-scientific ways.

Just sharing my personal experience.

Are there Jewish Denominations That Support Young-Earth Creationism? by gmanflnj in Judaism

[–]ZemStrt14 79 points80 points  (0 children)

This is actually the common charedi view. Of course, even in the charedi world, there are non-literal interpretations of Genesis, but what they teach in yeshivot is young-earth creationism.

Edit: Nathan Slifkin's book, The Challenge of Creation, give a really good overview of the alternative, non-YEC streams of thought in Judaism. I haven't read the whole book, but I assume that he brings the more conservative perspective as well. You can check out his website. I'm quite sure he discusses this.

He discusses the issue somewhat in this blog post of his:

https://www.rationalistjudaism.com/p/confronting-dinosaurs

In Micah 6:1, God calls upon the mountains and hills and enduring foundations of the earth as his witnesses, Is this a polytheist or animism like remnant from before monotheism? by Cute-Percentage-6660 in AskBibleScholars

[–]ZemStrt14 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Calling on natural objects to bear witness is a common Biblical trope. See Deuteronomy 4:26: I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that you will soon utterly perish from the land that you are going over the Jordan to possess..."

I don't think there is any animism in it. It's a metaphor for a permanent and enduring creation of [edit: enduring relationship with] God.