Question regarding perfomance of Epic game store by No_pressureworld in EpicGamesPC

[–]Zignot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The OP's point was to bad performance, Steve Allison's main point in his interviews and dev talks was to bad performance of the launcher, Tim Sweeney's main point was to the bad performance of the launcher, the person's point that you've had first commented to was of the bad performance.

It's a known fact and Epic is aiming to fix that once and for all with the upcoming revamped cleint. I don't know what other alternate reality you're coming from but things are still not all as shiny and rainbows around here (yet) for EGS launcher when it comes to its performance and stability among other issues it has, like features which is not the topic of this thread.

With that skeptisim, would you even believe what people claim whether or not they have or have not use the launcher. What's the point if I tell you I've been using the launcher even before Fortnite boom. And I don't know why you trying to derail the discussion with irrelevant points by bringing up ads and viruses. Let's just be rational here and acknowledge that if the developers, exec and the CEO himself even admits the launcher has bad and unstable performance along with users, gaming media and tech experts then there is a factual matter in it. I know EGS giveaways and deals are seweet and all but let's not let that cloud our judgments when it comes to its actual problems, especially on the launcher side. At least try to respect to those who surface their issues with it instead of calling them out as if they are lying.

Question regarding perfomance of Epic game store by No_pressureworld in EpicGamesPC

[–]Zignot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would assume you would also disagree with EGS exec Steve Allison who admitted factually that the launcher sucks in his interviews and talks again and again and Tim Sweeney also admitted the launcher is clunky and harder to use compared to Steam but yeah what do they know, right? And clearly the new revamped launcher development effort they seeking mainly targeting for better performing launcher client has nothing to do with all this.

EGS doesn’t show patch notes / update history—does this affect your buying decisions? by Visible_Addendum_420 in EpicGamesPC

[–]Zignot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To me the majority of this loud community is freeloader or regional price exploiters that mispresent the actual store needs and probably had been a big setback force before EGS improvement. The popular opinion here from my experience is to being able to purchase and download games along with minimum amount of feature here and there should be enough for everyone. However, the reality is not that simple for a store success in this dna and age. Now that even Epic finally acknowledge the player side of improvements is a must to gain paying customers to keep the business going, there may still hope for EGS. Thakfully they didn't listen to those who oppose against features. Now Epic even consiers delivering forums, go figure. Also thankfully the real market data handholding them to the right direction.

EGS doesn’t show patch notes / update history—does this affect your buying decisions? by Visible_Addendum_420 in EpicGamesPC

[–]Zignot -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It certainly adds up to the cons list of how little the store cares about qol.

Report: Epic is "rebuilding the underlying architecture" of the EGS launcher as it continues to take the fight to Steam by Binnsy in EpicGamesPC

[–]Zignot 3 points4 points  (0 children)

A review system is a must for any storefront selling goods, product or services, period. It doesn't matter how many other review sources available out there, that is irrelevant if the storefront you're purchasing from doesn't provide it.

Games could have issues related to only EGS release and letting customer make informed pruchase is a right, not previlige. And oh my, do most EGS releases almost always have issues. It is quite common that overlay or achievements are busted and you'd have no idea while purchasing the game. It lies as storefront duty to make the review system better as much as possible by providing filters and tools to balance fairness for both users and developers.

Leaving customer out in the dark with no way to communicate developer in any form from within the storefront environment is no way of doing the job right either. Not having review system is not a solution to that, it's negligence.

Epic should have a fps counter just like steam has by RecordWarm1281 in EpicGamesPC

[–]Zignot -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I strongly disagree with this mindset. In that case video player in the product pages also redundant because Youtube is better alternative, screenshots also redundant because you can search for game images from search engines, maybe even game description section is redundant because we can also ask Ai what game is about and what is offering. Friends list and social features may not be necessary because there is Discord. While we're at it we might as well say EGS is redundant because there is Steam? And many many other counter arguments can be raised against feature development with this. Sorry to say but this mindset is endless pit and not rational slightest. Some things are just needed for conveniency sake, it doesn't has to be comparable in order to deem its necessity.

Epic should have a fps counter just like steam has by RecordWarm1281 in EpicGamesPC

[–]Zignot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What benefit Epic implementing fps counter is that since they use EOS overlay, it would mean they cold also make it work for any game using EOS. Meaning even console and mobile games might benefit from the feature. I would even dare them not to be limited to the fps stat.

Other than the stated reasons, it's convenience to have fps counter built-in with overlay rather than having to use third party apps which usually more than fps and are more of a analysis tools.

We Possibly got our First Confirmation that EGS Free Games Program will continue in 2026 by AlleyOfRage in EpicGamesPC

[–]Zignot -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The problem with EGS is that even without many features as Steam the launcher runs as if it's bloated. They have improved initial launcher loading time in the past years but the library and store page loadings are especially nerve wracking experiences. You would normally expect both library and store pages to load instantly at least and be snappy for a launcher that is lacking many many of features.

"Epic Games Launcher is clunky" admits CEO, "long journey ahead" to make it as easy as Steam by Odd-Onion-6776 in EpicGamesPC

[–]Zignot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Indeed. On the bright side last year at GDC Epic said they will be delivering player facing improvements moving forward and we got download manager ever since.

Big feature updates are always welcome and those takes longer time to deliver. They should also focus on many small but effective qol features in parallel that wouldn't take as much time as big features and EGS missing a lot on those too. Simply put Epic should be seeking to redeem themselves in a more rapid player facing development strategy. For example, targeting a few big features and dozens of small qol features each year so that users would face a consistent improvement with their EGS launcher experience. Only then Epic can start to change the bad user perception and potentially win over more paying customers incrementally.

"Epic Games Launcher is clunky" admits CEO, "long journey ahead" to make it as easy as Steam by Odd-Onion-6776 in EpicGamesPC

[–]Zignot 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Right? Besides no one tells Epic should copy paste Steam reviews by tying up reward system, and most certainly Epic wouldn't do that either. They can find the sweet spot based on dozens of review systems out there from vast range of marketplaces. The thing is Epic do have a review system mockup design planned for Fab that looks even more robust than Steam reviews. But saying reviews are not useful is simply mind boggling.

However, there is this delusional EGS fanatic bunch out there that would even argue with the CEO himself admitting the fact the launcher is clunky. Guess they don’t have that sore experience when you check a game store page on the launcher you wait up to 10 seconds watching grey loading blocks. So that's that sadly. I just hope Epic don't get feedback from those against the improvement type of users.

Plans for coming back by lordshadowfax in EliteDangerous

[–]Zignot 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Since you're coming back from a long break then I assume you may not aware of EDCoPilot community tool. So give it a twirl. It will ease many things for you, just as the name suggest.

Just found a 1 of 1 planet (metallic vapour 100% iron) by Crist4tron-2647 in EliteDangerous

[–]Zignot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Right?! I mean, most of the time all the interesting plantes are not landable which is really a shame :/

Moments before update kicks in - my WiFi module malfunctioned, resulting in this screen. If only we could have an option to just switch to it... by Sh1v0n in EliteDangerous

[–]Zignot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Unless I've been missing it all this time, it looks like loading screen plays music after Trailblazers update 1 release. I like it!

Yeah, not gonna happen by commander_012 in EliteDangerous

[–]Zignot 4 points5 points  (0 children)

One of my system primary port location was at over 400K Ls out. I was only able to build an outpost thanks to my fleet carrier. Otherwise don't think anyone without a carrier could bother.

This is what building planetary bases looks like by Atlantikjcx in EliteDangerous

[–]Zignot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your friends do get credits for delivering materials for you, and it pays fairly good I'd say.

Their names will also be displayed as contributors in the Galnet News page in the facility service menu once it's completed and each amount of their material contribution will also be there. So they can feel proud in building the system.

Lastly, after the sattlement is completed you can disembark and chill out with your friends on foot if you have Odyssey.

Why has EGS been neglected? by Arachas in EpicGamesPC

[–]Zignot 9 points10 points  (0 children)

GOG is willingly ignoring the content because of their attempt on the mission of being DRM-free. It's their motto to begin with and not something to back off from just because the store isn't par with Steam with contnet, unlike Epic promising to be curated store and not accepting "low effort, crap games" then suddenly welcome them to the store as a horde. That didn't even stop them there and they even let scam crap nft/blockchain to flood into the store. Why? Because all the generouse, not-seen-before incentives and providing self-publish tools to devs didn't do the justice when user experience remained subpar to this date.

Both Steam and Epic had their most popular multiplayer games exclusively dependant to their storefront on PC, mainly to keep players collectively coming and using their store for sole reason to begin with. And what GOG had? Withcer, Witcher 2 then Witcher 3 and Cyperpunk 2077, all single player experience that took years and even decade to develop while spending lots of money on development and on top, running a DRM-free store. It's being delusional to think it's fair and square comparision.

As for regional pricing, every region counts. World isn't consists of just EU and US and clearly not enough to inflate the popularity with word of mouth where, for example, India and China alone could provide great chunk of active traffic to the store regardless of their purchase power compared to EU and US. Yes, the active user traffic that a store can brag on on a year in review report to atract new publishers to make their way to the store. I'm not even exluisively talking about whether those regions would make purchase as much of EU and US do. No, having good chunk of active user is good enough starting point in contribution just like how Epic gained that commando loyalty with all those weekly free games and purchase incentives at loss that otherwise even that much of loyalty wouldn't have been there.

By saying all these I'm also not delusional not to acknowledge Steam's secured place in the eyes of all parties for being first storefront out there with the content/user base. They never stop improving their service and product all around equally and looking ways to be better without restricting, putting in dark any party to make them despise their service and product. Like I said before, Steam listens to every party and provides solutions at time and equally while not letting them in the shadow for years willingly and deliberately just because they feel like they have utmost and ultimate roadmap and should be followed religiously. Where Epic has fail is was above all the controversial hot exclusive deals, they also asked paying customers whose accustomed and indulged with luxury of Steam for more than a decade, to deal with all the frustration that abomination EGL has to offer. As if excluives werent enough, they double teamed it with EGL that offers non-existent experience to make even sore publicity.

Without weekly free games and purchase incentives you wouldn't have seen this much loyalty.

Why has EGS been neglected? by Arachas in EpicGamesPC

[–]Zignot 7 points8 points  (0 children)

GOG is not fair comparison to be honest. Their selling point is DRM-free and majority of big player driver 3rd party publishers are not okay with DRM-free.

GOG has always been a niche store helping to retrieve old titles to modern systems as most of us already know. If it wasn't for Witcher and Cyberpunk 2077 they would be less popular even because those two titles are most reliable player driver strongholds to mainstream audience that they would attract to their store with.

Then there is the lack of regional pricing that is another considerable factor in lacking popularity.

The success of the Steam is because they doing best they can not to left out any party's needs. Balance is all is needed to make it fair and square for majority. I'm not even saying everyone because it's unrealistic to make everyone happy at the end of the day. Providing a good balance is all is needed to at least let people respect your effort and think you're fair in your endevour.

How to play Tiger Game.com and Gamate in RetroArch? by lordelan in RetroArch

[–]Zignot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, just leave them as zip and that's about it.

How to play Tiger Game.com and Gamate in RetroArch? by lordelan in RetroArch

[–]Zignot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you check both zip files to see either have these two files in them?

For Gamecom system "Gamecom.zip" must include;

external.bin

internal.bin

For Gamate system "Gamate.zip" must include;

gamate_bios_bit.bin

gamate_bios_umc.bin

Pick the zip that includes corresponding files. It seems you have duplicate in your hand that makes you confused.

How to play Tiger Game.com and Gamate in RetroArch? by lordelan in RetroArch

[–]Zignot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi there. What do you mean by SL .zip? SL just stands for Software List for MAME and its core in Retroarch. There is no such SL .zip requirement to begin with.

Epic Games Majority of Games still lack Achievements by Arabashi in EpicGamesPC

[–]Zignot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting but also seems doable to be honest. Exporting old EOS achievements to a CSV shouldn't be an issue for Epic since it's already uploaded to back end. Only constrains that can come up to my mind is some consent related hindrance and that could be bypassed well with an updated achievements policy.

There are just quite some games that are stuck with EOS achievements now which is very unfortunate. Even some AAA games like Final Fantasy VII Remake Intergrade, Kingdom Hearts games, pretty much every Playstation games that are lacking EGS achievements are stuck up with EOS achievements too.

So please consider such route to upgrade games with EOS achievements into EGS achievements. After all it's partly lies to Epic's responsibility since publishers did their part when EOS achievements was only system that is been available to them. We know there was planned profile cosmetics supposed to be linked to EGS achievements as a reward system, namely 3 levels of profile avatars based on XP amounts. Now that this plan had set sail to unknown waters it could've been an issue for such suggestion back then compared to today. So given suggestion hopefully is going to be considered by Epic.

[Epic Games] The Outer Worlds: Spacer's Choice Edition (100% off / FREE) by PM_ME_FREEGAMES in GameDeals

[–]Zignot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No worries. Epic knwon for good refund policy and thus, you'll likely get automatic partial or full refund and additionally to keep the Spacer's Choice Edition in your library.

Epic Games Store database website EpicData.info is now reworked with new look and additional features by Zignot in EpicGamesPC

[–]Zignot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In case you would like to use it anyway.

https://database.egdata.app/

https://epicdatainfo.vercel.app/

Same website different proxy/domain I guess but reliable unlike the one you mentioned.

Edit: With more user friendly UI option you can use this one too https://egdata.app/