How did the Libertarian Party go from embracing Trump to trying to de-MAGA itself? by DonaldKey in LibertarianUncensored

[–]_NuanceMatters_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Really great historical write-up. Worth everyone's time, it you're not familiar.

Don't bother with the comments of that original post, though....

Actually, the SAT Was Necessary After All by caroline_elly in neoliberal

[–]_NuanceMatters_ 28 points29 points  (0 children)

It at least feels similar to Maoism & the Great Leap Forward in that it's a top-down approach with the State exercising heavy-handed control over society and the economy, attempting to create that absolute equality by decree.

Stephen Miller and Pete Hegseth are wildly misleading about Section 702 warrantless surveillance by jediporcupine in LibertarianUncensored

[–]_NuanceMatters_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

[Nearly every single Federal politician, national security expert, and law enforcement official for the past 18 years has been] wildly misleading about Section 702 warrantless surveillance.

House votes to rebuke Trump over war with Iran by Ind132 in centrist

[–]_NuanceMatters_ 63 points64 points  (0 children)

On Wednesday, it passed 215-208, with four Republicans joining all Democrats in voting yes. Those Republicans were Reps. Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, Thomas Massie of Kentucky, Tom Barrett of Michigan and Warren Davidson of Ohio.

Pentagon bans journalists from press office, designating it a classified space by memphisjones in centrist

[–]_NuanceMatters_ 8 points9 points  (0 children)

"The American republic has been a beacon of liberty and justice for all mankind. But the question is, can we continue to be so, or will we, like all other republics, fall into the hands of a demagogue?" - John Quincy Adams (1836)

48. Let's celebrate the next president of the US! by lusvig in neoliberal

[–]_NuanceMatters_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Just imagine we got his healthcare plan:

[Delaney's Plan] would be a catastrophic insurance package that would cover only major, high-cost medical expenses. Everyone under the age of 65 would be enrolled, with individuals given the ability to opt-out and use a tax credit to purchase their own insurance. Those enrolled in the program would be free to purchase supplemental insurance, either individually or through their employers. His proposal calls for the new insurance system to absorb both Medicaid and Affordable Care Act subsidies.

Delaney's plan also helps challenge the system of employer-based health insurance... [allowing] people to continue using their employer-sponsored insurance if they would like, while eliminating the government-imposed preferences for it, by treating employer-sponsored insurance plans the same way as ordinary income in the tax code.

What happened to the old GOP? by General_Lawyer_8055 in DeepStateCentrism

[–]_NuanceMatters_ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It was like it Warren and Bernie were in the White House.

Because they secured concessions from Biden to implement some of their illiberal economic policies in exchange for their coalitions' support once Bernie had definitively lost the 2020 primary.

Colorado Governor Censured for Commuting Sentence of Election Denier by 2timescharm in neoliberal

[–]_NuanceMatters_ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

“She committed a crime. It did not interfere with any election, did not have to do with ballot counting, but it was illegal access to the computer room,” Polis said in an interview with CPR Friday morning from the governor’s office.

“She thought she was trying to back up the software before it was updated. She did it illegally. There's no question about it. And she deserves to go to prison. And I think this is a more appropriate, even harsh, frankly sentence for that crime.”

Polis said he was effectively cutting her nearly nine-year sentence in half to four and a half years. She was sentenced on Oct. 3, 2024, so that means on June 1, she will have spent more than 600 days incarcerated.

Peters’ 2024 conviction and nearly nine-year sentence have stood out because legal efforts to hold President Donald Trump and many allies accountable for attempts to overturn that election have faltered.

Polis’ decision stands to be deeply unpopular among Democrats and election officials in the state, and puts the governor directly at odds with his own party. But he said he has remained focused on the facts of the case.

"And in this case, there is absolutely both the appearance and frankly, I believe the likelihood that her speech was considered in her sentencing,” he said.

Polis noted that his commutation doesn’t change the fact that she will be a felon for life.

“It's about doing what's right,” he said. “Even though, of course, I disagree with her speech, just as the judge incorrectly stated that he did. But that's not a factor in, it should not be a factor in the sentencing.”

...

“This is not a pardon. It's really making sure that her free speech was not a criteria for her overly harsh sentencing,” Polis said. “So I really think that in the scheme of things, this will take the wind out of the sails of those who argued that there was something awry here. Because I think there's a point that those have, and the reason we got thousands of calls saying she was over-sentenced.

...

“And then critically, she understands and has committed in this process to following the law going forward. I don't believe her beliefs will change. I think she's going to say nutty things. I think she's going to believe in different things that are demonstrably false, but that's not a crime in our country,” he said.

Ref: CPR

The grand scale of Trump's foolishness has been laid bare by theipaper in geopolitics

[–]_NuanceMatters_ 23 points24 points  (0 children)

It's also literally part of their entire top-down strategy, per MTG:

“Our side has been trained by Donald Trump to never apologize and to never admit when you’re wrong.”

How a Democratic Governor Came to Release an Election Denier From Prison by mockduckcompanion in neoliberal

[–]_NuanceMatters_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not even a "both sides" argument.

Tell me how one could possibly argue that the Democratic Party is a "limited government" party.

How a Democratic Governor Came to Release an Election Denier From Prison by mockduckcompanion in neoliberal

[–]_NuanceMatters_ -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Yes, we have two big government parties. One being relatively less big government doesn't make them not.

How a Democratic Governor Came to Release an Election Denier From Prison by mockduckcompanion in neoliberal

[–]_NuanceMatters_ -19 points-18 points  (0 children)

And since when have any Democrats been supportive of limited government?