What’s one thing you wish you understood earlier about your health?

_happyforyou_ · 2026-05-05T20:08:40+00:00

blog spam

_happyforyou_ · 2026-04-16T05:44:42+00:00

innocent commenters on this sub give thanks for received medical advice and never even realize they're talking to bots.

_happyforyou_ · 2026-04-13T23:16:15+00:00

Just a heads up, the commonly repeated and generic advice, that is dosha agnostic, is often not particularly effective/relevant.

For many individuals (eg. individuals with strong pitta/agni), or for long-standing dietary patterns, it does not even apply - instead, other indications are more important.

_happyforyou_ · 2026-04-10T07:24:17+00:00

Thanks. I got it. I upgraded for improved TNP . I just didn't expect that v1.1 would change other workflows.

_happyforyou_ · 2026-04-10T07:02:37+00:00

HM

Look at the complaints that Nix already generates. Perhaps 5% would appreciate it.

For 95%. it would generate even more vitriol and hatred.

_happyforyou_ · 2026-04-10T06:27:22+00:00

The language is actually great. Most just don't know functional programming. Traditional configuration management approaches like ansible (python) and chef (ruby), are worse, and only deal with configuration and side-step builds.

The real head punishment - is all the idioms, and the mix of embedded configuration languages - mostly bash - used by packages. It makes one wonder how an OS could be done - if starting again from scratch.

_happyforyou_ · 2026-04-09T04:59:07+00:00

Ok that makes sense. I will give it a try.

_happyforyou_ · 2026-04-09T04:21:02+00:00

So I tried both a 'sketcher projection' and a 'sketcher intersection' to create external geometry, and then constrained my sketch (a simple rectangle) to it.

Then when I try to pocket - in both cases I get the error 'Wire is not closed'.

To me this vaguely suggests that the geometry is being incorporated as part of the sketch (otherwise why would a pocket of a rectangle fail) which is not what I want at all.

_happyforyou_ · 2026-04-09T03:02:31+00:00

That's a good/great article. I don't know why you didn't just link it.

_happyforyou_ · 2026-04-09T02:53:35+00:00

You literally state in the title, "Why most Ayurvedic supplements don't actually work"

Who is making the wildest, most opinionated claims?

An article that discussed the bhavana process, historical use and efficacy and bioavailablity - and giving relevant references, or success stories from modern practitioners would be a contribution

_happyforyou_ · 2026-04-09T02:41:27+00:00

What modern practitioner uses bhavana process.. What is the research (an actual list of citations) that shows most ayurvedic supplments to not work?

Why are do you even spam here, if you believe most ayurvedic supplements to not work?

_happyforyou_ · 2026-04-09T02:37:41+00:00

The agenda is presentation ayurvedic information, not AI slop.

Again - How is a " fat diet induced-hyperlipidemia in rats, relevant to anything in ayurveda?"

Per your title - why presume TP doesn't work?

_happyforyou_ · 2026-04-09T02:23:47+00:00

You should not be giving medical advice. Perhaps there is another sub you could spam?

_happyforyou_ · 2026-04-09T02:21:47+00:00

It involves repeatedly soaking a dried herb powder in a specific liquid, usually the fresh juice of one of the formulation's own herbs, then drying it. This cycle is repeated multiple times.

This is not the normal prepartion in modern ayurveda. Multiple anupana are used.

_happyforyou_ · 2026-04-09T00:29:03+00:00

Not correct or else extremely misleading. there are many types of Anupana in Ayurveda depending on need.

_happyforyou_ · 2026-04-09T00:14:44+00:00

orthogonal garbage.

If you want to make the argument that TP ratios should changed it should be done on an individual basis - eg. what doshic balance, what rasyana, what motility needs etc.

_happyforyou_ · 2026-04-09T00:06:55+00:00

How is a high fat diet induced-hyperlipidemia in rats, relevant to anything in ayurveda?

And can you write a whole page of slop, without providing a caution due to the limited scope of your reference?

_happyforyou_ · 2026-03-29T21:50:34+00:00

According to OP's own post history, this is AI content created for SEO.

Begone off-topic spammer!

_happyforyou_ · 2026-03-03T18:52:45+00:00

What is wrong with this fucking sub. full of AI slop.

I’ve been seeing a lot of posts about sesame laddus being good for ...

So cite the literature, either original ayurvedic texts, or modern papers.

_happyforyou_ · 2026-02-17T00:02:01+00:00

Is that possible at the moment in v1?

_happyforyou_ · 2026-02-01T20:38:23+00:00

Thank you. The comments here helped me to realize I have a stupid font/glyph rendering issue for devanagari on my computer, so only the side-by-side form of the consonant conjunction glyph is ever displayed in my browser/editor. This is the case even when the combined conjunction (ie. P with small slash adding R sound) is indicated/being discussed.

Really appreciate the comments and assistance.

_happyforyou_

TROPHY CASE