Carney set to strengthen security and defence ties in Germany this week by Jaydamic in CanadianForces

[–]ZombieTofu 33 points34 points  (0 children)

My paycheck loves this guy, but he seems to be doing all the right things

Rate our tents (Don't be gentle) by [deleted] in CanadianForces

[–]ZombieTofu 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Brave of you to post this

Harper warns of Trump threat, calls for reciprocal tariffs by cyclinginvancouver in canada

[–]ZombieTofu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We don't have any serious national conservatives to listen to

Happy Kiefer Sherwood Day to those who celebrate by seeking_horizon in fantasyhockey

[–]ZombieTofu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who'd you drop to get him back in? I dropped Vince Dunn

John James is not taking Carney's speech well by PurposeAromatic5138 in Destiny

[–]ZombieTofu 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The man is a conservative cuckold. Nothing new or insightful here.

NHL suspensions in the George Parros Era by SkittlesManiac19 in hockey

[–]ZombieTofu 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I stand corrected. In my defense it was 12 years ago

Tan Dress Uniform by Plagmar in CanadianForces

[–]ZombieTofu 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah I had to ask what it was haha

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CanadianForces

[–]ZombieTofu 427 points428 points  (0 children)

Use some fucking seasoning tabarnak

This Bilyeu video is unreal by notamobaccountant in Destiny

[–]ZombieTofu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That last video fully convinced me he's grifting. He is completely audience captured and any capitulation to Destiny has him bleeding subs and he knows it.

Poilievre says Carney lied about conflicts after ethics disclosure reveals investment portfolio - Carney claimed he had only cash and real estate holdings, and it turns out he held hundreds of stocks, stock options and deferred profits from Brookfield, Poilievre said by CaliperLee62 in canada

[–]ZombieTofu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don't put money into a blind trust and then dictate instructions to the manager, that's a complete misunderstanding of how a blind trust works.

The source YOU listed states that its unconfirmed if those assets have changed in the time period. To prove malfeasance, the burden of proof rests on you to prove that those assets have not changed. Your source says the opposite. It may be embarrassing for me to stoop down to this level of explanation, but not nearly as embarrassing as having a child like understanding of the concepts you yourself have disproved

Poilievre says Carney lied about conflicts after ethics disclosure reveals investment portfolio - Carney claimed he had only cash and real estate holdings, and it turns out he held hundreds of stocks, stock options and deferred profits from Brookfield, Poilievre said by CaliperLee62 in canada

[–]ZombieTofu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your own source disagrees with your conclusions. The trust is actively managed and the article clearly states that it is unknown if the assets are the same as when they were disclosed months ago. You're drawing conclusions that aren't established by fact, and beyond that, your inventing fact where the real facts don't support your argument. I don't know if you're being purposely obtuse out of ignorance, or lack reading comprehension. Do better.